Geekzone: technology news, blogs, forums
Guest
Welcome Guest.
You haven't logged in yet. If you don't have an account you can register now.


6407 posts

Uber Geek
+1 received by user: 3229


Topic # 217764 11-Jul-2017 16:34
Send private message

https://www.consumer.org.nz/articles/fake-review-leads-to-pr-firm

 

Rather generous of Sue Chetwin to not name the person who accidentally doxxed themselves, and also not name the "PR" company.

 

I expect "slant or bias" from spin merchants - but outright lies by paid shills - that's another story.

 

Especially if their client (presumably another power company) was aware of the tactic.

 

I'd like to see the Commerce Commission follow this up - surely that's the kind of disgraceful corporate behaviour they should be protecting us from.


View this topic in a long page with up to 500 replies per page Create new topic
 1 | 2 | 3
241 posts

Master Geek
+1 received by user: 38


  Reply # 1819725 11-Jul-2017 17:43
Send private message

thats why i don't read most reviews 90% are fake 


387 posts

Ultimate Geek
+1 received by user: 183


  Reply # 1819818 11-Jul-2017 19:48
Send private message

Bahahaha, what a total fool. Who logs in using their personal details to lay a fake complaint!?

 

I love how they screw up so badly, even their boss had to grovel to apologies.

 

To honest, it makes me want to check out Flick! They must be amazing if they're going so far to discredit! lol


1103 posts

Uber Geek
+1 received by user: 432


  Reply # 1819820 11-Jul-2017 19:51
Send private message

biggal:

 

thats why i don't read most reviews 90% are fake 

 

 

This should not be the case with consumer.org.nz, its suppose to be a good site, with genuine reviews you can trust. I once was a subscriber, and use to pay good money for such reviews.


235 posts

Master Geek
+1 received by user: 104

Trusted

  Reply # 1819821 11-Jul-2017 19:53
One person supports this post
Send private message

Wiggum:

biggal:


thats why i don't read most reviews 90% are fake 



This should not be the case with consumer.org.nz, its suppose to be a good site, with genuine reviews you can trust. I w=once was a subscriber, and use to pay good money for such reviews.



I think you'll find there is a difference between the reviews done by Consumer themselves (or the independent labs they contract to) and the "comments" that are made by the general public on the Consumer website. The former will influence my purchasing heavily, the latter I don't bother reading. The "review" in question appears to be one of the latter.

BDFL - Memuneh
60603 posts

Uber Geek
+1 received by user: 11535

Administrator
Trusted
Geekzone
Lifetime subscriber

  Reply # 1819893 11-Jul-2017 21:01
Send private message
3064 posts

Uber Geek
+1 received by user: 909

Trusted
Subscriber

  Reply # 1819961 11-Jul-2017 22:31
4 people support this post
Send private message

"Maybe it was a mistake. But maybe it was a mistake because they got caught. I’ll let you judge." - this made me laugh. It was a mistake because the commentor put her real name on it. I'd imagine the scenario then went "That's ok, I'll delete it and re-post with some fake credentials. F***!! I can't delete it!" Following that she rang Consumer and it (gradually) became mea culpa from there.


435 posts

Ultimate Geek
+1 received by user: 92


  Reply # 1820023 12-Jul-2017 08:31
One person supports this post
Send private message

Would be great to be able to read the offending "review" and try to guess the company in question laughing

 

Astroturfing...never heard of that one before. My new word of the day. Thanks @freitasm hahaha


600 posts

Ultimate Geek
+1 received by user: 208


  Reply # 1820036 12-Jul-2017 08:52
Send private message

It was probably a naive and over enthusiastic new graduate wanting to show her dedication to the cause.





Amanon

1103 posts

Uber Geek
+1 received by user: 432


  Reply # 1820037 12-Jul-2017 08:55
2 people support this post
Send private message

Consumer New Zealand, "Choose what's right for you with confidence"

 

I wonder how many people read the Flick article, saw the fake comments, and decided to go with another power supplier based on those comments. Its a real shame that consumer NZ does not have the balls to publish the offending company. 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 


600 posts

Ultimate Geek
+1 received by user: 208


  Reply # 1820038 12-Jul-2017 08:56
Send private message

Wiggum:

 

Consumer New Zealand, "Choose what's right for you with confidence"

 

I wonder how many people read the Flick article, saw the fake comments, and decided to go with another power supplier based on those comments. Its a real shame that consumer NZ does not have the balls to publish the offending company. 

 

 

 

Yeh - lets ruin her life.





Amanon

BDFL - Memuneh
60603 posts

Uber Geek
+1 received by user: 11535

Administrator
Trusted
Geekzone
Lifetime subscriber

1103 posts

Uber Geek
+1 received by user: 432


  Reply # 1820042 12-Jul-2017 09:10
3 people support this post
Send private message

Dulouz:

 

Wiggum:

 

Consumer New Zealand, "Choose what's right for you with confidence"

 

I wonder how many people read the Flick article, saw the fake comments, and decided to go with another power supplier based on those comments. Its a real shame that consumer NZ does not have the balls to publish the offending company. 

 

 

 

Yeh - lets ruin her life.

 

 

The offending company should be published. I think consumers have a right to know.

 

Nobody is asking to publish the persons name involved. Offending company should be the ones who decide to take further action against this individual, they can decide to publish her name or not, or simply fire her. But by the sounds of it, offending company does not even know this has happened.

