Geekzone: technology news, blogs, forums
Guest
Welcome Guest.
You haven't logged in yet. If you don't have an account you can register now.


View this topic in a long page with up to 500 replies per page Create new topic
1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 | 7

gzt

gzt

17344 posts

Uber Geek
+1 received by user: 6349

Lifetime subscriber

  #1547996 7-May-2016 14:50
Send private message

For me the EV advantage would be saving $2500 yearly average in fuel expenditure, maintenance, and the pleasure of never visiting a gas station.

The environmental advantages are less CO2, less brake dust, less background noise, less hydrocarbon emission, less oil changes. This is likely to result in health benefits in some areas.

In recognition of this I would be happy to see things like half rate parking in council buildings provided this does not impact other users of the service.

Norway has a massive range of incentives that we cannot reproduce here, but I think it is worth throwing around some further ideas on the possible incentives we would find acceptable and practical in our cities and towns.

The government package is a great start.




Talkiet
4796 posts

Uber Geek
+1 received by user: 3889

Trusted

  #1548013 7-May-2016 16:29
Send private message

timbosan:

 

Lias:

 

What the government needs to do is stop ACC from bending motorcyclists over with the exorbitant levy scam they have going on. Electric cars are just as bad as petrol/diesel cars from a traffic congestion and parking point of view, the more people on motorcycles the better yet ACC is determined to drive people away from bikes.

 



+1 on this - I ride a scooter to work and 99% of the traffic I pass (which is cars stuck at lights or motorway on-ramps) is single-person-in-a-car stuff.  And the amount I pay for rego on a 150cc scooter is way more than I pay on my 3.2 litre car, which just don't make sense!

 

 

 

 

Unless you actually look at the components of the Rego fee, in which case it does make sense.

 

 

 

Cheers - N

 

 





Please note all comments are from my own brain and don't necessarily represent the position or opinions of my employer, previous employers, colleagues, friends or pets.


Talkiet
4796 posts

Uber Geek
+1 received by user: 3889

Trusted

  #1548015 7-May-2016 16:38
Send private message

Dratsab:

 

I like how everyone claims electric cars to be environmentally friendly. The lithium batteries they use and the processes required to produce lithium are anything but environmentally friendly. Can't see the greenies giving up their mobile phones, or even protesting about things such as this, anytime soon though.

 

 

 

[snip]

 

 

 

All that aside, I agree - EV's in bus lanes is a dumb idea.

 

 

 

 

I don't understand why you talk about lithium and then post a picture  of a copper mine ( http://www.mining.com/bhp-rio-anglo-fear-effects-of-chiles-new-labour-bill-59481/ ) and a diamond mine ( http://gizmodo.com/the-nearly-mile-wide-diamond-mine-that-helped-build-the-1593234924 )

 

Here's a lithium 'mine' 

 

 

 

 

Cheers - N

 

 





Please note all comments are from my own brain and don't necessarily represent the position or opinions of my employer, previous employers, colleagues, friends or pets.




jarledb
Webhead
3274 posts

Uber Geek
+1 received by user: 1917

Moderator
ID Verified
Trusted
Lifetime subscriber

  #1548016 7-May-2016 16:47
Send private message

There have been few electric car fires so far. But they do happen, and with the Tesla Model S the end result can look horrifying

 

 

The battery fires in the kind of battery packs used in the Tesla are hard to extinguish, but they burn slowly and have not caused any deaths to date.

 

According to this article there has been no casualties in EV fires: http://insideevs.com/number-of-fire-related-deaths-per-year-caused-by-evs/

 

AND the number of EV fires are significantly less than fires in ICEs. Those fires are actually deadly. So if a volunteer want to stay safe, he or she should probably stay away from regular ICE fires.

 

Wikipedia article about EV fires - with a section about the fire you can see the result of in the picture above:

 

A fire occurred in a Tesla Model S charging at a Tesla Supercharger in Norway on January 1, 2016. The fire was slow, and the owner had time to unplug the car and retrieve possesions. An investigation by the Norwegian Accident Investigation Board (AIBN) indicated that the fire originated in the car, but was otherwise inconclusive. In March 2016, Tesla stated that their own investigation into the incident concluded that the fire was caused by a short circuit in the vehicle's distribution box, but that the amount of damage prevented them from determining the exact cause. Tesla stated that the Supercharger detected the short circuit and deactivated, and a future Model S software update would stop the vehicle from charging if a short circuit is detected.





