Handle9:
Technofreak:
If this was so important should he have ever been appointed to the role?
This is a fairly silly point.
It's analogous to a CEO resigning after being found out to be guilty of historical sexual harassment. Just because something happened in the past doesn't mean that it doesn't have present day consequences.
I beg to differ. Your analogy is flawed. These tweets were public knowledge 9 years ago which is very unlike something historical that hasn't been public knowledge.