|
|
|
LennonNZ: There are MANY places which cannot get Telecom Broadband in New Zealand for many reasons under the sun and just because they cannot get Telecom Broadband (but broadband another way) they will not be able to use the TiVo to its full extent.
LennonNZ: Do any other countries who have TiVo limit you to the ISP's you are allowed to connect to to use their service? in AU certain ISP's will zero rate the data yes but they (TiVo) don't tell you you have to actually connect to those ISP's to get the content via them.
bcourtney:kingjj: How is this any different than WxC zero rating traffic for GamePlanet? Or Orcon zero rating traffic from TVNZ on Demand? Or Telstraclear zero rating traffic to its gaming servers? Telecom has the most broadband customers in New Zealand. It makes economical sense for Telecom to host the service and zero rate it for their customers, it will therefore have the greatest reach and Tivo will be able to advertise itself to the biggest broadband market in New Zealand. It would be a waste for them to go with one of the smaller players.
None of this contributes to a valid argument. The issue here isn't that the data is only zero rated if Telecom is your ISP, it's that you don't have access to this side of the TiVo services unless your ISP is Telecom.
Zero-rated or not, I'm sure that there are people out there that would have liked the choice to access the online services provided by the TiVo box regardless of their ISP.
Will be interesting to see whether or not this becomes and anti-competitive case or not. Personally it doesn't bother me as there isn't anything that appeals to me with TiVo but I can imagine there are those that can see a case against TiVo/HybridTV for anti-competitiveness (kind of like if telcos locked phones to their networks I'd have thought...)
burtz: You only have to ask sky users how many watch the ridiculously priced pay per view movies. Telecom will do exactly the same and price it out of the market and why should they care - the profit potential for Tivo is minimal for them.
Why not team with a hungry ISP like Orcon or Worldxchange who need the extra revenue?
Balchy:burtz: You only have to ask sky users how many watch the ridiculously priced pay per view movies. Telecom will do exactly the same and price it out of the market and why should they care - the profit potential for Tivo is minimal for them.
Why not team with a hungry ISP like Orcon or Worldxchange who need the extra revenue?
Umm maybe because of the fact that they need extra revenue in the first place, and have a smaller customer base.
Lets see how that would work in the mind of Tivo.
"Hey Mr Ceo, I was thinking, we could partner with Telecom, who have the biggest customer base, and who consistantly post a profit, or I have another fantastic idea! Lets partner with this ISP over here, they look like they are underperforming and could use a boost, not to mention less customer, so we can have more targetted marketing!"
What one would you choose?
bcourtney:Balchy:burtz: You only have to ask sky users how many watch the ridiculously priced pay per view movies. Telecom will do exactly the same and price it out of the market and why should they care - the profit potential for Tivo is minimal for them.
Why not team with a hungry ISP like Orcon or Worldxchange who need the extra revenue?
Umm maybe because of the fact that they need extra revenue in the first place, and have a smaller customer base.
Lets see how that would work in the mind of Tivo.
"Hey Mr Ceo, I was thinking, we could partner with Telecom, who have the biggest customer base, and who consistantly post a profit, or I have another fantastic idea! Lets partner with this ISP over here, they look like they are underperforming and could use a boost, not to mention less customer, so we can have more targetted marketing!"
What one would you choose?
Seriously? I'd have my content availble to everyone, no matter what ISP they use. Just like they do in Australia. Sure, they come to some agreement with Telecom whereby Telecom zero-rate the data. This shouldn't mean that all other ISPs are locked out of access to the content anyway though. Very anti-competitive.
Let's be fair, TiVo AU/NZ is not performing that well at all. Well behind on expectations and yet they choose to shoot themselves in the foot further?
My feeling is that Telecom will have asked for exclusive rights for 12 months in exchange for a reduced revenue-share scenario (or perhaps flagging revenue sharing completely)
Balchy: And again, based on your last two sentances, is that not a good business decision, to go with one main partner to increase your own revenue share when your overall business is not performing?
It also makes a lot of business sense to start small and slowly increase the scale of your offering. It reduces your intial overheads, gives you time to adjust your offerings to suit the markets, and allows you to test the water for demand and viability before you roll it out full scale.
I dont really see it as anticompetative, its just another service thats being provided, its not anti competitive for telstraclear to provide its tv service, it wasnt anti competative in the past for telecom to partner with sky...
Just because every business cant provide a service you want doesnt automatically make it anticompetetive
bazzer: I think what Balchy is saying is that it probably worked well for TiVo too. Telecom would have had to cut a pretty good deal for the exclusivity I would have thought, one that benefits TiVo as much as Telecom. Obviously, we're not privy to the details so we may never know.
MattJ: How could limiting yourself to one ISP possibly be better than allowing anyone to have access to your service?
Saves me waiting for TiVo though.
rugrat: "Let's be fair, TiVo AU/NZ is not performing that well at all. Well behind on expectations and yet they choose to shoot themselves in the foot further?"
Is TiVo in Australia zero traffic rated with any isp over there?
|
|
|