Geekzone: technology news, blogs, forums
Guest
Welcome Guest.
You haven't logged in yet. If you don't have an account you can register now.




18 posts

Geek


Topic # 11146 5-Jan-2007 12:22
Send private message

Hi guys,

As per the subject header, I am planning to install SuSE 10.1 and XP on the same hard drive but on different partitions.

I have a 150GB SATA disk which has been partitioned with 20GB(NTFS) reserved for XP and 15GB(FAT32) for SuSE. The rest are reserved for storage purposes.

My question, is this kind of setup possible? Most, if not all of the guides I've come acrossed on Linux forums only have material on setting up Windows and Linux on 2 SEPARATE hard disks.

I hope someone can shed some light on this. Undecided

Create new topic
Juha
1318 posts

Uber Geek
+1 received by user: 5

Trusted
Subscriber

  Reply # 57006 5-Jan-2007 16:22
Send private message

Yes, it's possible but is there any particular reason you want to use FAT32 for SuSE instead of Ext3fs or XFS?




643 posts

Ultimate Geek


  Reply # 57009 5-Jan-2007 16:47

don't make a Linux partition in the XP installer, leave "unpartitioned space" there instead
install XP before Linux!
use the SuSE partitioner to create your Linux partitions in the free/unpartitioned space




Sniffing the glue holding the Internet together

 
 
 
 


Try Wrike: fast, easy, and efficient project collaboration software


18 posts

Geek


  Reply # 57013 5-Jan-2007 17:25
Send private message

Well, from what I've read in most  forums, they recommend installing SuSE on a FAT32 partition. I have installed SuSE only on one machine but not together with XP so this is quite new for me. This is one of the links I referred to.

http://susefaq.sourceforge.net/faq/inst_winxp1.html


Barf:
Ouch Yell, I have already made a Linux partition in the XP installer and there is no unpartitioned space now. Any way I can undo this? Formatting the disk and wiping windows isnt quite a big deal. I purposely didnt get much on the computer yet for the fear of something like this happening Embarassed

643 posts

Ultimate Geek


  Reply # 57014 5-Jan-2007 17:45

theres no need to wipe everything!
in the SuSE installer delete that FAT32 partition and put a Linux one there instead.
that document advises the FAT32 partition is only created to share files between Windows and Linux - you could however use the NTFS partition to do this. I would ignore this step but it's up to you.




Sniffing the glue holding the Internet together



18 posts

Geek


Reply # 57017 5-Jan-2007 17:57
Send private message

Gosh that what quick of you. I do take your word on the disk file system. Ill give that a go and see what happens

Another question, which may be a silly one, Im currently downloading disks 1 to 5 of the SuSE installation. Would it be ok if i burnt all of it onto one DVD instead of 5 CD-Rs and run the installation? Will the Linux installer be able to detect each disk on the DVD or will it still prompt to enter the 2nd, 3rd...disk and so on? (im quite a novice, i admit Embarassed

By the way I really appreciate you helping out. Most of the people I got assistance from here have been fantastic

643 posts

Ultimate Geek


  Reply # 57022 5-Jan-2007 18:47

sudevan: Would it be ok if i burnt all of it onto one DVD instead of 5 CD-Rs and run the installation?

that probably won't work - unless you can find a DVD image (~4GB .iso) to burn to dvd




Sniffing the glue holding the Internet together

11 posts

Geek


  Reply # 57083 6-Jan-2007 11:19
Send private message

I have had great results running a Suse 10.1 OSS version on my XP drive, and also I did not repartition the drives, but let the suse installer do it for me.

As has been mention, do install XP first, as it will happily overwrite the bootloader for Suse, making the Suse partitions inaccessible.

Use of a 'journaling' filesystem, such as ext, or xfs is definetly preferable to fatXX.  It is true that a fat partition would allow for easy file sharing between the two systems, However...

Did you know that the Suse linux kernel, is by default setup with the modules need to read from an NTFS, or FAT filesystem.  In other words, if you DON'T make another partition, you will still be able to read from your windows partition, via a very helpful network icon on the desktops of Suse.

I found this to be a perfect solution saving me space, as I sometimes wanted to get files from windows, but rarely do I want to get anything I produce on Suse (which is to say mostly program code) onto windows.



18 posts

Geek


  Reply # 57217 8-Jan-2007 11:32
Send private message

Methesda: I have had great results running a Suse 10.1 OSS version on my XP drive, and also I did not repartition the drives, but let the suse installer do it for me.

As has been mention, do install XP first, as it will happily overwrite the bootloader for Suse, making the Suse partitions inaccessible.

