Geekzone: technology news, blogs, forums
Guest
Welcome Guest.
You haven't logged in yet. If you don't have an account you can register now.




39 posts

Geek


Topic # 89926 11-Sep-2011 16:58
Send private message


Hello,

I posted a while back about broadband in Waiheke. I've been here a few weeks and just attempted gaming. So far, it's almost playable but seems to suffer from lag spikes which makes things pretty frustrating with frequent rubber banding. Since I live in Omiha I won't be getting cabinetisation. So I wondered if there are alternatives for low latency connections?

I see Ynet advertises low latency wireless, I would've thought that wireless would have lousy latency. I can't see what other alternatives there are though. And the downside that they need to plonk a dish on the roof (there's already a sky dish and I don't know how the landlord will feel about another one...).

At this point I might just leave it, it's probably not worth it. What do you guys think?

Izo 

Create new topic
27250 posts

Uber Geek
+1 received by user: 6684

Moderator
Trusted
Biddle Corp
Lifetime subscriber

  Reply # 519607 11-Sep-2011 17:03
Send private message

Wireless latency will typically always be vastly superior to DSL.




39 posts

Geek


  Reply # 519613 11-Sep-2011 17:23
Send private message

Really? I see, my friend told me his friend has a microwave connection and the latency is pretty bad. I don't know what the difference would be between that an "normal" wifi, if any. Also looks like the YNet receiver is actually quite small, much smaller than a sky dish. Maybe worth investigating then. They're also a lot cheaper than Telecom...

Izo 

 
 
 
 


8027 posts

Uber Geek
+1 received by user: 387

Trusted
Subscriber

  Reply # 519718 11-Sep-2011 22:45
Send private message

sbiddle: Wireless latency will typically always be vastly superior to DSL.


I think he meant vastly higher aka worse, rather than "superior"

19282 posts

Uber Geek
+1 received by user: 2600
Inactive user


  Reply # 519728 11-Sep-2011 23:15
Send private message

Bidddle are you drinking?

27250 posts

Uber Geek
+1 received by user: 6684

Moderator
Trusted
Biddle Corp
Lifetime subscriber

  Reply # 519748 12-Sep-2011 06:19
Send private message

Ragnor:
sbiddle: Wireless latency will typically always be vastly superior to DSL.


I think he meant vastly higher aka worse, rather than "superior"


No I meant a lot better. Depending on the type of wirelless connection you're only looking at a few ms per hop. If you were an ISP offering wireless sevices on Waiheke and had fibre or DMR backhaul to the city there would be no reason why pings wouldn't be in the 5 ms range to Sky Tower.


Hawkes Bay
8477 posts

Uber Geek
+1 received by user: 5

Mod Emeritus
Trusted
Lifetime subscriber

  Reply # 519783 12-Sep-2011 09:06
Send private message

Speedtest on the left of my sig is wireless at my desk.
Speedtest on the right of my sig is ADSL at my home.

You can get poor latency on any networking technology if it is done wrong.







6359 posts

Uber Geek
+1 received by user: 316

Trusted
Subscriber

  Reply # 519785 12-Sep-2011 09:16
Send private message

Point to multipoint wireless systems that smaller WISPs typically deploy have very low latency compared to DSL.

Cyril

8027 posts

Uber Geek
+1 received by user: 387

Trusted
Subscriber

  Reply # 519854 12-Sep-2011 11:21
Send private message

cyril7: Point to multipoint wireless systems that smaller WISPs typically deploy have very low latency compared to DSL.

Cyril


Hmm I guess I was thinking more of Compass and NZ Wireless which iirc where much higher than the 16ms I get on ADSL to the first hop.

6359 posts

Uber Geek
+1 received by user: 316

Trusted
Subscriber

  Reply # 519864 12-Sep-2011 11:32
Send private message

As Steve mentioned above and from my experience 5mS to the core on even 2-3hop WISP systems is typical.

Cyril

998 posts

Ultimate Geek
+1 received by user: 168

UberGroup

  Reply # 519874 12-Sep-2011 11:49
Send private message

Ragnor:
cyril7: Point to multipoint wireless systems that smaller WISPs typically deploy have very low latency compared to DSL.

Cyril


Hmm I guess I was thinking more of Compass and NZ Wireless which iirc where much higher than the 16ms I get on ADSL to the first hop.


You remeber wrong, When I worked for NZW the first hop was normally under 10ms and infact alot of the time under 5ms. A budget of 16ms would get a cilent within 1-3km of the AP to the other side of a WiX connection, Of course any connections running over a large body of water would alter this but for the most part clients were over land to the AP and fairly close.

This is from 2006 onwards, I'm not sure how bad things were back in the day but I doubt they would have been higher than DSL back in the day aswell 




Most problems are the result of previous solutions...

All comment's I make are my own personal opinion and do not in any way, shape or form reflect the views of current or former employers unless specifically stated 

3889 posts

Uber Geek
+1 received by user: 164


  Reply # 519878 12-Sep-2011 11:54
Send private message

sbiddle: Wireless latency will typically always be vastly superior to DSL.



+1 

Steve is right.  I've spent a decade reading about how wireless is blar blar, so I finally set up my own network to prove right from wrong...  we get better performance from the wireless than both ADSL and HFC cable.

I know it 'should' be the other way around, but it's not.

Even in heavy snow, our wireless stayed up while the DSL services in the area fell over.






Promote New Zealand - Get yourself a .kiwi.nz domain name!!!

Check out mine - i.am.a.can.do.kiwi.nz - don@i.am.a.can.do.kiwi.nz


6359 posts

Uber Geek
+1 received by user: 316

Trusted
Subscriber

  Reply # 519882 12-Sep-2011 11:58
Send private message

You remeber wrong, When I worked for NZW the first hop was normally under 10ms and infact alot of the time under 5ms.


For older 802.11 based gear that would be right, newer gear with Time slot management is a lot shorter.

Cyril



39 posts

Geek


  Reply # 519928 12-Sep-2011 13:22
Send private message

Thanks guys, this sounds promising. Gives me a few questions to ask them when enquiring about it as well. 

 

Create new topic



Twitter »

Follow us to receive Twitter updates when new discussions are posted in our forums:



Follow us to receive Twitter updates when news items and blogs are posted in our frontpage:



Follow us to receive Twitter updates when tech item prices are listed in our price comparison site:



Geekzone Live »

Try automatic live updates from Geekzone directly in your browser, without refreshing the page, with Geekzone Live now.



Are you subscribed to our RSS feed? You can download the latest headlines and summaries from our stories directly to your computer or smartphone by using a feed reader.

Alternatively, you can receive a daily email with Geekzone updates.