Rikkitic:

 

6FIEND:

 

Although neither candidate is appealing, if I was eligible to vote I would likely be holding my nose and casting it Trump's way.

 

The reasons are:

 

1) Under Obama's presidency, the US has been sliding down the "world's best" rankings in just about every measure...  Clinton would see a continuation of those same policies.

 

2) Almost every single female that I know has been vocally pro-Clinton, but can't point to a single policy or thing that they like about her, except that she's a she.   That just makes me want to #facepalm

 

3) The US media (particularly the NY Times & Washington Post) declared loudly and very early on that they would do everything within their power to prevent Trump from being elected.  I've also noted similar tendencies in
NZ based coverage of the campaign.  This is entirely at-odds with their stated ethos of credibility, fairness and impartiality.

 

So yeah, it would mainly be a protest vote...

 

 

1. That started long before Obama. He has also had to contend with a Congress that would rather see America die than him succeed.

 

2. The single thing all women and many men like about Clinton is that she is not Trump. That alone is enough to make her the better candidate.

 

3. Credibility, fairness and impartiality in the media. Gee, where would we look for that? Fox, maybe?

 

 

 

If you want to cast a protest vote, try the Libertarians.

 

 

 

1. blame others for failings

2. attack opponent

3. distract with a strawman argument

Congratulations on such a concise object lesson ...straight from the DNC playbook.