|
|
|
michaelmurfy:
If you add a SSD as a cache drive you get incredibly quick writes also.
You have to unless you prefer to have write performance dropped to ~50 MB/s. And one should mention to add a 2nd SSD as write cache pool when you don't want to break the unRAID parity concept.
- NET: FTTH & VDSL, OPNsense, 10G backbone, GWN APs
- SRV: 12 RU HA server cluster, 0.1 PB storage on premise
- IoT: thread, zigbee, tasmota, BidCoS, LoRa, WX suite, IR
- 3D: two 3D printers, 3D scanner, CNC router, laser cutter
The one benefit of Windows Server 2016 Essentials that draws me is that it has (like WHRS) 'bare metal' backup. This is the ability to restore a dead PC/ laptop from scratch, OS and all. It works incredibly well in WHRS and I have reinstalled several PC's over the years when hard drives fail etc. You just boot from a CD or thumb drive then connect to the server. It takes less than an hour and you have the PC restored to the previous day's backup.
I don't believe that this feature is available elsewhere.
The things that put me off moving are (a) the hassle of moving data to Windows Server 2016 Essentials (b) the complexity of Windows Server 2016 Essentials and (c) cost.
FYI I was very happy with my install of WHRS until the server overheated (fan issue) and the hard drives were more or less wiped. I face a reinstall anyway.
Are the HP Microservers readily available in NZ?
Delete cookies?! Are you insane?!
prob:
The things that put me off moving are (a) the hassle of moving data to Windows Server 2016 Essentials (b) the complexity of Windows Server 2016 Essentials and (c) cost.
FYI I was very happy with my install of WHRS until the server overheated (fan issue) and the hard drives were more or less wiped. I face a reinstall anyway.
Are you planning to do a bare metal restore of WHS 2011 on new hardware then?
I've been playing with WSE 2016 for a week or so now in a virtual environment, and I really don't think it's that much more complex than WHS 2011. There are a bunch more functions/features/roles, and a couple more hoops to jump through (mainly if you don't want your clients to join the server domain), but for all intents and purposes, for me, it behaves like an updated version of WHS. I've been able to connect a virtual win10 PC, and a physical Win10 PC to the new server without a hitch, and both perform as expected, automatically logging on to the server and connecting to mapped drives etc. Better in that respect than WHS to be honest. Interestingly, I haven't had the problem that others have had of clients not being able to access the web if the server is down. I haven't yet tested the server backup or the remote access features. Still, the lack of a built-in DLNA server is a bit irksome, but it's not a feature I use regularly, and there are other options.
But yes, moving the data is going to be a bit of a hassle, with probably an intermediate step of copying the shared folders to another location.
Cost - I completely agree, although free is hard to beat! I am considering running the free WSE 2016 evaluation version for the maximum of three years, and after that make a call as to whether to update to 2019 or just build a new 2016.
I was actually just looking at the HP Proliant microserver at PBTech for ~$560 - a very reasonable price, I thought (not that I can afford to replace the server hardware right now).
So how does everyone feel about the security risks of running a home server OS beyond its support life?
David
Stay away from Proliant Gen10, too lame (for VMs) compared to Gen8 (which could be modified but that's not the case for Gen10 since CPU is soldered to the PCB).
- NET: FTTH & VDSL, OPNsense, 10G backbone, GWN APs
- SRV: 12 RU HA server cluster, 0.1 PB storage on premise
- IoT: thread, zigbee, tasmota, BidCoS, LoRa, WX suite, IR
- 3D: two 3D printers, 3D scanner, CNC router, laser cutter
You would have had to be quick, the price for the Gen10 is $995 now.
Delete cookies?! Are you insane?!
Twincamr2:
So how does everyone feel about the security risks of running a home server OS beyond its support life?
David
Not overly concerned - still running WHS V1 - Does all I need it to do - backups, media server, etc. I've done bare metal restores in the past, but now I install clean, as most of the data is kept on the WHS.
I have duplicated folders for the important stuff, BDBB for backup of the backups, a couple of external HDD's for monthly backups of everything, and everything that is REAL important is backed up to Zoolz.
I try and limit its access to the outside world.
Thanks for that @SepticSceptic
Although my home server is pretty self-contained, I do use the remote access feature regularly, which requires me to have a couple of ports forwarded to the server... I guess this changes the picture somewhat?
Twincamr2:
Thanks for that @SepticSceptic
Although my home server is pretty self-contained, I do use the remote access feature regularly, which requires me to have a couple of ports forwarded to the server... I guess this changes the picture somewhat?
What do you use remote access for ? Can it be accomplished via a VPN, or something more secure ?
SepticSceptic:
What do you use remote access for ? Can it be accomplished via a VPN, or something more secure ?
I use it solely for remote access to shared folders on the server, and occasionally for remote administration of the server. TBH I haven't really considered a third-party VPN solution, as the WHS 2011 option works so well (and I fully admit to being a noob when it comes to such things). Our FritxBox router has a VPN feature I could use, I suppose, but not having investigated it, I assume it's limited to file access. Would I need a static IP?
Twincamr2:
SepticSceptic:
What do you use remote access for ? Can it be accomplished via a VPN, or something more secure ?
I use it solely for remote access to shared folders on the server, and occasionally for remote administration of the server. TBH I haven't really considered a third-party VPN solution, as the WHS 2011 option works so well (and I fully admit to being a noob when it comes to such things). Our FritxBox router has a VPN feature I could use, I suppose, but not having investigated it, I assume it's limited to file access. Would I need a static IP?
You wont need a static IP, as you can get a dynamic DNS service - a setting you put in your router and will keep your internet presence with a DNS name, irrespective of your IP address. DynDNS is one service.
I rarely need any external access to my WHS, but when I do, I use TeamViewer ( or similar) to an always-on HTPC, and then RDP to WHS.
|
|
|