Jarle Dahl Bergersen | Referral Links: Want $50 off when you join Octopus Energy? Use this referral code
Are you happy with what you get from Geekzone? Please consider supporting us by making a donation or subscribing.


sleemanj
1491 posts

Uber Geek
+1 received by user: 283


  #1548019 7-May-2016 17:04
Send private message

Talkiet:Here's a lithium 'mine' 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

As "tidy" as Lithium extraction can appear, unfortunately, Lithium isn't the only constituent of a typical Lithium Ion battery, we also have to consider the Cobalt primarily.  

 

Let's be clear Cobalt is a problem, Lithium may be less of one, but necessitating getting any constituents for our power source out of the ground is a problem, whether it's oil or Li/Ni/Co/Al/Mn.... they all have environmental and some of them serious societal issues.

 

Right now, all we can do, is pick a lesser evil.

 

Bring on cold fusion.

 

 





---
James Sleeman
I sell lots of stuff for electronic enthusiasts...


Batman
Mad Scientist
29827 posts

Uber Geek
+1 received by user: 6089

Trusted
Lifetime subscriber

  #1548021 7-May-2016 17:10
Send private message

jarledb:


There have been few electric car fires so far. But they do happen, and with the Tesla Model S the end result can look horrifying



The battery fires in the kind of battery packs used in the Tesla are hard to extinguish, but they burn slowly and have not caused any deaths to date.


According to this article there has been no casualties in EV fires: http://insideevs.com/number-of-fire-related-deaths-per-year-caused-by-evs/


AND the number of EV fires are significantly less than fires in ICEs. Those fires are actually deadly. So if a volunteer want to stay safe, he or she should probably stay away from regular ICE fires.


Wikipedia article about EV fires - with a section about the fire you can see the result of in the picture above:


A fire occurred in a Tesla Model S charging at a Tesla Supercharger in Norway on January 1, 2016. The fire was slow, and the owner had time to unplug the car and retrieve possesions. An investigation by the Norwegian Accident Investigation Board (AIBN) indicated that the fire originated in the car, but was otherwise inconclusive. In March 2016, Tesla stated that their own investigation into the incident concluded that the fire was caused by a short circuit in the vehicle's distribution box, but that the amount of damage prevented them from determining the exact cause. Tesla stated that the Supercharger detected the short circuit and deactivated, and a future Model S software update would stop the vehicle from charging if a short circuit is detected.



No doubt that fire near a tank of gasoline is as deadly as it gets if and when that fuel ignites.

I specifically mentioned fire because unlike ICE fire, there is an additional hazard of Li-ion battery fire - highly toxic fumes in an enclosed chamber. I guess a fire extinguisher isn't going to solve that problem. What is important in my ignorance, could be a 100% fire proof wall which is also 100% air tight (remember the toxic fumes) between battery pack and passenger cell.


jarledb
Webhead
3274 posts

Uber Geek
+1 received by user: 1917

Moderator
ID Verified
Trusted
Lifetime subscriber

  #1548315 8-May-2016 13:55
Send private message

sleemanj:

 

As "tidy" as Lithium extraction can appear, unfortunately, Lithium isn't the only constituent of a typical Lithium Ion battery, we also have to consider the Cobalt primarily. 

 

Let's be clear Cobalt is a problem, Lithium may be less of one, but necessitating getting any constituents for our power source out of the ground is a problem, whether it's oil or Li/Ni/Co/Al/Mn.... they all have environmental and some of them serious societal issues.

 

Right now, all we can do, is pick a lesser evil.

 

Bring on cold fusion.

 

 

Hehe, right now electricity is the lesser evil, even when it is produced by coal it gives a lesser CO2 fotprint than oil. The lithium battery packs used by the likes of Tesla is not going to get thrown away, not even after they reach their end of life in the cars. Its nowhere near "use once and its gone" as is the case with oil.

 

Want to see something horrific in how we produce oil some places on the earth? Look into what fracking causes of pollution, or look at the "beautiful" picture of oil sand production

 





Jarle Dahl Bergersen | Referral Links: Want $50 off when you join Octopus Energy? Use this referral code
Are you happy with what you get from Geekzone? Please consider supporting us by making a donation or subscribing.


