Geekzone: technology news, blogs, forums
Guest
Welcome Guest.
You haven't logged in yet. If you don't have an account you can register now.


Geektastic

18009 posts

Uber Geek
+1 received by user: 8465

Trusted
Lifetime subscriber

#130738 26-Sep-2013 09:17
Send private message

I just took delivery of a 27" iMac.

It's a factory order as follows:

Processor - 3.4Ghz i7

RAM - 16Gb

HDD - 3 Tb Fusion

Graphics - standard card.

My main use is post processing and image library management for my professional photography.

I have a second monitor (Dell 27) hooked up via a mini display port/DVI adaptor.

This machine screams through tasks I do a lot. I had to get used to using Photoshop and InDesign because I am prepping files for printing in an exhibition. My 2006 Mac took about 30 seconds to open Photoshop CC - the new one takes less than 3 seconds! Saving layered .psd files is 50% quicker too. Opening and working with large TIFF files is barely slower than JPEG files.

The new screen is much less glossy than the previous iteration and although I still see some reflections they are ignorable now.

The all in one design is actually pretty funky and I quite like the extra space I get back from not having the Mac Pro in my office. I also very much like the fact that compared to a Mac Pro, it runs almost silently.

So just in conclusion, as a photographer's machine or a graphic artist's machine, this spec iMac is awesome.

I'm going to add another 16Gb of RAM to max it to 32Gb. There is an upgrade on the video card which doubles the on board ram from 1 to 2 Gb but I do not render video nor play games and decided that the $250 it cost would be better spent on more RAM.





Create new topic
clicknz
477 posts

Ultimate Geek
+1 received by user: 94

Trusted

  #902915 26-Sep-2013 10:12
Send private message

Nice!.... I wonder how the updated iMacs just announced will compare?

I'm currently using a prehistoric MacBook Pro attached to a Dell 24" monitor for my photography work and have been debating getting a new iMac or waiting for the next gen Mac Pro. Nice to hear your comments, thanks.




Cheers,
Mike

Photographer/Videographer clickmedia.nz




Geektastic

18009 posts

Uber Geek
+1 received by user: 8465

Trusted
Lifetime subscriber

  #902934 26-Sep-2013 10:48
Send private message

clicknz: Nice!.... I wonder how the updated iMacs just announced will compare?

I'm currently using a prehistoric MacBook Pro attached to a Dell 24" monitor for my photography work and have been debating getting a new iMac or waiting for the next gen Mac Pro. Nice to hear your comments, thanks.


Yeah - Mac always issue new ones just after I buy one!

That said I do not think that there is a massive difference in performance using those chips in a desktop. From what I have read, their main advantages come when used in a battery powered device.

I'm in the middle of a project right now and needed the new machine - it took 10 days to get it here due to useless NZ delivery systems that pack up and do no work on weekends so if I had waited until this new lot were ready the project deadline would pass before it arrived!!

I did think about the new Mac Pro but I suspect it will be very expensive and to be honest this one is perfectly fast enough for the uses I have. If I rendered hours of video then sure it would probably be better.





Dairyxox
1595 posts

Uber Geek
+1 received by user: 455


  #903337 26-Sep-2013 20:53
Send private message

Does it really matter?

The importance of opening and working with large TIFF files faster than someone else eludes me entirely.

See what I did there?



Geektastic

18009 posts

Uber Geek
+1 received by user: 8465

Trusted
Lifetime subscriber

  #903390 26-Sep-2013 22:01
Send private message

Dairyxox: Does it really matter?

The importance of opening and working with large TIFF files faster than someone else eludes me entirely.

See what I did there?


I'll tell you what. You come and edit the 90 or so I have in this project.

The psd files for some of the images are 1.2Gb alone.

Believe me, if you save 1 minute on file saving and/or opening, it makes a difference - it's an hour and a half per day you don't spend waiting for blue bars to fill up on 90 images.





Geektastic

18009 posts

Uber Geek
+1 received by user: 8465

Trusted
Lifetime subscriber

  #905508 1-Oct-2013 08:34
Send private message

To further demonstrate the need for faster saving and opening, I am working on images for my exhibition at the moment.

The layered Photoshop files are averaging 1.1Gb per image....





DravidDavid
1907 posts

Uber Geek
+1 received by user: 305


  #905628 1-Oct-2013 12:09
Send private message

It definitely makes a huge difference.

I'm not a Mac user, but being able to load a whole project in to RAM or several 1GB+ files in to RAM and work with them from there is a far better workflow. You save time not only when it comes to loading, saving and editing files, but the amount of times your editing software crashes reduces significantly on better hardware.

I have 16GB of RAM and regularly hit 12 to 15 when in Photoshop, Maya or even CuBase. 32GB would be a better step over the bigger video card.

 
 
 
 

Shop now for Lenovo laptops and other devices (affiliate link).
Geektastic

18009 posts

Uber Geek
+1 received by user: 8465

Trusted
Lifetime subscriber

  #906775 2-Oct-2013 22:37
Send private message

DravidDavid: It definitely makes a huge difference.

I'm not a Mac user, but being able to load a whole project in to RAM or several 1GB+ files in to RAM and work with them from there is a far better workflow. You save time not only when it comes to loading, saving and editing files, but the amount of times your editing software crashes reduces significantly on better hardware.

I have 16GB of RAM and regularly hit 12 to 15 when in Photoshop, Maya or even CuBase. 32GB would be a better step over the bigger video card.


I agree.

I have another 16Gb of RAM en route from OWC - should be here next week to up my machine to the 32Gb max.

Now if only we had a decent selection of Thunderbolt drives in NZ that did not cost way too much...!





Create new topic








Geekzone Live »

Try automatic live updates from Geekzone directly in your browser, without refreshing the page, with Geekzone Live now.



Are you subscribed to our RSS feed? You can download the latest headlines and summaries from our stories directly to your computer or smartphone by using a feed reader.