Clarification of NZ law and cache servers hosting illegal content

Forums › ICT Policies and Regulation › Clarification of NZ law and cache servers hosting illegal content

jjnz1

1324 posts

Uber Geek

Lifetime subscriber

#81547 14-Apr-2011 09:20

Hi guys,

Is someone in the know with the current (and immediate) law about what will happen to companies that provide cache servers (not just isp's) that hold content due to illegal file sharing among others?

Are these cache servers currently immune from existing law? In particular, from the new file sharing amendment bill?

Any help would be appreciated.

valtam

396 posts

Ultimate Geek

#458598 14-Apr-2011 10:31

In a landmark court case, wouldn't you try to prove that the original downloader of the material that was first cached should have been prosecuted before anyone else? Surely this would stop any future illegal activity in the first instance? How would you do this? You would require the cooperation of the ISP...Is the ISP subject to any legal action not merely for hosting but for also acting as an intermediary for the content?

Support a locally made Linux based Operating System, try Linux Lite.
Download Linux Lite

GoodSync

GoodSync. Easily back up and sync your files with GoodSync. Simple and secure file backup and synchronisation software will ensure that your files are never lost (affiliate link).

freitasm

BDFL - Memuneh
76326 posts

Uber Geek

Administrator

ID Verified

Trusted

Geekzone

Lifetime subscriber

#458600 14-Apr-2011 10:33

Companies that provide caches are exempt.

Please support Geekzone by subscribing, or using one of our referral links: Dosh referral: 00001283 | Sharesies | Goodsync | Mighty Ape | Backblaze

freitasm on Keybase | My technology disclosure

richms

26384 posts

Uber Geek

Trusted

Subscriber

#459556 16-Apr-2011 21:50

The law only covers the end user who uses p2p software, its quite specific about the software, so all those people who are going on about getting their internet cut off for emailing a picture of kittens are really smoking something.

Cache is already covered by them being a telco etc and so long as they act on complaints for content that is in violation they are sweet as. I dont know what process the likes of slingshot have to disable caching of certain torrent hashes or certain parts of those torrents, since I am assuming they would only have to prevent the caching of the infringing files in a multi file torrent.

Richard rich.ms

tdgeek

28580 posts

Uber Geek

Trusted

Lifetime subscriber

#459576 16-Apr-2011 23:55

Caching is a non issue. It only serves to reduce costs for an ISP and to increase speed for end users.

Caching or no caching is not a solution or assistance to stopping illegal filesharing and downloading. $15000 may be more effective??