 
 
 
 

Shop now for Lenovo laptops and other devices (affiliate link).
nakedmolerat
4629 posts

Uber Geek
+1 received by user: 874

Trusted
Lifetime subscriber

  #1548380 8-May-2016 19:37
Send private message

jarledb:

 

There have been few electric car fires so far. But they do happen, and with the Tesla Model S the end result can look horrifying

 

 

 

 

 

I am all for electric cars until I saw this! Lucky that the owner was quick.

 

That is so creepy. The car just melt...

 

Anyway, I am looking at retiring my 2013 car sometimes this year or next. I will pass EV cars for now. I was actually planning to drop the deposit for Tesla but might not bother about it for now.


blackjack17
1711 posts

Uber Geek
+1 received by user: 864


  #1548382 8-May-2016 19:40
Send private message

nakedmolerat:

 

jarledb:

 

There have been few electric car fires so far. But they do happen, and with the Tesla Model S the end result can look horrifying

 

 

 

 

 

I am all for electric cars until I saw this! Lucky that the owner was quick.

 

That is so creepy. The car just melt...

 

Anyway, I am looking at retiring my 2013 car sometimes this year or next. I will pass EV cars for now. I was actually planning to drop the deposit for Tesla but might not bother about it for now.

 

 

 

 

Petrol cars burn too

 

 

 





MikeAqua
7787 posts

Uber Geek
+1 received by user: 3623


  #1548606 9-May-2016 11:26
Send private message

Public transport should still be preferable to EVs for the daily commute.  If EVs add to congestion this will increase emissions from conventional vehicles, possibly offsetting the benefits of EVs.

 

With that in mind EVs shouldn't be in bus lanes or have unconditional access to car pool lanes or be provided free parking.

 

If govt want to incentivise EVs, they need to address new purchase price. 

 

Using the Audi example: The EV costs $20k more $20k buys ~10,000L of petrol which would allow ~100,000km of travel i.e. 5 to 10 years motoring.

 

We don't have a sizeable tax from which to make EVs exempt.  So govt needs to subsidise them in some way if they want to encourage uptake before the technology matures enoguh to become competitive.

 

Forget private consumers. Fleet purchases make up about three quarters of new vehicle sales in NZ. 

 

What govt could do is firstly buy EVs itself and secondly support EV purchase via a company tax credit or extra depreciation allowance to remove the extra capital cost of an EV (which would flow through to leased cars).  No-one is going to buy an EV instead of a ute or van, but they are a sensible replacement for small passenger vehicles. 

 

Get fleets preferentially buying EVs and eventually a good chunk of consumers will have to buy EVs if they want near new vehicles. 





Mike


RUKI
1402 posts

Uber Geek
+1 received by user: 415


  #1548639 9-May-2016 12:14
Send private message

I can see here a business opportunity for geeks to come up with the solution to help the law enforcing authority. (I will accept a donation for the idea if you make it happen :-)):

 

How AT who send their folks with HD cams to record upcoming traffic on the bus lane will know that the "offender" is not an EV?

 

The only way to tell that it is not a EV conversion (we have those pure EV conversions in NZ) is by checking the LP in the database.

 

I do not believe their stock cams near the bus lanes are streaming video to some sort of the LP recognition server (e..g TOLL systems).

 

Which means that regardless of what that "incentive" it trying to address - it will come with the cost of processing the data to make decision: "was it an EV?"

 

----- To address other questions raised here---:

 

15000 hybrids and 1000 EVs registered so far. Taxi drivers in Co-op are now mandated to have no older than 5 y.o. Camry Hybrid and nothing else. With that EV incentive - taxi could use the new rule and shift to EVs. Leaf is enough to do the round trip to/from Airport and if you have two Leafs (at a cost of one new Camry) - one is charging one in operation - you are turning cash very fast.

 

As for the first response guides and some paramedics not being trained - every manufacturer has those published. I can tell for Toyota ones as I have majority of them. Lack of training has nothing to do with the requirement to do your job properly and safely.

 

Traction batteries in Toyota hybrids and in Leaf (as I have hands on experience with them) - I can tell that the safety is basically the same - two main relays inside the pack cut HV power and there should be no presence of the High Voltage in the fail safe mode following the accident.

 

It is known fact that in traction batteries those relays could sometimes fail and stuck in closed position. Part of the standard procedure is to remove (wearing PPE) the safety plug (orange or green/orange in Leaf). Plug connects parts of the battery inside and when removed - breaks the circuit. Even if relays are stuck - by removing the plug you cut the output voltage from the pack. As long as that safety plug is not melted in fire - it is not that hard to remove the plug.


