Geekzone: technology news, blogs, forums
Guest
Welcome Guest.
You haven't logged in yet. If you don't have an account you can register now.




15776 posts

Uber Geek
+1 received by user: 4284

Trusted
Lifetime subscriber

Topic # 87611 2-Aug-2011 18:07
Send private message

HI There!

We use WD Elements 2.5" Hard disks for client backups but recently have thought perhaps we should find something a bit faster. Could someone recommend something not massively more expensive but with better performance we could try as an alternative?

Create new topic
423 posts

Ultimate Geek
+1 received by user: 8


  Reply # 500950 2-Aug-2011 18:16
Send private message

You're not likely to see speeds above 30MB/s on USB 2.

If you're getting anywhere over 25 MB/s, then the bottleneck is likely the USB 2 interface, instead of the hard drive. I know that USB 2 is specified as 480Mbps (60 MB/s) but I've never seen a transfer speed over 35 MB/s. There's a lot of overhead involved.

Modern hard drives generally outperform the USB 2 interface.

If possible, you should transition to eSATA or USB 3.0.

3267 posts

Uber Geek
+1 received by user: 77

Trusted

  Reply # 500980 2-Aug-2011 19:29
Send private message

Get a 3.5" hard drive and definitely an external power supply. The 2.5" laptop hard drives are slower, and USB can not deliver enough power to run a fast hard drive. If you want to ensure high speed then it is better to buy a hard drive enclosure and fit your own hard drive. Find a drive with a large cache and rated for performance. Anything "green" will be slow.

Seagate (specifically, perhaps others also) had issues a few years ago due to squeezing too much into less platters. Their 7200.11 drives had reliability issues. I believe the 7200.12 drives are better, but not familiar with the ones released in the past 1-2 years. Whatever you get, it is worth reading up reviews and spend a bit of time searching for reports of issues.




You can never have enough Volvos!


 
 
 
 


gzt

9397 posts

Uber Geek
+1 received by user: 1365


  Reply # 500999 2-Aug-2011 19:51
Send private message

Are you imaging the disk? or some other kind of backup like robocopy? ,etc? Because it is possible you might get better performance changing the method, than changing the hardware. What size is your typical backup operation?





15776 posts

Uber Geek
+1 received by user: 4284

Trusted
Lifetime subscriber

  Reply # 501034 2-Aug-2011 21:06
Send private message

Shadowprotect.

11 posts

Geek


  Reply # 501057 2-Aug-2011 21:49
Send private message

networkn: Shadowprotect.


Are you using an internal staging drive and Image Repository?

Is this HDD to be used / updated everyday?

Full or incremental backup's?   And what is your rotation cycle?

Cheers!

gzt

9397 posts

Uber Geek
+1 received by user: 1365


  Reply # 501068 2-Aug-2011 22:00
Send private message

networkn: Shadowprotect.


Next time you have it running, what kind of throughput does it show?

If you are using the gui it is displayed in the volume tab of the job information. Not sure where to find it if you are using other methods.



15776 posts

Uber Geek
+1 received by user: 4284

Trusted
Lifetime subscriber

  Reply # 501070 2-Aug-2011 22:02
Send private message

Was reporting 100MB+ a second but that's not really possible (Write caching was enabled).

13557 posts

Uber Geek
+1 received by user: 2322

Trusted
Subscriber

  Reply # 501074 2-Aug-2011 22:11
Send private message

USB 2.0 disks or even flash drives are really slow, they don't go near as fast as the theoretical bandwidth available. A modern 2.5" disk can do 80-120MB/sec, so USB or eSata is really necessary to reach maximum speeds.




AWS Certified Solution Architect Professional, Sysop Administrator Associate, and Developer Associate
TOGAF certified enterprise architect
Professional photographer


gzt

9397 posts

Uber Geek
+1 received by user: 1365


  Reply # 501079 2-Aug-2011 22:22
Send private message

networkn: Was reporting 100MB+ a second but that's not really possible (Write caching was enabled).

I guess that was a silly question. Time total vs image size might be better.

11 posts

Geek


  Reply # 501080 2-Aug-2011 22:24
Send private message

gzt:
networkn: Was reporting 100MB+ a second but that's not really possible (Write caching was enabled).

I guess that was a silly question. Time total vs image size might be better.


Or use the Physical disk writes bytes/sec from Perfmon

gzt

9397 posts

Uber Geek
+1 received by user: 1365


  Reply # 502517 5-Aug-2011 18:49
Send private message

I have some marginal suggestions. Not familiar with SP, here's what I was going to suggest if the transfer rate is suboptimum for USB2. If it is compressing during the create (or esp. encrypting) that will be cpu bound on slower machines. Might get better overall transfer by reducing the SP compression ratio (no idea if reduction is possible).

Depending on network quality there *might* be an opportunity get /slightly/ better performance moving to a small NAS device. I'd guess there is a bit of skill in picking one in your price range which will give the performance required but might be worth a shot if you have one lying around to try.

Like Niel's suggestion as well.

[edit: stating the obvious but depending on numbers a usb3 card for each machine might be cost effective] 

Create new topic



Twitter »

Follow us to receive Twitter updates when new discussions are posted in our forums:



Follow us to receive Twitter updates when news items and blogs are posted in our frontpage:



Follow us to receive Twitter updates when tech item prices are listed in our price comparison site:





News »

CPTPP text and National Interest Analysis released for public scrutiny
Posted 21-Feb-2018 19:43


Foodstuffs to trial digitised shopping trolleys
Posted 21-Feb-2018 18:27


2018: The year of zero-login, smart cars & the biometrics of things
Posted 21-Feb-2018 18:25


Intel reimagines data centre storage with new 3D NAND SSDs
Posted 16-Feb-2018 15:21


Ground-breaking business programme begins in Hamilton
Posted 16-Feb-2018 10:18


Government to continue search for first Chief Technology Officer
Posted 12-Feb-2018 20:30


Time to take Appleā€™s iPad Pro seriously
Posted 12-Feb-2018 16:54


New Fujifilm X-A5 brings selfie features to mirrorless camera
Posted 9-Feb-2018 09:12


D-Link ANZ expands connected smart home with new HD Wi-Fi cameras
Posted 9-Feb-2018 09:01


Dragon Professional for Mac V6: Near perfect dictation
Posted 9-Feb-2018 08:26


OPPO announces R11s with claims to be the picture perfect smartphone
Posted 2-Feb-2018 13:28


Vocus Communications wins a place on the TaaS panel
Posted 26-Jan-2018 15:16


SwipedOn raises $1 million capital
Posted 26-Jan-2018 15:15


Slingshot offers unlimited gigabit fibre for under a ton
Posted 25-Jan-2018 13:51


Spark doubles down on wireless broadband
Posted 24-Jan-2018 15:44



Geekzone Live »

Try automatic live updates from Geekzone directly in your browser, without refreshing the page, with Geekzone Live now.



Are you subscribed to our RSS feed? You can download the latest headlines and summaries from our stories directly to your computer or smartphone by using a feed reader.

Alternatively, you can receive a daily email with Geekzone updates.