|
|
|
vexxxboy:i dont know , is this the first time that confirmed cases are lower than Probable
Nope, yesterday was 8 Confirmed vs 9 Probable
vexxxboy:
i dont know , is this the first time that confirmed cases are lower than Probable
Off the top of my head, I think yesterday there were 8 confirmed and 9 probable.
It'll be interesting to see if many of the probables are eventually removed from case totals. I think up to about 1/3 of actual cases test negative from one swab, some test negative from multiple swabs. I don't know if they re-test using a serological test even if that's also got flaws - would seem like a reasonably good idea to me, but I don't know.
Isolating people with "suspected" C-19 even if it turns out to have been some other respiratory infection is a pretty good move.
Fred99:
Isolating people with "suspected" C-19 even if it turns out to have been some other respiratory infection is a pretty good move.
Was that in questions, which I missed. A good move, conservative. You will always fail on the side of over estimating, which is by far the safest way.
tdgeek:
Fred99:
Isolating people with "suspected" C-19 even if it turns out to have been some other respiratory infection is a pretty good move.
Was that in questions, which I missed. A good move, conservative. You will always fail on the side of over estimating, which is by far the safest way.
No - just my opinion and I think an expected result of having "probable" cases an overestimate of eventual confirmed cases. It was mentioned yesterday (IIRC) that they expected to see a reduction in other transmissible respiratory infections.
Fred99:
No - just my opinion and I think an expected result of having "probable" cases an overestimate of eventual confirmed cases. It was mentioned yesterday (IIRC) that they expected to see a reduction in other transmissible respiratory infections.
Ah. Its a noticeable feature that overseas, there is so much chatter about under reporting cases, deaths, everything, for a variety of reasons. Lil ol NZ is doing very well, and as you say, probably over reporting.

nzkiwiman:I am trying to decide if paying $60-80 for 50 disposable masks on Trademe is "smart"; I know that there is almost no benefit of having a mask if you don't have any issues - they don't do anything to stop the nasties getting in - and a mask is really to stop you from spreading any nasties you may have
Another thing to consider is that you're signalling that you're being careful by wearing a mask. It may do very little to protect you, but it's signalling to anyone you encounter that you're aware of, and taking, precautions to deal with Covid19.
freitasm:"New York City’s coronavirus death toll soared past 10,000 after officials added more than 3,700 people who had never tested positive for the virus but were presumed to have died of it."
Starter for ten, "What will Trump's response to this be?". Replies to the Trump thread please :-).
I'm just imagining any number of late-night TV hosts/comedians doing their Trump impressions of his response...
Rikkitic:I am elderly and vulnerable, but otherwise relatively healthy and self-sufficient. If I need something (done), I am perfectly capable of doing it for myself. Yet this kind of thinking basically condemns me to spending the rest of my life in lockdown. That sucks and people who think that is a good idea suck. The economy matters, but people matter more.
I'm not (yet) in a high-risk category but I live in a street with a number of people who are: retired nurse, retired serviceman, retired special-needs teacher, still-working but older special-needs teacher, and others. These people have done more for their country and community than Thornley ever has or will, and f**d if I'm going to gamble their lives just because Thornley wants to test his (deeply flawed) theory with them.
kingdragonfly: The Guardian, sports news: Helmut Marko wanted Red Bull's F1 drivers to deliberately catch coronavirus
Why doesn't the story refer to him as "Helmut Marko, Red Bull’s newly-dismissed former head of driver development"?

neb:nzkiwiman:I am trying to decide if paying $60-80 for 50 disposable masks on Trademe is "smart"; I know that there is almost no benefit of having a mask if you don't have any issues - they don't do anything to stop the nasties getting in - and a mask is really to stop you from spreading any nasties you may have
Another thing to consider is that you're signalling that you're being careful by wearing a mask. It may do very little to protect you, but it's signalling to anyone you encounter that you're aware of, and taking, precautions to deal with Covid19.
As a followup to this, what are people's thoughts on wearing masks just to indicate that you're being careful and following precautions? The standard crapvendors now have masks for as little as USD5 including shipping, which makes it reasonable value for money as a means of telling others that you're being careful.
|
|
|