"Let’s look at that baggage – Vodafone’s coverage in the rural sector has always been less than optimal. The company says it covers 97% of where New Zealanders live work and play – but that’s people, not geography and in rural and remote areas you can leave the township and immediately lose coverage."
Now this is nothing new, and we all knew it. The discussion about "people" and "geography" is a long one. And it's not only on Vodafone, but Telecom as well. With all the economic implications.
As for Paul, he's doing it right. His job at Vodafone was to say what the company wanted out there. So when people complained about rural coverage and he defended the company line, he wasn't doing anything wrong really.



