Geekzone: technology news, blogs, forums
Guest
Welcome Guest.
You haven't logged in yet. If you don't have an account you can register now.


taniwha

961 posts

Ultimate Geek

Trusted

#397 8-Aug-2003 09:34
Send private message

yes, cdma is better protocol, and makes sense in ohms and hertz..
but you can't get around the phones sucking.

only recently have real cellphone manufacturers started producing cdma phones, and most 027s on the market are still from companies that had never made a mobile phone before CDMA arrived.

there are so many shocking cdma phones availble, with software bugs, and near unusuable interfaces. phones that die suddently and spontanesly fry their flash rom. some phones that turn off when you open the flip..

the reason i see cdma as such a bad idea is it isn't really a real standard, it's just a great protocol that's patented and pushed by one company. GSM on the other hand is the world's cellphone platform. and in telecommunation we need open and widely accepted standards otherwise things just don't work. Having one company controlling what you can and cannot do on CDMA is what (to me) is holding back CDMA

right now, how many things can i do on CDMA that i can't do on GSM?
i can ionstantly think of a dozen things i can do on GSM that CDMA just can't do, because nobody is making the technology work on CDMA.

Create new topic
skyplonk
460 posts

Ultimate Geek
+1 received by user: 56

Trusted

  #964 8-Aug-2003 13:36
Send private message

Hi,

yes, cdma is better protocol, and makes sense in ohms and hertz..
but you can't get around the phones sucking.


Only in New Zealand. If you look at the States and Aisa the CDMA networks and Handset's are light years ahead.


only recently have real cellphone manufacturers started producing cdma phones, and most 027s on the market are still from companies that had never made a mobile phone before CDMA arrived.

Nokia, Motorola have made CDMA Phone's in the past. Samsung who sell more handsets worlwide than Ericsson also have produced CDMA devices for years. You also have to remember that CDMA as a standard is a baby compared to the age of GSM. Also just look at the sharp GX10 for a phone by a company that does not make phone. It is rubbish.


there are so many shocking cdma phones availble, with software bugs, and near unusuable interfaces. phones that die suddently and spontanesly fry their flash rom. some phones that turn off when you open the flip..

H610E and H310E. But we have to ask our self, was that telecom's choice to get those handets? Trying to meet a price point? They are not worse to use than the old One Touch Easy and Max phone's by alcatel.

the reason i see cdma as such a bad idea is it isn't really a real standard, it's just a great protocol that's patented and pushed by one company. GSM on the other hand is the world's cellphone platform. and in telecommunation we need open and widely accepted standards otherwise things just don't work. Having one company controlling what you can and cannot do on CDMA is what (to me) is holding back CDMA

GSM only lead's because GSM has been around alot longer than CDMA has commericaley.
And W-CDMA is a Qualcom backed and wide band version of CDMA 1XRTT and EV-DO or EV-DV. So GSM is going CDMA in any case...


Peter

Create new topic








Geekzone Live »

Try automatic live updates from Geekzone directly in your browser, without refreshing the page, with Geekzone Live now.



Are you subscribed to our RSS feed? You can download the latest headlines and summaries from our stories directly to your computer or smartphone by using a feed reader.