Geekzone: technology news, blogs, forums
Guest
Welcome Guest.
You haven't logged in yet. If you don't have an account you can register now.


sxz

sxz

761 posts

Ultimate Geek
+1 received by user: 194


#193775 23-Mar-2016 19:30
Send private message

About time we scanned all our old film photos (not negatives - who knows where they are).  Mostly in albums, and there are lots, so I don't like the idea of paying $0.30 per photo that some services charge.

 

I have a DSLR but understand that it's not a foulproof method to set up a DSLR scanning station.

 

I was considering buying a small all in one printer/scanner and was wondering on the general quality.  I haven't scanned photos for 10 years, our old scanner then was very slow.  I presume most are all fairly quick these days?

 

 

 

Does anyone have any good software recommendations that can scan, say, 4 photos at once, separate them out automatically etc.?

 

 

 

Anyone have any general recomendations?


Create new topic
timmmay
20858 posts

Uber Geek
+1 received by user: 5350

Trusted
Lifetime subscriber

  #1518626 23-Mar-2016 19:36
Send private message

Scanner over DSLR for sure, otherwise you have to cope with reflections and such. I have a brother color laser, it's not that fast, but it's not awful. Can't help with software, but interested what people say - even for basic scanning the software that comes with printers is usually adequate at best.




SepticSceptic
2263 posts

Uber Geek
+1 received by user: 779

Trusted

  #1520483 27-Mar-2016 18:20
Send private message

I cheated - I borrowed a Kodak i2400 scanner. 20 photos per minute ....

 

Nearly 4,000 photos later (mostly my wife's), nearly finished ... would have gone further insane doing them on a flatbed ...

 

then there is my parents 300-odd slides ....


RileyB
247 posts

Master Geek
+1 received by user: 39


  #1525039 3-Apr-2016 09:13
Send private message

If you have the actual photos, rather then negatives makes the whole process easier. Cheap scanner beds, scanning photos will get much better results then a cheap negative scanner.

 

 

 

The more expensive printers have auto feeders for scanning, but a lot of them will only take A4, if you can find one that takes 6x4's will make life much easier.

 

 

 

Expect to have to do a bit of editing in software afterwards if you want perfect results.






Create new topic








Geekzone Live »

Try automatic live updates from Geekzone directly in your browser, without refreshing the page, with Geekzone Live now.



Are you subscribed to our RSS feed? You can download the latest headlines and summaries from our stories directly to your computer or smartphone by using a feed reader.