Geekzone: technology news, blogs, forums
Guest
Welcome Guest.
You haven't logged in yet. If you don't have an account you can register now.




10576 posts

Uber Geek


#217764 11-Jul-2017 16:34
Send private message

https://www.consumer.org.nz/articles/fake-review-leads-to-pr-firm

 

Rather generous of Sue Chetwin to not name the person who accidentally doxxed themselves, and also not name the "PR" company.

 

I expect "slant or bias" from spin merchants - but outright lies by paid shills - that's another story.

 

Especially if their client (presumably another power company) was aware of the tactic.

 

I'd like to see the Commerce Commission follow this up - surely that's the kind of disgraceful corporate behaviour they should be protecting us from.


View this topic in a long page with up to 500 replies per page Create new topic
 1 | 2 | 3
449 posts

Ultimate Geek


  #1819725 11-Jul-2017 17:43
Send private message

thats why i don't read most reviews 90% are fake 


735 posts

Ultimate Geek

Subscriber

  #1819818 11-Jul-2017 19:48
Send private message

Bahahaha, what a total fool. Who logs in using their personal details to lay a fake complaint!?

 

I love how they screw up so badly, even their boss had to grovel to apologies.

 

To honest, it makes me want to check out Flick! They must be amazing if they're going so far to discredit! lol


 
 
 
 


1199 posts

Uber Geek
Inactive user


  #1819820 11-Jul-2017 19:51
Send private message

biggal:

 

thats why i don't read most reviews 90% are fake 

 

 

This should not be the case with consumer.org.nz, its suppose to be a good site, with genuine reviews you can trust. I once was a subscriber, and use to pay good money for such reviews.


746 posts

Ultimate Geek

Trusted

  #1819821 11-Jul-2017 19:53
Send private message

Wiggum:

biggal:


thats why i don't read most reviews 90% are fake 



This should not be the case with consumer.org.nz, its suppose to be a good site, with genuine reviews you can trust. I w=once was a subscriber, and use to pay good money for such reviews.



I think you'll find there is a difference between the reviews done by Consumer themselves (or the independent labs they contract to) and the "comments" that are made by the general public on the Consumer website. The former will influence my purchasing heavily, the latter I don't bother reading. The "review" in question appears to be one of the latter.

BDFL - Memuneh
67870 posts

Uber Geek

Administrator
Trusted
Geekzone
Lifetime subscriber

  #1819893 11-Jul-2017 21:01
Send private message

And that's is why we take astroturfing seriously - it's a breach of FUG and many accounts were banned for this kind of behaviour.





 

 

These links are referral codes

 

Geekzone broadband switch | Eletricity comparison and switch | Hatch investment (NZ$ 10 bonus if NZ$100 deposited within 30 days) | Sharesies | Mighty Ape | Backblaze | Amazon | My technology disclosure 


3581 posts

Uber Geek

Trusted
Lifetime subscriber

  #1819961 11-Jul-2017 22:31
Send private message

"Maybe it was a mistake. But maybe it was a mistake because they got caught. I’ll let you judge." - this made me laugh. It was a mistake because the commentor put her real name on it. I'd imagine the scenario then went "That's ok, I'll delete it and re-post with some fake credentials. F***!! I can't delete it!" Following that she rang Consumer and it (gradually) became mea culpa from there.


696 posts

Ultimate Geek

Trusted

  #1820023 12-Jul-2017 08:31
Send private message

Would be great to be able to read the offending "review" and try to guess the company in question laughing

 

Astroturfing...never heard of that one before. My new word of the day. Thanks @freitasm hahaha






 
 
 
 


693 posts

Ultimate Geek


  #1820036 12-Jul-2017 08:52
Send private message

It was probably a naive and over enthusiastic new graduate wanting to show her dedication to the cause.





Amanon

1199 posts

Uber Geek
Inactive user


  #1820037 12-Jul-2017 08:55
Send private message

Consumer New Zealand, "Choose what's right for you with confidence"

 

I wonder how many people read the Flick article, saw the fake comments, and decided to go with another power supplier based on those comments. Its a real shame that consumer NZ does not have the balls to publish the offending company. 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 


693 posts

Ultimate Geek


  #1820038 12-Jul-2017 08:56
Send private message

Wiggum:

 

Consumer New Zealand, "Choose what's right for you with confidence"

 

I wonder how many people read the Flick article, saw the fake comments, and decided to go with another power supplier based on those comments. Its a real shame that consumer NZ does not have the balls to publish the offending company. 

 

 

 

Yeh - lets ruin her life.





Amanon

BDFL - Memuneh
67870 posts

Uber Geek

Administrator
Trusted
Geekzone
Lifetime subscriber

  #1820040 12-Jul-2017 09:08
Send private message

It's an error of judgement but nonetheless shows the moral compass direction.





 

 

These links are referral codes

 

Geekzone broadband switch | Eletricity comparison and switch | Hatch investment (NZ$ 10 bonus if NZ$100 deposited within 30 days) | Sharesies | Mighty Ape | Backblaze | Amazon | My technology disclosure 


1199 posts

Uber Geek
Inactive user


  #1820042 12-Jul-2017 09:10
Send private message

Dulouz:

 

Wiggum:

 

Consumer New Zealand, "Choose what's right for you with confidence"

 

I wonder how many people read the Flick article, saw the fake comments, and decided to go with another power supplier based on those comments. Its a real shame that consumer NZ does not have the balls to publish the offending company. 

 

 

 

Yeh - lets ruin her life.

 

 

The offending company should be published. I think consumers have a right to know.