Use of a 'journaling' filesystem, such as ext, or xfs is definetly preferable to fatXX. It is true that a fat partition would allow for easy file sharing between the two systems, However...

Did you know that the Suse linux kernel, is by default setup with the modules need to read from an NTFS, or FAT filesystem. In other words, if you DON'T make another partition, you will still be able to read from your windows partition, via a very helpful network icon on the desktops of Suse.

I found this to be a perfect solution saving me space, as I sometimes wanted to get files from windows, but rarely do I want to get anything I produce on Suse (which is to say mostly program code) onto windows.




Thats some good info, im trying to do pretty much almost the exact same thing u did. This is my primary source of information, or a guide id say, which im using as my reference

http://www.tweakhound.com/linux/suse/101/installing_1.htm

Gonna work on the setup tonight. Hope it works out fine Cool



18 posts

Geek


Reply # 57900 14-Jan-2007 23:27
Send private message

I've got both Xp and Linux running beautifully. THanks a lot for the advice. I got the Linux partition formatted with reiser and am using KDE as my default desktop.

I've tried removing upgrading to firefox 2.0. A friend recommended I uninstall firefox from the package and download firefox 2.0 and install that. Which is just what i did.

And that led to another problem. After decompressing the tar.gz file, I could not bring myself to find any of those typical 'installation wizard' that you would typically find on windows machines. Plus i dont have firefox at all since it was removed.

Right now im running firefox 2.0 by executing it through Konsole. Anyone can tell me how do I get a nice Firefox icon on my desktop so that i dont have to type codes to launch it each time?



18 posts

Geek


  Reply # 57902 14-Jan-2007 23:48
Send private message

sudevan: I've got both Xp and Linux running beautifully. THanks a lot for the advice. I got the Linux partition formatted with reiser and am using KDE as my default desktop.

I've tried removing upgrading to firefox 2.0. A friend recommended I uninstall firefox from the package and download firefox 2.0 and install that. Which is just what i did.

And that led to another problem. After decompressing the tar.gz file, I could not bring myself to find any of those typical 'installation wizard' that you would typically find on windows machines. Plus i dont have firefox at all since it was removed.

Right now im running firefox 2.0 by executing it through Konsole. Anyone can tell me how do I get a nice Firefox icon on my desktop so that i dont have to type codes to launch it each time?




Oh and I forgot to add...i did create a Link to Application on my desktop to launch firefox without typing codes in Konsole. Although it doesnt look as nice as the original icon and takes a little more longer to launch the browser  I guess its better than nothing at all? Frown

Create new topic



Twitter »

Follow us to receive Twitter updates when new discussions are posted in our forums:



Follow us to receive Twitter updates when news items and blogs are posted in our frontpage:



Follow us to receive Twitter updates when tech item prices are listed in our price comparison site:





News »

UpStarters - the New Zealand tech and innovation story
Posted 21-May-2018 09:55


Lightbox updates platform with new streaming options
Posted 17-May-2018 13:09


Norton Core router launches with high-performance, IoT security in New Zealand
Posted 16-May-2018 02:00


D-Link ANZ launches new 4G LTE Dual SIM M2M VPN Router
Posted 15-May-2018 19:30


New Panasonic LUMIX FT7 ideal for outdoor: waterproof, dustproof
Posted 15-May-2018 19:17


Ryanair Goes All-In on AWS
Posted 15-May-2018 19:14


Te Papa and EQC Minecraft Mod shakes up earthquake education
Posted 15-May-2018 19:12


Framing Facebook: It’s not about technology
Posted 14-May-2018 16:02


Vocus works with NZ Police and telcos to stop scam calls
Posted 12-May-2018 11:12


Vista Group signs Aeon Entertainment, largest cinema chain in Japan
Posted 11-May-2018 21:41


New Privacy Trust Mark certifies privacy and customer control
Posted 10-May-2018 14:16


New app FIXR connects vehicle owners to top Mechanics at best prices
Posted 10-May-2018 14:13


Nutanix Beam gives enterprises control of the cloud
Posted 10-May-2018 14:09


D-Link ANZ launches Covr Seamless Wi-Fi System
Posted 10-May-2018 14:06


Telstra, Intel and Ericsson demonstrate a 5G future for esports
Posted 10-May-2018 13:59



Geekzone Live »

Try automatic live updates from Geekzone directly in your browser, without refreshing the page, with Geekzone Live now.



Are you subscribed to our RSS feed? You can download the latest headlines and summaries from our stories directly to your computer or smartphone by using a feed reader.

Alternatively, you can receive a daily email with Geekzone updates.