No monorail

Forums › Off topic › No monorail

JaseNZ

2576 posts

Uber Geek

ID Verified

Lifetime subscriber

#146811 29-May-2014 18:43

I see that the Fiordland monorail project has been rejected. I actually thought it was a pretty feasible idea.

Ding Ding Ding Ding Ding : Ice cream man , Ice cream man

1 | 2

19282 posts

Uber Geek
Inactive user

#1056151 29-May-2014 18:44

It was a awesome idea

Mighty Ape

Shop Mighty Ape for electronics, games, computers books and more (affiliate link).

MikeB4

18133 posts

Uber Geek

ID Verified

Trusted

Subscriber

#1056152 29-May-2014 18:46

I support the decision made

RunningMan

7966 posts

Uber Geek

#1056153 29-May-2014 18:47

I keep thinking of The Simpsons monorail episode every time I hear about it

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Marge_vs._the_Monorail

mattwnz

19388 posts

Uber Geek

#1056167 29-May-2014 18:52

Monorails are very expensive things to install, so it could have become a very expensive white elephant and the tax payer may have had to pay for it's removal if it failed. I think it was a very bad idea in the area that it was planned for, as it would have set a very bad precedent for our national parks. They don't have a place in those parts of NZ. They are a disneyland attraction after all, and we don't won't to themepark our national parks. But I think it could be an idea for Auckland or wellington CBDs. But they need to be well thought out, and actually go somewhere, and some cities don't have a good track record for settings these things up well. Look at auckland trams which don't go anywhere, or sydneys monorail, which is being removed.

coffeebaron

6074 posts

Uber Geek

Trusted

Lifetime subscriber

#1056169 29-May-2014 18:58

johnr: It was a awesome idea

With full 4G coverage all the way of course :)

Rural IT and Broadband support.

Broadband troubleshooting and master filter installs.
Starlink installer
Wi-Fi and networking
Cel-Fi supply and installer - boost your mobile phone coverage legally
Rural Broadband RBI installer for Ultimate Broadband and Full Flavour

Need help in Auckland, Waikato or BoP? Click my email button, or email me direct: [my user name] at geekzonemail dot com

johnr

19282 posts

Uber Geek
Inactive user

#1056171 29-May-2014 19:10

coffeebaron:
johnr: It was a awesome idea

With full 4G coverage all the way of course :)

Coil

6614 posts

Uber Geek
Inactive user

#1056192 29-May-2014 20:00

johnr:
coffeebaron:
johnr: It was a awesome idea

With full 4G coverage all the way of course :)

5G

Knowing this county im going to throw 7G out there by the time a project like this is even done.

oxnsox

1923 posts

Uber Geek

#1056225 29-May-2014 20:46

Agree its the right decision. Part of the appeal of going to Milford Sound is that it doesn't have easy access. And last time I went (~1year) I found it way too overcrowded.
Restrict numbers so visitors really appreciate they're lucky to be able to go there..... and you'll be able to charge a premium so not loose income and provide a better experience for all visitors.

But I think todays decision has a lot of politics attached to it despite the apparently rational justification.

Geektastic

17690 posts

Uber Geek

Trusted

Lifetime subscriber

#1056270 29-May-2014 22:30

Presso: I see that the Fiordland monorail project has been rejected. I actually thought it was a pretty feasible idea.

It was awesome, but we don't like new-fangled modern ideas in these parts...!

Geektastic

17690 posts

Uber Geek

Trusted

Lifetime subscriber

#1056288 29-May-2014 22:36

oxnsox: Agree its the right decision. Part of the appeal of going to Milford Sound is that it doesn't have easy access. And last time I went (~1year) I found it way too overcrowded.
Restrict numbers so visitors really appreciate they're lucky to be able to go there..... and you'll be able to charge a premium so not loose income and provide a better experience for all visitors.

But I think todays decision has a lot of politics attached to it despite the apparently rational justification.

It's Milford Sound, not the moon!!

There are any number of not dissimilar places in Scandinavia and so on.

