![]() ![]() ![]() |
|
nakedmolerat:shk292:nakedmolerat: quote from stuffThe Customs report, Border Implications from Emerging Technologies, says 3D printers have passed a "tipping point" and will radically change how borders are policed. The ultimate end of the technology could allow molecular-level printing of "gold, gems, food or drugs".
Huh, there is nothing wrong with that statement.
So, presumably you had the same science teacher as the article's author?
My teacher might be smarter than your teacher. This is what he taught me:
If I want to know about medical problem, I go to a doctor.
If I want to get legal advise, I go to a lawyer.
If I want to read about chemistry, I pick chemistry books.
This is a news site - for general audience. He is implying that in the future, we 'may' be able to print gold etc. If you are so pedantic about this, you should not read Stuff at all. Their articles will never have 100% scientific accuracy.
nakedmolerat: "You should not read Stuff at all. Their articles will never have 100% accuracy."
nakedmolerat:shk292:nakedmolerat: quote from stuffThe Customs report, Border Implications from Emerging Technologies, says 3D printers have passed a "tipping point" and will radically change how borders are policed. The ultimate end of the technology could allow molecular-level printing of "gold, gems, food or drugs".
Huh, there is nothing wrong with that statement.
So, presumably you had the same science teacher as the article's author?
My teacher might be smarter than your teacher. This is what he taught me:
If I want to know about medical problem, I go to a doctor.
If I want to get legal advise, I go to a lawyer.
If I want to read about chemistry, I pick chemistry books.
This is a news site - for general audience. He is implying that in the future, we 'may' be able to print gold etc. If you are so pedantic about this, you should not read Stuff at all. Their articles will never have 100% scientific accuracy.
Common sense is not as common as you think.
Auto-correct is why I have crust issues.
shk292: I think I give up. To me, the level of science knowledge needed to know that you can't "create" an element like gold from "molecules" of something else is what every fifth former should have. The fact that someone with less than this level is writing "technology" articles on a national website is just sad.
vexxxboy: Mouth wide open . it would be a moot point anyway if you could print gold it would become worthless and therefore why would you.
Edit to add: this is all hypothetical really. Molecular printing, if realized, would be far better applied in the medical and genetics industry. Imagine printing your own Leeloo. Who wouldn't?
reven: replicators they're finally here. "Tea, Earl grey, hot"
floydbloke: Not just a stuff article either. This is the front page headline in the DomPost today.
Um, sure, people, who can be bothered and have the time/resources/printer, could print gun parts. Could. (Which still require bullets and a firing pin, by the way).
You could also sharpen a toothbrush handle and use it as a shiv like they do in prison… Would be cheaper :-)
Demeter:vexxxboy: Mouth wide open . it would be a moot point anyway if you could print gold it would become worthless and therefore why would you.
Because you're a magpie? (Ooh, shiney!) For the sake of anarchy and the breakdown of modern capitalism? Some men just want to watch the world burn. I'd do it just so I can say YUS! WHO NEEDS A PHILOSOPHER'S STONE! Edit to add: this is all hypothetical really. Molecular printing, if realized, would be far better applied in the medical and genetics industry. Imagine printing your own Leeloo. Who wouldn't?
Asmodeus: Introducing the new Alchemist 1000 Element Printer! (Particle collider attachment sold separately. Lead ingots not included)
|
![]() ![]() ![]() |