 

Nobody is asking to publish the persons name involved. Offending company should be the ones who decide to take further action against this individual, they can decide to publish her name or not, or simply fire her. But by the sounds of it, offending company does not even know this has happened.

 

CEO of consumer NZ, Sue Chetwin said the following:

 

. But what concerned me was the questioning of Consumer NZ’s integrity. One of the beauties of belonging to us is that people trust our advice. We’ve built a business on it. I rang the PR woman who posted it. I wanted to know whether this was company practice (we’re not talking a small PR firm here).

 

Now I am questioning Consumer NZ's integrity, they seem to be protecting this person, and what steps are they taking to stop this from happening again in the future. I normally trust the reviews on consumer NZ, that trust has now gone out of the window and I will just rank them the same as all other rubbish review sites out there. I sure as hell wont be subscribing to them in future, or reading their magazines.

 

 


5826 posts

Uber Geek


  #1821073 12-Jul-2017 10:11
Send private message

I remember 10 years ago talking to someone setting up a small website for their creative-based business, selling direct to consumers.

 

They told me that you couldn't just set up a website and wait for customers.  You also had to pay a review writing service to generate a whole lot of favourable reviews.  The reviews were about service standard rather than product quality.

 

 





Mike

5826 posts

Uber Geek


  #1821076 12-Jul-2017 10:13
Send private message

Dulouz:

 

It was probably a naive and over enthusiastic new graduate wanting to show her dedication to the cause.

 

 

Lucky for her she was able to turn on the water works enough for Sue Chetwin to feel sorry for her ...





Mike

BDFL - Memuneh
67870 posts

Uber Geek

Administrator
Trusted
Geekzone
Lifetime subscriber

  #1821078 12-Jul-2017 10:18
Send private message

MikeAqua:

 

I remember 10 years ago talking to someone setting up a small website for their creative-based business, selling direct to consumers.

 

They told me that you couldn't just set up a website and wait for customers.  You also had to pay a review writing service to generate a whole lot of favourable reviews.  The reviews were about service standard rather than product quality.

 

 

Yes and no. He was probably talking about those SEO spammers that go around posting how great something/service is in blog comments, forum posts, paid blog posts,etc, with link drops. This got so bad Google started penalising websites by reducing their presence in search results, based on the quality of inbound links.

 

At some point SEO experts started selling services to help companies remove these companies. They would then approach bloggers, forum owners asking to have these removed - and paying to remove it (ironic in the case of paid blog posts).

 

I have a couple of blog posts (original, not paid) where I mention one company or another and I posted a link. A SEO "expert" contacted me asking to remove those links. Since it was my blog post, not a paid service, original content, not spam, I didn't even consider. They created the mess, not my problem.

 

I've seen New Zealand companies fall for this. A job site with the perfect domain name hired a Christchurch SEO company to help them. This company in turn hired some Indian-based spammers to go around posting in blog comments and forums. When someone with the job company's owners name posted on Geekzone I thought it was strange - I know the guy and he wouldn't post with such bad English. That's when he found out his "SEO experts" were actually charging $5000/month to then dump a couple of hundred dollars on a spam service and pocket the rest without doing anything.

 

Another New Zealand SEO company, a "fast growth startup" charges a few thousand dollars a month to generate a "report" that is actually the same document for everyone, with just a find and replace of the client's name. Some suggestions are laughable and clearly shows they didn't even bother visiting their client's website for the assessment service.





 

 

These links are referral codes

 

Geekzone broadband switch | Eletricity comparison and switch | Hatch investment (NZ$ 10 bonus if NZ$100 deposited within 30 days) | Sharesies | Mighty Ape | Backblaze | Amazon | My technology disclosure 


 1 | 2 | 3
View this topic in a long page with up to 500 replies per page Create new topic




News »

Freeview On Demand app launches on Sony Android TVs
Posted 6-Aug-2020 13:35


UFB hits more than one million connections
Posted 6-Aug-2020 09:42


D-Link A/NZ extends COVR Wi-Fi EasyMesh System series with new three-pack
Posted 4-Aug-2020 15:01


New Zealand software Rfider tracks coffee from Colombia all the way to New Zealand businesses
Posted 3-Aug-2020 10:35


Logitech G launches Pro X Wireless gaming headset
Posted 3-Aug-2020 10:21


Sony Alpha 7S III provides supreme imaging performance
Posted 3-Aug-2020 10:11


Sony introduces first CFexpress Type A memory card
Posted 3-Aug-2020 10:05


Marsello acquires Goody consolidating online and in-store marketing position
Posted 30-Jul-2020 16:26


Fonterra first major customer for Microsoft's New Zealand datacentre
Posted 30-Jul-2020 08:07


Everything we learnt at the IBM Cloud Forum 2020
Posted 29-Jul-2020 14:45


Dropbox launches native HelloSign workflow and data residency in Australia
Posted 29-Jul-2020 12:48


Spark launches 5G in Palmerston North
Posted 29-Jul-2020 09:50


Lenovo brings speed and smarter features to new 5G mobile gaming phone
Posted 28-Jul-2020 22:00


Withings raises $60 million to enable bridge between patients and healthcare
Posted 28-Jul-2020 21:51


QNAP integrates Catalyst Cloud Object Storage into Hybrid Backup solution
Posted 28-Jul-2020 21:40



Geekzone Live »

Try automatic live updates from Geekzone directly in your browser, without refreshing the page, with Geekzone Live now.


Support Geekzone »

Our community of supporters help make Geekzone possible. Click the button below to join them.

Support Geezone on PressPatron



Are you subscribed to our RSS feed? You can download the latest headlines and summaries from our stories directly to your computer or smartphone by using a feed reader.

Alternatively, you can receive a daily email with Geekzone updates.