mm1352000:

 

On the other hand, I think some have been too quick to put the speakers in boxes and slap labels on them. If you disagree with their views, I think pointing out and directly criticising specific things they say and do would be far more effective than the "no-platforming" approach (which in my opinion has given them far more publicity than they otherwise would have received).

 

Now lets see:

Coming on a political mission, to a multicultural and generally tolerant country to preach a message that multiculturalism is bad, preaching that some races are inferior to others, that "we" (white people) are under threat from "them" (who are already here) and that there's a deliberate formal policy of "white genocide" going on, that society should be run along authoritarian grounds, that women should know their place and keep to it - and stop bleating about things like being raped, that people desperate for asylum should be deliberately left to drown - that you should block their rescue.

So nope - put her in a box - she's a full-on fascist - there's really nothing to discuss. When individual issues are communicated by dog-whistle, lies and inaccuracies, symbols, and inactions rather than direct actions, and as it's a quasi-religious cult movement targeting "disaffected" morons to recruit, good luck arguing against their belief system.