|
|
|
Guv: Heard through the grapevine that this has been dropped..
Will be interesting to see if they've made a bit for the UFB extension, my thoughts are that they will have..
Guv: Heard through the grapevine that this has been dropped..
DonGould:
I think the point being made is that this community isn't affording a product build on a $20 wholesale cost, so they're defiantly not going to afford a product built on a $37 wholesale price.
What's the business case for UFB with only 50% uptake?
DonGould:Guv: Heard through the grapevine that this has been dropped..
So do they have a new plan for getting the internet to the homes that aren't currently affording it?
Ray Taylor
There is no place like localhost
Spreadsheet for Comparing Electricity Plans Here
Guv: Heard through the grapevine that this has been dropped..
raytaylor:DonGould:Guv: Heard through the grapevine that this has been dropped..
So do they have a new plan for getting the internet to the homes that aren't currently affording it?
There is no plan.
UFB is more important, helps create jobs and has a greater return on the investment of the man-hours put in by council staff
Affordability and free wifi can come later.
Creating jobs for the unemployed is more important than giving them free wifi.
Ragnor:DonGould:
I think the point being made is that this community isn't affording a product build on a $20 wholesale cost, so they're defiantly not going to afford a product built on a $37 wholesale price.
What's the business case for UFB with only 50% uptake?
Then surely they can't afford $22/month more rates + whatever price it would be for this metro wifi either. That's assuming a working cost effective wifi solution could actually be delivered.
quickymart:Guv: Heard through the grapevine that this has been dropped..
Probably for the best.
DonGould:Ragnor:DonGould:
I think the point being made is that this community isn't affording a product build on a $20 wholesale cost, so they're defiantly not going to afford a product built on a $37 wholesale price.
What's the business case for UFB with only 50% uptake?
Then surely they can't afford $22/month more rates + whatever price it would be for this metro wifi either. That's assuming a working cost effective wifi solution could actually be delivered.
Ragnor in response to your comment I've bolded the key word in the comment you responded to.
The issue here isn't about anyones ability to afford service. In my view it's about their willingness to afford it.
The knock on of this unwillingness is that these people become digitally disadvantaged.
Gordy
My first ever AM radio network connection was with a 1MHz AM crystal(OA91) radio receiver.
DonGould:quickymart:Guv: Heard through the grapevine that this has been dropped..
Probably for the best.
Can you, and the two other people who supported your comment, explain why this is for the best?
If people aren't affording copper now, why is it best that a community offering isn't provided?
Gordy
My first ever AM radio network connection was with a 1MHz AM crystal(OA91) radio receiver.
Gordy7: Children today are using fast internet at schools.
They won't want to come home and extend their education on a poor internet connection.
Todays children will be residents tomorrow who may want to work from home with a good internet service.
DonGould: If the internet is 'free' like the water is in New Zealand then perhaps the horses might start to drink it.
Hmmmm
|
|
|