Batman
Mad Scientist
29827 posts

Uber Geek
+1 received by user: 6089

Trusted
Lifetime subscriber

  #1548646 9-May-2016 12:28
Send private message

You don't understand emergency responder paradigm.

They are not there to sacrifice themselves.

First and overriding rule is safety to them.

If they cannot be completely sure of their safety they won't touch the scene. That's other people's job. Eg fire service, Delta engineers, etc.

Obviously in a simple scene, there could be a standardised way like a modified tool you detect current on the door or don't bother ie should be fine. But in a mangled wreck I don't know how a volunteer is going to know if there are any live bits or not. As i said currently, they defer such unknowns to other services.

MikeAqua
7787 posts

Uber Geek
+1 received by user: 3623


  #1548724 9-May-2016 14:59
Send private message

How do they tell car isn't a bus?  By looking/listening. 

 

It will be obvious many makes/model aren't an EVs.

 

If in doubt then if it has an exhaust tail pipe it isn't an EV.   Could possibly automate this by looking for the heat signature of the exhaust outlet.

 

Or

 

Require a special EV sticker.  Driving in a bus lane with no EV sticker = big ticket.  EV Sticker on a car that isn't an EV = very big ticket.

 

I still think it's a bad idea to allow EVs in special lanes, but it is enforceable.

 

 

 

RUKI:

 

I can see here a business opportunity for geeks to come up with the solution to help the law enforcing authority. (I will accept a donation for the idea if you make it happen :-)):

 

How AT who send their folks with HD cams to record upcoming traffic on the bus lane will know that the "offender" is not an EV?

 

 

 





Mike


gzt

gzt

17344 posts

Uber Geek
+1 received by user: 6349

Lifetime subscriber

  #1548733 9-May-2016 15:22
Send private message

MikeAqua:

Public transport should still be preferable to EVs for the daily commute.  If EVs add to congestion this will increase emissions from conventional vehicles, possibly offsetting the benefits of EVs.


With that in mind EVs shouldn't be in bus lanes or have unconditional access to car pool lanes or be provided free parking.


If govt want to incentivise EVs, they need to address new purchase price. 


Using the Audi example: The EV costs $20k more $20k buys ~10,000L of petrol which would allow ~100,000km of travel i.e. 5 to 10 years motoring.


We don't have a sizeable tax from which to make EVs exempt.  So govt needs to subsidise them in some way if they want to encourage uptake before the technology matures enoguh to become competitive.


Forget private consumers. Fleet purchases make up about three quarters of new vehicle sales in NZ. 


What govt could do is firstly buy EVs itself and secondly support EV purchase via a company tax credit or extra depreciation allowance to remove the extra capital cost of an EV (which would flow through to leased cars).  No-one is going to buy an EV instead of a ute or van, but they are a sensible replacement for small passenger vehicles. 


Get fleets preferentially buying EVs and eventually a good chunk of consumers will have to buy EVs if they want near new vehicles. 


I'm guessing a large proportion of these vehicles will have higher range requirements than the current generation of EV. I suspect it is too early for fleet replacement. On the positive side PHEV are a partial solution to that issue and require almost the same infrastructure as EV.

Edit: Then last on the list HEV shares a similar technology platform with both EV and PHEV. Imho HEV should not be dismissed entirely. It brings the economy of scale for many similar components and lifecycle. Additionally some have potential for aftermarket P upgrade.

MikeAqua
7787 posts

Uber Geek
+1 received by user: 3623


  #1548734 9-May-2016 15:26
Send private message

If that is true then pure EVs won't happen to any significant extent in NZ.  Outside fleet purchases the new vehicle market is small ...

 

gzt:
I'm guessing a large proportion of these vehicles will have higher range requirements than the current generation of EV. I suspect it is too early for fleet replacement. On the positive side PHEV are a solution that issue and require almost the same infrastructure as EV.





Mike


1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 | 7
View this topic in a long page with up to 500 replies per page Create new topic








Geekzone Live »

Try automatic live updates from Geekzone directly in your browser, without refreshing the page, with Geekzone Live now.



Are you subscribed to our RSS feed? You can download the latest headlines and summaries from our stories directly to your computer or smartphone by using a feed reader.