Geekzone: technology news, blogs, forums
Guest
Welcome Guest.
You haven't logged in yet. If you don't have an account you can register now.


cjkbarnett

37 posts

Geek
+1 received by user: 18


#312784 16-May-2024 21:40
Send private message

Some backstory:

 

Been chasing an issue on my Emby media server for a while now (5-6 months to be exact), and have recently fixed it. I don't have many external users, but they always complained about buffering, and i couldn't figure it out.

 

To cut straight to the point - turns out all traffic going out via port 443 was throttled - see below . The top process is Cloudflare tunnels serving my emby server, the NGINX reverse proxy service what is normally serving Embyvia 443. Look at the difference! 

 

On the other end i am downloading the same file, one accessing it via emby Cloudflare tunnel, and one via NGINX, on a device outside my home network. look at that utilisation difference on the server! 

 

 

 

 

Now, i am just a hobbyist, and it took me a while to work it out, so bear with, but to me that looks like throttling occuring? The CF tunnel that uses port 7844 is is nearly maxing out my upload speed (peak times on 900/400) while the on "normal" NGINX way of serving my site via Port 443, it struggles to get past 8 - 15 Mbps, even when it's the only service running.
I also used IIS to serve my media server for a while, but that hit the same speeds, so that leads me to believe its a port issue?

 

Now to my question - does Quic (or any other isp's in nz) throttle bandwidth on certain ports - just seems strange i can achieve full upload line speed now using a tunnel. Has anyone else had any such oddities?

 

Bonus photo: Top site via 443, bottom via CF tunnels - what a speed difference!

 

 

 

(And apologies if this is the wrong area - just thought it was relevant to my isp, Quic)

 

Thanks!

 

 

 

 

 

[Mod edit (MF): removed some material)


Create new topic

This is a filtered page: currently showing replies marked as answers. Click here to see full discussion.

cjkbarnett

37 posts

Geek
+1 received by user: 18


#3269992 9-Aug-2024 20:03
Send private message

Right, update time, for anyone else coming across this thread in the future (i hate unresolved threads!).

 

i have FIXED THE ISSUE for good this time 😃

 

@meow i'm sorry to disappoint, i didn't end up migrating to Proxmox (too big of a learning curve for one weekend lol), but thats still in the pipeline ; )

 

I fixed it by migrating to Caddy for the reverse proxy service. As simple as that, and wow, what a difference. It's now been two-ish months, and my emby server, running Windows 11 pro for workstations, has been absolutely rock solid in regards to upload / download performance. Easly peaks 25+ MB/s, and will often average around 10 MB/s per remote client depending on connection and i am more than happy with those numbers. 

 

Also, its stupid simple to set up, less than 10 lines of config in the caddy.file, and half that is just formatting.

 

Why this works so much better than IIS, Cloudflare Tunnels, NGNIX and the likes, i will never know. But it works, and it works well, and that's all i wanted. 

 

I have not tested this with windows server 2022 - i will wait for 2025 to release before going back to a server platform, and by then i may have moved to Proxmox entirely anyway.

 

I hope this helps someone in the future with similar issues, and thanks all for the input!


Create new topic








Geekzone Live »

Try automatic live updates from Geekzone directly in your browser, without refreshing the page, with Geekzone Live now.



Are you subscribed to our RSS feed? You can download the latest headlines and summaries from our stories directly to your computer or smartphone by using a feed reader.