empacher48:

 

Fred99:

 

For starters, "living with the virus" is going to mean condemning a significant number of the vulnerable in our population to live in isolation - not much better than prison.  Otherwise the truth is far from "living with the virus" - but condemning the vulnerable to be "dying with the virus".

 

So what you’re saying here is that you would prefer large numbers of the population to be kept prisoners in their homes and in isolation, which is happening now with alert level 3 and 4. To prevent the small number of people ineligible or anti-vax from getting sick?

You would prefer the government to borrow $1 billion a week to keep the vast majority of businesses and people employed, because they are kept prisoners in their own homes to protect the small number of ineligible and anti-vax people?

We are getting close to the point where the needs of the many outweigh the needs of the few.

 

Jesus, no one is a prisoner. No one is kept home to protect ineligible and anti-vax. We are being at home to protect everyone - including you. At the moment we don't have enough vaccinated people. Once we have it, things change. But some can't see it past their political mindset.

Locked out of this sub-forum.