Geekzone: technology news, blogs, forums
Guest
Welcome Guest.
You haven't logged in yet. If you don't have an account you can register now.


D.W

D.W

747 posts

Ultimate Geek
+1 received by user: 91


#273378 19-Aug-2020 12:35
Send private message

Hoping to get some advice on this, we've made an offer on a house which has partial monolithic cladding, built 1994 in Christchurch.

 

The building inspector highlighted this as a 'risk', however I believe moisture tests were OK (I haven't received full report at this stage, so this is just based on preliminary conversation).

 

I believe that I may not have grounds to walk away from the purchase based solely on future risk, so I just want to be fully aware of what to expect if I were to have issues (or whether its better to try mitigate the issues sooner).

 

The extent of the cladding can be seen here: https://trademe.tmcdn.co.nz/photoserver/plus/1377440168.jpg

 

and here: https://trademe.tmcdn.co.nz/photoserver/plus/1377440171.jpg

 

Anybody have any advice/suggestions? I'm a bit anxious to be honest, but I've spoken to others who have said it wouldn't bother them based on the moisture tests being OK, and the reasonably small amount of this type of cladding on the house.

 

 

 

 


Create new topic
nickb800
2735 posts

Uber Geek
+1 received by user: 829

Trusted

  #2544419 19-Aug-2020 13:19
Send private message

Yes, it would be in a slightly higher risk category being a risky era, monlithic clad, no eaves, and (probably) untreated timber. However, it doesn't have super-risky features like parpets or decks over rooms.

 

Is it connected to neighouring units? That may complicate eventual repairs/recladding. 

 

 

 

Sounds like you are pretty well committed, so I guess it's just a case of being vigilant and keeping a rainy day fund. Depending on what the building report says and how thorough it was, you could commission a specialist weathertightness inspector (possibly IR camera or invasive inspection if permitted) to look for an 'out'. See what your lawyer says - what sort of evidence it would take to walk away from the contract. If the inspector finds something bad, it may be grounds to walk away, if they say it looks good, then you would have to go through with the purchase but gain peace of mind. 




D.W

D.W

747 posts

Ultimate Geek
+1 received by user: 91


  #2544421 19-Aug-2020 13:21
Send private message

Thanks, not connected to neighbouring units. Yes some peace of mind would come from not being able to walk away because everything is OK. And we don't really want to walk away as the house otherwise ticks all the boxes for us.


wellygary
8810 posts

Uber Geek
+1 received by user: 5287


  #2544436 19-Aug-2020 13:41
Send private message

Talk to the neighbour... It looks like the one next door has been reclad?....

 

Also , you might also get pinged to bring the insulation up to current code if you are taking the external cladding off.... (pretty sure the requirements have been increased since the '90s)




tieke
687 posts

Ultimate Geek
+1 received by user: 256

ID Verified

  #2544442 19-Aug-2020 13:47
Send private message

Interesting that the matching place next door seems to have weatherboards instead - was that a design option at construction time or have they had to replace theirs? Might be worth asking them.


Create new topic








Geekzone Live »

Try automatic live updates from Geekzone directly in your browser, without refreshing the page, with Geekzone Live now.



Are you subscribed to our RSS feed? You can download the latest headlines and summaries from our stories directly to your computer or smartphone by using a feed reader.