|
|
|
The conman who scammed punters out of $26 million with the Fyre Festival is out of jail and back, running the exact same con again.
neb:
The conman who scammed punters out of $26 million with the Fyre Festival is out of jail and back, running the exact same con again.
He has a simple motto: If they've been this stupid once, they're bound to be this stupid a second time. 🤣
Mod Emeritus @TonyHughes (good old Tony) brings up a valid issue and New Word Havelock North decides that is better to punish him.
It's like an IT security person bringing up an issue and instead of a company solving it, they accuse the person of "hacking".
New World store owner being a dick.
Referral links: Quic Broadband (free setup code: R587125ERQ6VE) | Samsung | AliExpress | Wise | Sharesies
Support Geekzone by subscribing (browse ads-free), or making a one-off or recurring donation through PressPatron.
freitasm:
Mod Emeritus @TonyHughes (good old Tony) brings up a valid issue and New Word Havelock North decides that is better to punish him.
It's like an IT security person bringing up an issue and instead of a company solving it, they accuse the person of "hacking".
New World store owner being a dick.
Reddit thread here about it - https://www.reddit.com/r/newzealand/comments/1iyy5bj/hawkes_bay_man_absolutely_flabbergasted_after/
freitasm:
It's like an IT security person bringing up an issue and instead of a company solving it, they accuse the person of "hacking“.
You won't believe it, but I've been through this before. However, one had messed with the wrong person. 😁
This is a photo I took of their DC many moons ago. Managers only pretended to care.

Convincing any kind of Operations that a safety issue takes precedence over a productivity/laziness/cost/change control issue is always very hard. Usually requires either head office or an outside force.
MadEngineer:
This is a photo I took of their DC many moons ago. Managers only pretended to care.
If this happens several times in our company, it is a reason for dismissal for the manager responsible in this area after a warning.
Tinkerisk: If this happens several times in our company, it is a reason for dismissal for the manager responsible in this area after a warning.
There's even a training film about this sort of thing. May need to use Youtube subtitles, I'm not sure if there's an English-dubbed version.
You can see how seriously people take this, it's had over a million views.
Should add a warning, NSFW after about 4 minutes in.
MadEngineer:
This is a photo I took of their DC many moons ago. Managers only pretended to care.
But you see, there's no marking "Fire Exit" on that door, so they can't be blamed!
/s
Referral links: Quic Broadband (free setup code: R587125ERQ6VE) | Samsung | AliExpress | Wise | Sharesies
Support Geekzone by subscribing (browse ads-free), or making a one-off or recurring donation through PressPatron.
Tinkerisk:
neb:
The conman who scammed punters out of $26 million with the Fyre Festival is out of jail and back, running the exact same con again.
He has a simple motto: If they've been this stupid once, they're bound to be this stupid a second time. 🤣
Handsome Dan Has Spoken.
Handsome Dan needs to stop adding three dots to every sentence...
Handsome Dan does not currently have a side hustle as the mascot for Yale
*Gladly accepting donations...
Mine does too, in theory. Meanwhile the department that tells us we're not allowed to wear jandals in the office often wears jandals in the office.
cddt:
I am glad to work somewhere which takes safety seriously...
Place I worked at a few years ago had one of those 'in emergency only' exits. Fire alarm went off so down the stairs and out that door I went. Turned out, rather expectedly, to be a drill . Subsequently got told off by property or facilities or some such, for using that door, telling me it was for emergencies only...go figure.
Sometimes I use big words I don't always fully understand in an effort to make myself sound more photosynthesis.
|
|
|