Pumpedd:

 

tdgeek:

 

networkn:

 

tdgeek:

 

 

 

Did you miss it?   "Fault"  :-)

 

re Pike River, Its time we had the reports, in plain english that both sides based their decisions on. Its a pity when an issue that for a small few (families) turns into a media and regional bickering match. They don't really need that. What they need is closure, the memorial as mentioned here, but as I think you said, its all riven by grief, we dont really wanr to extend that any further

 

 

Haha good one re fault. 

 

The National Government tried their best to put the thing to bed. Labour and NZF and the Greens kept it going, and have given the families hope and a longer timeline, and this is why I feel they should be held accountable. 

 

 

 

 

If its defined as not safe then I agree. But we dont know anything as we have two sets of expert opinions, I think we all need to see the reports, then its doable, not doable and it can be put to rest, and whichever party is holding back the truth, be accountable

 

 

It has been deemed unsafe by a couple of high level Government Agency reports. The only reports that say it is safe are not in writing and conjecture by so-called overseas experts and Winston Peters.

 

Didnt Winston offer to go into the mine first without any more reports?

 

I see. So its only about National vs Labour again. Well it is the JA bashing thread, but the side topic falls into the same slippery slope.

I have never seen any so called overseas experts that do reports verbally and not in writing, maybe JA has tapes and not papers

And a Govt Agency that fell under the National Govt is fine? But not overseas experts that are apparently so called? And you know that what they said is not in writing, and everyone knows its only conjecture?

Nothing wrong with debate but this is totally anti Labour biased, I'd be a bit creative and hide some of that when saying the same concerns