|
|
|
DarthKermit: The Turks say they warned the Russian plane ten times, the Russians say that no warning was received. Which version of events is the correct one?
We don't know jack at this point.
_____________________________________________________________________
I've been on Geekzone over 16 years..... Time flies....
joker97: A violation is a violation. If you get anywhere near the US border you will be toast, nevermind enter it.
_____________________________________________________________________
I've been on Geekzone over 16 years..... Time flies....
Linuxluver:joker97: A violation is a violation. If you get anywhere near the US border you will be toast, nevermind enter it.
Like on 9/11.
The other countries in the area will have radar signals. They will know who was where. NATO won't be going to war with Russia over BS like this.
joker97:Linuxluver:joker97: A violation is a violation. If you get anywhere near the US border you will be toast, nevermind enter it.
Like on 9/11.
The other countries in the area will have radar signals. They will know who was where. NATO won't be going to war with Russia over BS like this.
There are two points to be made.
1. A violation of airspace is serious and any action is justified.
2. Was there
-a violation in airspace. At the moment we don't know.
-Was there any warnings of getting too close to violating Turkish airspace. We don't know, but i suspect yes. And o suspect this is not the first time. And I suspect the Kremlin doesn't care, as it flies its fighter planes as close to any borders it likes. Recent, Swedish, usa, British.
- I suspect the Turks are protecting Syrian rebels of Turkish descent is the vibe I'm getting.
Here is a crazy notion, lets give peace a chance.
joker97: yes and it has happened.
17s is irrelevant.
at 1000km/h you can bomb just about anything you want in the 10 minutes it takes to scramble your F16s interceptors
Here is a crazy notion, lets give peace a chance.
joker97: Here are some more recent ones
http://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-3081829/RAF-scrambles-jets-two-Russian-military-aircraft-seen-flying-British-airspace.html
http://cbs12.com/news/features/aroundtheweb/videos/six-russian-planes-intercepted-by-us-jets-that-neared-us-airspace.shtml
http://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-3091516/Sweden-scrambles-fighter-jets-intercept-two-Russian-bombers-entering-airspace-provocative-Scandinavian-nation-call-obvious-signal-outside-world.html
This time though, it appears the Turks were protecting their descendants ... but that's 100% speculation of course.
Here is a crazy notion, lets give peace a chance.
MikeB4:joker97: yes and it has happened.
17s is irrelevant.
at 1000km/h you can bomb just about anything you want in the 10 minutes it takes to scramble your F16s interceptors
you said any action is justified, being able to be done is a far cry from justifiable.
joker97:MikeB4:joker97: yes and it has happened.
17s is irrelevant.
at 1000km/h you can bomb just about anything you want in the 10 minutes it takes to scramble your F16s interceptors
you said any action is justified, being able to be done is a far cry from justifiable.
Yes it is justified. Sorry I need to put a disclaimer.
*I am not an international lawyer or ethicist, I just have the belief that airspace violation is never tolerated by any sovereign state.
PPS - what i don't understand is Syria allows jsut about anyone into its airspace for fun. But Turkey, no. Was there a violation? We don't know. Were the RUssians close? Certainly very close to Turkish airspace. That in itself does not justify shooting them down. But the US WILL under that circumstance.
Here is a crazy notion, lets give peace a chance.
joker97:
PPS - what i don't understand is Syria allows jsut about anyone into its airspace for fun.
Here is a crazy notion, lets give peace a chance.
|
|
|