Geekzone: technology news, blogs, forums
Welcome Guest.
You haven't logged in yet. If you don't have an account you can register now.


651 posts

Ultimate Geek
+1 received by user: 148

Topic # 193775 23-Mar-2016 19:30
Send private message

About time we scanned all our old film photos (not negatives - who knows where they are).  Mostly in albums, and there are lots, so I don't like the idea of paying $0.30 per photo that some services charge.


I have a DSLR but understand that it's not a foulproof method to set up a DSLR scanning station.


I was considering buying a small all in one printer/scanner and was wondering on the general quality.  I haven't scanned photos for 10 years, our old scanner then was very slow.  I presume most are all fairly quick these days?




Does anyone have any good software recommendations that can scan, say, 4 photos at once, separate them out automatically etc.?




Anyone have any general recomendations?

Create new topic
14284 posts

Uber Geek
+1 received by user: 2590


  Reply # 1518626 23-Mar-2016 19:36
Send private message

Scanner over DSLR for sure, otherwise you have to cope with reflections and such. I have a brother color laser, it's not that fast, but it's not awful. Can't help with software, but interested what people say - even for basic scanning the software that comes with printers is usually adequate at best.

AWS Certified Solution Architect Professional, Sysop Administrator Associate, and Developer Associate
TOGAF certified enterprise architect
Professional photographer

1748 posts

Uber Geek
+1 received by user: 361


  Reply # 1520483 27-Mar-2016 18:20
Send private message

I cheated - I borrowed a Kodak i2400 scanner. 20 photos per minute ....


Nearly 4,000 photos later (mostly my wife's), nearly finished ... would have gone further insane doing them on a flatbed ...


then there is my parents 300-odd slides ....

My thoughts are no longer my own and is probably representative of our media-controlled government


247 posts

Master Geek
+1 received by user: 39

  Reply # 1525039 3-Apr-2016 09:13
Send private message

If you have the actual photos, rather then negatives makes the whole process easier. Cheap scanner beds, scanning photos will get much better results then a cheap negative scanner.




The more expensive printers have auto feeders for scanning, but a lot of them will only take A4, if you can find one that takes 6x4's will make life much easier.




Expect to have to do a bit of editing in software afterwards if you want perfect results.

Create new topic

Twitter »

Follow us to receive Twitter updates when new discussions are posted in our forums:

Follow us to receive Twitter updates when news items and blogs are posted in our frontpage:

Follow us to receive Twitter updates when tech item prices are listed in our price comparison site:

Geekzone Live »

Try automatic live updates from Geekzone directly in your browser, without refreshing the page, with Geekzone Live now.

Are you subscribed to our RSS feed? You can download the latest headlines and summaries from our stories directly to your computer or smartphone by using a feed reader.

Alternatively, you can receive a daily email with Geekzone updates.