Geekzone: technology news, blogs, forums
Guest
Welcome Guest.
You haven't logged in yet. If you don't have an account you can register now.


freitasm

BDFL - Memuneh
80646 posts

Uber Geek
+1 received by user: 41025

Administrator
ID Verified
Trusted
Geekzone
Lifetime subscriber

#250731 23-May-2019 11:01
Send private message

 

Retail telecommunications provider Spark New Zealand Limited (Spark) has been warned by the Commerce Commission for likely breaching the law when it notified customers of a broadband price rise. 

The warning follows an investigation into representations Spark made on its website and in emails in August and September 2018, notifying in-contract customers receiving its copper-based broadband service of its decision to increase the price by $5 a month.

Spark’s contractual terms and conditions stated that they would not change the monthly charge for in-contract customers without either gaining the customers’ consent or giving them the option to cancel their contract without early termination fees. However, when Spark notified customers of the price rise on its website and in email communications, Spark focussed solely on the $5 a month price increase and did not explain that if customers did not consent to the price rise they had the right to terminate their contract without penalty. 

Commissioner Anna Rawlings says in the Commission’s view, Spark has likely breached the Fair Trading Act by making false or misleading representations about the existence or effect of its customers’ rights when it notified them of the price rise.

“In the Commission’s view, customers reading Spark’s notification of the price rise would have assumed that Spark had a right to increase price without discussing it with the customer and that the customer had no choice but to accept the price increase. In fact, customers who did not agree to the price rise, could terminate the contract without incurring an early termination fee and could take up a more acceptable offer elsewhere if they wanted to.”

“When communicating with customers about price increases, businesses need to clearly and accurately represent any contractual rights customers may have if they do not accept the price increase. Businesses must not create the impression that prices can be unilaterally increased if that is not permitted by the contract, or if consumers are not bound to accept the increase,” says Ms Rawlings. 

Spark responded to the Commission’s enquiries by updating information on its website and sending updated information to customers affected by the price rise. 

Warning letters
A warning explains the Commerce Commission’s opinion that the conduct at issue is likely to have breached the law. Only the Courts can decide whether a breach of the law has in fact occurred.

 

The purpose of a warning letter is to inform the recipient of the Commission’s view that there has been a likely breach of the law, to suggest a change in the recipient’s behaviour, and to encourage future compliance with the law.

 





Referral links: Quic Broadband (free setup code: R587125ERQ6VE) | Samsung | AliExpress | Wise | Sharesies 

 

Support Geekzone by subscribing (browse ads-free), or making a one-off or recurring donation through PressPatron.

 


Create new topic
dejadeadnz
2394 posts

Uber Geek
+1 received by user: 2287
Inactive user


  #2244249 23-May-2019 21:35
Send private message

Another amateur hour performance. This kind of thing could easily have been prevented by a quick legal or compliance review of the communications before they were sent out. Telcos in NZ seem to be unique in that, as an industry, they appear to have zero concern for legal compliance and, even more startlingly, their own corporate reputations. I suppose if you are already in the gutter and rolling in ****, there's no lower that you can go.

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 




dfnt
1553 posts

Uber Geek
+1 received by user: 1036

Trusted
Lifetime subscriber

  #2244252 23-May-2019 21:39
Send private message

dejadeadnz:

 

there's no lower that you can go.

 

 

Yeah there is, they could go Vodafone low..


dejadeadnz
2394 posts

Uber Geek
+1 received by user: 2287
Inactive user


  #2244375 24-May-2019 08:07
Send private message

In my defence I did reference the industry :p

Within the industry then, yes, it does take a while to reach VF’s low.



MikeB4
MikeB4
18775 posts

Uber Geek
+1 received by user: 12765

ID Verified
Trusted
Subscriber

  #2244378 24-May-2019 08:26
Send private message

@dejadeadnz yet dealing with them commercially, especially Spark, one has to navigate through a sea of lawyers and legal flotsam. You would think by now they would get it right after all it is not an emerging industry.





Here is a crazy notion, lets give peace a chance.


1101
3141 posts

Uber Geek
+1 received by user: 1143


  #2244422 24-May-2019 09:59
Send private message

hmmn

 

a contract is a 2 way thing (my best bush lawyer terminology) .

 

If I sign a contract, its not the other parties responsibility to tell me my rights under the contact, that I read & agreed to.

 


Create new topic








Geekzone Live »

Try automatic live updates from Geekzone directly in your browser, without refreshing the page, with Geekzone Live now.



Are you subscribed to our RSS feed? You can download the latest headlines and summaries from our stories directly to your computer or smartphone by using a feed reader.