Geekzone: technology news, blogs, forums
Guest
Welcome Guest.
You haven't logged in yet. If you don't have an account you can register now.




116 posts

Master Geek


#151976 11-Sep-2014 20:21
Send private message

ok, So i read the story,  and read roughly 50 of the comments
and the majority on stuff (terrible i know) are asking the question - How does someone end up staying in state housing for 29 years?

Income tested rent, paying $272 per week, could she not find somewhere else in that time to live at the same cost within that 29yrs?
I understand housing shortage i'm living in Christchurch in a terrible rental which i consider overpriced

Personally i've tried to get a housing NZ house when I was struggling to find employment/accomodation so I had my own place to look after my daughter in the weekends, to be told nope nothing available, and then see an article like this when I know there are people with less living in worse


what are other peoples thoughts here?


http://www.stuff.co.nz/national/10483959/Rent-letter-mistake-shocks-tenants  - Article
 tl;dr version - MSD accidentally sent a letter stating stupid charging coming for state house rental, woman that went to media in the same house for 29years on income tested rent.

View this topic in a long page with up to 500 replies per page Create new topic
 1 | 2
2572 posts

Uber Geek


  #1126777 11-Sep-2014 20:55
Send private message

Should be capped at 5 years, imo.



116 posts

Master Geek


  #1126781 11-Sep-2014 21:01
Send private message

Thats what i was thinking, 5 years is more than enough time to better your situation, or move to a house and get a housemate to help subsidise the rent


 
 
 
 


2572 posts

Uber Geek


  #1126793 11-Sep-2014 21:17
Send private message

Yup, and means houses more readily available for those who need it, rather than those who've just become accustomed to it.

4431 posts

Uber Geek
Inactive user


  #1126797 11-Sep-2014 21:27
Send private message

Surely, at the age of 59, their kids have left home... and rent in that part of the world would probably only be $280 a week anyway.
5 years unless they're disabled... in which case, if they're paying $272, they can afford $280.

gzt

11541 posts

Uber Geek

Lifetime subscriber

  #1126800 11-Sep-2014 21:37
Send private message

I don't see anything wrong with it. They are paying a market rent. Ideally they would have an opportunity to buy also.

2681 posts

Uber Geek


  #1126822 11-Sep-2014 22:04
Send private message

I suspect that at 59 buying wouldn't be feasible - they would never repay the mortgage.

As to how long someone should be entitled to stay in a state house, it kind of depends on their individual circumstances. In general it should be for a shortish period, and once someone is in a position where it is reasonable to expect them to pay market rent (income, circumstances, options etc) then they should be expected/encouraged to move out and free up the unit for someone in need. For some people this might mean it's reasonable for them to stay in a state house for months or years. For others, such the severely disabled who can't work, it might mean decades or forever.

Similarly, people should be expected to move when their circumstances and needs change dramatically. For example, a couple who got a large state house when they had seven kids might still not be able to house themselves at market rates when all the kids have left home, and may need to stay in a state house. However, it's reasonable to expect them to move to a smaller 1 or 2 bedroom place now that they no longer realistically need the huge house - esp if there are large families in desperate need of a suitable house.

So horses for courses. But only for as long as your circumstances dictate that you can't reasonably be expected to house yourself at market rates (with help from the Accommodation Supplement as appropriate).

gzt

11541 posts

Uber Geek

Lifetime subscriber

  #1126844 11-Sep-2014 22:26
Send private message

The government has similar views. There is now a system of regular reviews in place.

 
 
 
 




116 posts

Master Geek


  #1126979 12-Sep-2014 08:40
Send private message

gzt: The government has similar views. There is now a system of regular reviews in place.


Yea I was looking at the housing NZ website, and they say they are putting it in place, but will it stop those manipulating it?

the thing about the article tho, is that she could probably get a better place as while in state housing you dont get the accomodation supplement, and given she has state housing would probably qualify for a decent chunk.

809 posts

Ultimate Geek
Inactive user


  #1127023 12-Sep-2014 09:37
Send private message

29 years does seem a long time.
I knew a solo mum, she had one, she used to work for PO back when it was a SOA...as a telephone operator.....she bought hers after a few years.
Still lives in it.



And you have this sort of thing:
https://www.givealittle.co.nz/cause/Spouting

Don't qualify for a WINZ loan.

14693 posts

Uber Geek

Trusted
Lifetime subscriber

  #1127041 12-Sep-2014 09:53
Send private message

Housing NZ is a basket case - my wife worked in head office for a while as a contractor and it was so dysfunctional it amazed me that they managed to do anything at all. The usual sort of things - incompetent 'managers' whose only qualifications for being a manager was that they had been there 20 years and it was Buggins' Turn.

