Geekzone: technology news, blogs, forums
Guest
Welcome Guest.
You haven't logged in yet. If you don't have an account you can register now.


nzkc

1634 posts

Uber Geek
+1 received by user: 1041


#306524 1-Aug-2023 08:32
Send private message

As reported by The Register: https://www.theregister.com/2023/07/31/aws_says_ipv4_addresses_cost/

 

This might be the push that a lot of companies and RSPs/ISPs need to finally start supporting IPv6.  I would expect a lot of other hosting players to follow suit (if they do not already charge you)


Create new topic
Beccara
1473 posts

Uber Geek
+1 received by user: 517

ID Verified

  #3110290 1-Aug-2023 08:37
Send private message

The way everyone's been reporting this I was expecting to find out it was like $20-30USD per IP but nope, $3.5. At work it'll add about $2500 USD a year to our bill, no where near enough to cover the engineering costs in testing IPv6 or dealing with issues from end users.

 

It more feels like an inflation price adjustment than a serious push to free up IPv4 space





Most problems are the result of previous solutions...

All comment's I make are my own personal opinion and do not in any way, shape or form reflect the views of current or former employers unless specifically stated 



michaelmurfy
meow
13579 posts

Uber Geek
+1 received by user: 10910

Moderator
ID Verified
Trusted
Lifetime subscriber

  #3110317 1-Aug-2023 10:36
Send private message

@Beccara But the key element here is there anything you can do in order to trim the fat? Are there IP addresses you don't need? Could you implement a load balancer to free up IP addressing and lower that bill further?

 

Amazon are not pushing you to use IPv6 but are pushing for responsible IPv4 use. Not everything needs a full blown public V4 address when there are other options such as private IP addresses, IPv6 and heck even NAT but now is also the time to consider adoption of responsible use as well as potentially adopting IPv6 so you're ready for the next price hike too.

 

I fully expect companies will be looking at this like it isn't so bad without looking at the bigger picture down the line where the cost can continue to go up.





Michael Murphy | https://murfy.nz
Referral Links: Quic Broadband (use R122101E7CV7Q for free setup)

Are you happy with what you get from Geekzone? Please consider supporting us by subscribing.
Opinions are my own and not the views of my employer.


timmmay
20858 posts

Uber Geek
+1 received by user: 5350

Trusted
Lifetime subscriber

  #3110405 1-Aug-2023 12:49
Send private message

AWS accouncement, plus an info blog post about saving money on IPv4 addresses. They'll be about NZ$5 per month, $60 per year. This applies to all public IPv4 addresses, including EC2 servers, public load balancers (which use at least three IPv4 addresses), VPNs, NAT gateways, etc. Many big AWS customers will have public IPs on every EC2 server just because they were lazy, so it could cost them a fair bit - but those customers will have massive bills anyway. Some servers will have public IPs and elastic IPs, through laziness. This new charge might end up triggering cost saving exercises which end up saving customers money. It will save AWS money through not having to buy more expensive IPs - I heard their IPv4 pool is one of their largest assets.

 

For my personal EC2 server (a t3a.nano with a reserved instance to make it ever cheaper) I'm moving it to IPv6 only, with CloudFlare in front of it. CloudFlare gives it IPv4 and IPv6, CloudFlare connects to the server using IPv6 only. The server already had IPv6, it only took me an hour to change two of the sites over to IPv6 only. It shouldn't take long to move the other websites over to IPv6.


Create new topic








Geekzone Live »

Try automatic live updates from Geekzone directly in your browser, without refreshing the page, with Geekzone Live now.



Are you subscribed to our RSS feed? You can download the latest headlines and summaries from our stories directly to your computer or smartphone by using a feed reader.