 

CEO of consumer NZ, Sue Chetwin said the following:

 

. But what concerned me was the questioning of Consumer NZ’s integrity. One of the beauties of belonging to us is that people trust our advice. We’ve built a business on it. I rang the PR woman who posted it. I wanted to know whether this was company practice (we’re not talking a small PR firm here).

 

Now I am questioning Consumer NZ's integrity, they seem to be protecting this person, and what steps are they taking to stop this from happening again in the future. I normally trust the reviews on consumer NZ, that trust has now gone out of the window and I will just rank them the same as all other rubbish review sites out there. I sure as hell wont be subscribing to them in future, or reading their magazines.

 

 


4360 posts

Uber Geek
+1 received by user: 1732


  Reply # 1821073 12-Jul-2017 10:11
Send private message

I remember 10 years ago talking to someone setting up a small website for their creative-based business, selling direct to consumers.

 

They told me that you couldn't just set up a website and wait for customers.  You also had to pay a review writing service to generate a whole lot of favourable reviews.  The reviews were about service standard rather than product quality.

 

 





Mike

4360 posts

Uber Geek
+1 received by user: 1732


  Reply # 1821076 12-Jul-2017 10:13
Send private message

Dulouz:

 

It was probably a naive and over enthusiastic new graduate wanting to show her dedication to the cause.

 

 

Lucky for her she was able to turn on the water works enough for Sue Chetwin to feel sorry for her ...





Mike

BDFL - Memuneh
60603 posts

Uber Geek
+1 received by user: 11535

Administrator
Trusted
Geekzone
Lifetime subscriber

  Reply # 1821078 12-Jul-2017 10:18
One person supports this post
Send private message

MikeAqua:

 

I remember 10 years ago talking to someone setting up a small website for their creative-based business, selling direct to consumers.

 

They told me that you couldn't just set up a website and wait for customers.  You also had to pay a review writing service to generate a whole lot of favourable reviews.  The reviews were about service standard rather than product quality.

 

 

Yes and no. He was probably talking about those SEO spammers that go around posting how great something/service is in blog comments, forum posts, paid blog posts,etc, with link drops. This got so bad Google started penalising websites by reducing their presence in search results, based on the quality of inbound links.

 

At some point SEO experts started selling services to help companies remove these companies. They would then approach bloggers, forum owners asking to have these removed - and paying to remove it (ironic in the case of paid blog posts).

 

I have a couple of blog posts (original, not paid) where I mention one company or another and I posted a link. A SEO "expert" contacted me asking to remove those links. Since it was my blog post, not a paid service, original content, not spam, I didn't even consider. They created the mess, not my problem.

 

I've seen New Zealand companies fall for this. A job site with the perfect domain name hired a Christchurch SEO company to help them. This company in turn hired some Indian-based spammers to go around posting in blog comments and forums. When someone with the job company's owners name posted on Geekzone I thought it was strange - I know the guy and he wouldn't post with such bad English. That's when he found out his "SEO experts" were actually charging $5000/month to then dump a couple of hundred dollars on a spam service and pocket the rest without doing anything.

 

Another New Zealand SEO company, a "fast growth startup" charges a few thousand dollars a month to generate a "report" that is actually the same document for everyone, with just a find and replace of the client's name. Some suggestions are laughable and clearly shows they didn't even bother visiting their client's website for the assessment service.





 1 | 2 | 3
View this topic in a long page with up to 500 replies per page Create new topic

Twitter »

Follow us to receive Twitter updates when new discussions are posted in our forums:



Follow us to receive Twitter updates when news items and blogs are posted in our frontpage:



Follow us to receive Twitter updates when tech item prices are listed in our price comparison site:





News »

N4L helping TAKA Trust bridge the digital divide for Lower Hutt students
Posted 18-Jun-2018 13:08


Winners Announced for 2018 CIO Awards
Posted 18-Jun-2018 13:03


Logitech Rally sets new standard for USB-connected video conference cameras
Posted 18-Jun-2018 09:27


Russell Stanners steps down as Vodafone NZ CEO
Posted 12-Jun-2018 09:13


Intergen recognised as 2018 Microsoft Country Partner of the Year for New Zealand
Posted 12-Jun-2018 08:00


Finalists Announced For Microsoft NZ Partner Awards
Posted 6-Jun-2018 15:12


Vocus Group and Vodafone announce joint venture to accelerate fibre innovation
Posted 5-Jun-2018 10:52


Kogan.com to launch Kogan Mobile in New Zealand
Posted 4-Jun-2018 14:34


Enable doubles fibre broadband speeds for its most popular wholesale service in Christchurch
Posted 2-Jun-2018 20:07


All or Nothing: New Zealand All Blacks arrives on Amazon Prime Video
Posted 2-Jun-2018 16:21


Innovation Grant, High Tech Awards and new USA office for Kiwi tech company SwipedOn
Posted 1-Jun-2018 20:54


Commerce Commission warns Apple for misleading consumers about their rights
Posted 30-May-2018 13:15


IBM leads Call for Code to use cloud, data, AI, blockchain for natural disaster relief
Posted 25-May-2018 14:12


New FUJIFILM X-T100 aims to do better job than smartphones
Posted 24-May-2018 20:17


Stuff takes 100% ownership of Stuff Fibre
Posted 24-May-2018 19:41



Geekzone Live »

Try automatic live updates from Geekzone directly in your browser, without refreshing the page, with Geekzone Live now.



Are you subscribed to our RSS feed? You can download the latest headlines and summaries from our stories directly to your computer or smartphone by using a feed reader.

Alternatively, you can receive a daily email with Geekzone updates.