IMO such housing should ALWAYS be a temporary stop gap measure. The aim should always be to get people out of them and into private sector rented accommodation as soon as feasible.







15330 posts

Uber Geek

Trusted
Subscriber

  #1127051 12-Sep-2014 10:10
Send private message

Government provided homes should available to those who meet the criteria for as long as they continue to meet the criteria




Mike

 

Consultant

 


The views stated in my posts are my personal views and not that of any other organisation.

 

He waka eke noa


14693 posts

Uber Geek

Trusted
Lifetime subscriber

  #1127060 12-Sep-2014 10:27
Send private message

KiwiNZ: Government provided homes should available to those who meet the criteria for as long as they continue to meet the criteria


And presumably that applies even if say 3 million of us were to meet the criteria?!





15330 posts

Uber Geek

Trusted
Subscriber

  #1127065 12-Sep-2014 10:38
Send private message

Geektastic:
KiwiNZ: Government provided homes should available to those who meet the criteria for as long as they continue to meet the criteria


And presumably that applies even if say 3 million of us were to meet the criteria?!


thats absurd. 




Mike

 

Consultant

 


The views stated in my posts are my personal views and not that of any other organisation.

 

He waka eke noa


14693 posts

Uber Geek

Trusted
Lifetime subscriber

  #1127070 12-Sep-2014 10:43
Send private message

KiwiNZ:
Geektastic:
KiwiNZ: Government provided homes should available to those who meet the criteria for as long as they continue to meet the criteria


And presumably that applies even if say 3 million of us were to meet the criteria?!


thats absurd. 


It's an exaggeration.

You cannot have a policy that entitles any number of people to something as a matter of right unless you can think how to pay for it.

It is unlikely that 3 million would ever need it but there are not enough houses to go around even now - so in order to allow what you suggest we will all have to pay for the building of plenty more of them. I do not get up and go to work so I can pay to house other people. I tolerate a small amount of it grudgingly but I think that the private sector can supply perfectly adequate amounts of housing to put a roof over the heads of these people without tax payer dollars needing to build more of them.







116 posts

Master Geek


  #1127074 12-Sep-2014 10:45
Send private message

well given that the person in the article can afford $272 and that is what just over 50% of the persons income based on a 30hr week at min wage? I know people in private rentals spending more than that. that don't qualify somehow.

so the criteria.... hmm new question I geuss

 1 | 2
View this topic in a long page with up to 500 replies per page Create new topic




News »

Freeview On Demand app launches on Sony Android TVs
Posted 6-Aug-2020 13:35


UFB hits more than one million connections
Posted 6-Aug-2020 09:42


D-Link A/NZ extends COVR Wi-Fi EasyMesh System series with new three-pack
Posted 4-Aug-2020 15:01


New Zealand software Rfider tracks coffee from Colombia all the way to New Zealand businesses
Posted 3-Aug-2020 10:35


Logitech G launches Pro X Wireless gaming headset
Posted 3-Aug-2020 10:21


Sony Alpha 7S III provides supreme imaging performance
Posted 3-Aug-2020 10:11


Sony introduces first CFexpress Type A memory card
Posted 3-Aug-2020 10:05


Marsello acquires Goody consolidating online and in-store marketing position
Posted 30-Jul-2020 16:26


Fonterra first major customer for Microsoft's New Zealand datacentre
Posted 30-Jul-2020 08:07


Everything we learnt at the IBM Cloud Forum 2020
Posted 29-Jul-2020 14:45


Dropbox launches native HelloSign workflow and data residency in Australia
Posted 29-Jul-2020 12:48


Spark launches 5G in Palmerston North
Posted 29-Jul-2020 09:50


Lenovo brings speed and smarter features to new 5G mobile gaming phone
Posted 28-Jul-2020 22:00


Withings raises $60 million to enable bridge between patients and healthcare
Posted 28-Jul-2020 21:51


QNAP integrates Catalyst Cloud Object Storage into Hybrid Backup solution
Posted 28-Jul-2020 21:40



Geekzone Live »

Try automatic live updates from Geekzone directly in your browser, without refreshing the page, with Geekzone Live now.


Support Geekzone »

Our community of supporters help make Geekzone possible. Click the button below to join them.

Support Geezone on PressPatron



Are you subscribed to our RSS feed? You can download the latest headlines and summaries from our stories directly to your computer or smartphone by using a feed reader.

Alternatively, you can receive a daily email with Geekzone updates.