Yes it is very nice (although I think Doubtful is better) but really I don't think you can claim anyone is especially 'lucky' to go there.

When there are things like tunnels under Mont Blanc with no appreciable effect on the Alps and so on, I think we lose opportunities when decisions like this are made: the number of people visiting won't diminish but sooner or later a couple of coaches will collide and kill about 100 people and then it will all be 'should have built the monorail or the tunnel'...!

mattwnz

19388 posts

Uber Geek

#1056322 29-May-2014 23:38

Geektastic:
Presso: I see that the Fiordland monorail project has been rejected. I actually thought it was a pretty feasible idea.

It was awesome, but we don't like new-fangled modern ideas in these parts...!

You do realise that monorails are pretty old technology, so they are not exactly modern. I have lived in a cities with monorails, one tradtiona, and one suspended, and they really aren't all that great, they are pretty slow and the tracking is pretty ugly.

I think it was more difficult for them to get it approved in an election year, as anything to do with the environment it is potentially an election issue.
But the main problem sounds like it was due to what would happen if the business failed, and then you would be left with a white elephant that tax payers would need to bail out and pay for removal. If they had a contingency fund for funding removal, that was held in trust, then I suspect they may have looked at it differently. NZ does have to protect it's land, as much of NZs value overseas, with both products and tourism is our clean green image.

Batman

Mad Scientist
29045 posts

Uber Geek

Trusted

Lifetime subscriber

#1056335 30-May-2014 07:06

well Dunedin with its dying economy also rejected a 5 star hotel. I guess the fewer people trespassing the country the cleaner it stays

networkn

Networkn
30223 posts

Uber Geek

ID Verified

Trusted

Lifetime subscriber

#1056367 30-May-2014 09:37

I couldn't understand this whole project, surely we need better transport options in our cities than worrying about 200M spent on a tourist attraction. If they spent that $200M on a rail option to the airport, that would make so much more sense to me.

lchiu7

6183 posts

Uber Geek

Trusted

#1056390 30-May-2014 10:19

I didn't follow the entire history of the proposal but I didn't think the Govt was asked to provide any finance. But it was rejected based on the business case not stacking up.

Now a Mag Lev train - that would have been more 21st Century!

Staying in Wellington. Check out my AirBnB in the Wellington CBD. https://www.airbnb.co.nz/rooms/32019730 Mention GZ to get a 10% discount

System One: PS3 SuperSlim, NPVR and Plex Server running on Intel NUC (C2D) (Windows 10 Pro), Sony BDP-S390 BD player, Pioneer AVR, Odroid C2 running Kodi and Plex, Panasonic 60" 3D plasma, Samsung Q80 Atmos soundbar. Google Chromecast, Google Chromecast TV

System Two: Oppo BDP-80 BluRay Player with hardware mode to be region free, Vivitek HD1080P 1080P DLP projector with 100" screen, Denon AVRS730H 7.2 Channel Dolby Atmos/DTS-X AV Receiver, Samsung 4K player, Google Chromecast, Odroid C2 running Kodi and Plex

Geektastic

17690 posts

Uber Geek

Trusted

Lifetime subscriber

#1056589 30-May-2014 15:18

mattwnz:
Geektastic:
Presso: I see that the Fiordland monorail project has been rejected. I actually thought it was a pretty feasible idea.

It was awesome, but we don't like new-fangled modern ideas in these parts...!

You do realise that monorails are pretty old technology, so they are not exactly modern. I have lived in a cities with monorails, one tradtiona, and one suspended, and they really aren't all that great, they are pretty slow and the tracking is pretty ugly.
I think it was more difficult for them to get it approved in an election year, as anything to do with the environment it is potentially an election issue.
But the main problem sounds like it was due to what would happen if the business failed, and then you would be left with a white elephant that tax payers would need to bail out and pay for removal. If they had a contingency fund for funding removal, that was held in trust, then I suspect they may have looked at it differently. NZ does have to protect it's land, as much of NZs value overseas, with both products and tourism is our clean green image.

Yes. But then 125mph intercity trains are also 'pretty old technology' and we have none of them either.

1 | 2