MikeB4:
Handle9: They followed the rules presented to them.
You can get basically nothing out of the forestry industry and put everyone involved out of work or you can get nothing out of the forestry industry.
Up to you.
Again that is BS. So by your claim nothing should done to industries that are killing people and or causing immense damage to infrastructure land and waterways. hmm now lets think are there industries that have been required to change?
Auto industry required to change design and compulsory installation of safety equipment, EG Seat beats, design of front end to protect pedestrians
Building industry, banning of asbestos, earthquake mitigation.
All industries, emmission controls.
Toy and infant equipment, must meet strict child safety regulations.
Drug Industry, must meet strict safety regulations.
Shall we go on. How many of those industries are still going strongly? Why should the forestry industry be exempt from this scrutiny, legal requirement and responsibility regarding environmental damage and human life? What gives the forestry some kind of right to destroy large swathes of countryside and waterways, destroys homes and businesses and take lives.
I don't think Handle9 is suggesting that change isn't necessary or won't be forthcoming. I think he's just stating that there will be no retribution against the forestry industry as they complied with the regulations that were in place at the time of the event.




