Geekzone: technology news, blogs, forums
Guest
Welcome Guest.
You haven't logged in yet. If you don't have an account you can register now.


2467 posts

Uber Geek
+1 received by user: 667


Topic # 143902 30-Apr-2014 22:24
Send private message

And I quote:

"Hi Neil,

Save 20 cents per litre on fuel at The Bottle-O Pukekohe*

Visit The Bottle-O Pukekohe this Thursday, Friday (open from 1pm), Saturday or Sunday, spend $50 or more in a single transaction and swipe your AA Smartfuel card to save 20 cents per litre on fuel.*

Never drink and drive.


AA Smartfuel – Swipe more...save more.

*Offer is valid from 24 to 27 April 2014, only at The Bottle-O Pukekohe. Excludes Tobacco."

I'm somewhat bemused by a targeted (my area) link promoting a bottlestore (specific product range) for fuel discounts?

Now I agree "Never drink and drive." Is a good cover statement, and adults can and should drink 'sensibly' but alcohol (and speed) are the worlds greatest driving risks, surely this is just a bad image for the AA??

Create new topic
574 posts

Ultimate Geek
+1 received by user: 93


  Reply # 1034470 1-May-2014 08:04
3 people support this post
Send private message

Only in the same way the Burger King incentives encourage obesity and the Repco incentives encourage poor taste vehicle modifications.

7830 posts

Uber Geek
+1 received by user: 782

Subscriber

  Reply # 1034486 1-May-2014 08:36
One person supports this post
Send private message

Fine as far as I'm concerned.. 




Regards,

Old3eyes


4123 posts

Uber Geek
+1 received by user: 842
Inactive user


  Reply # 1034489 1-May-2014 08:43
Send private message

I have no problem with it.

I got one for 30 cents off at Repco this weekend, didnt say anything about dont sniff thinners and drive though, now thats something we should all be up in arms about!

6698 posts

Uber Geek
+1 received by user: 3455


  Reply # 1034591 1-May-2014 10:10
Send private message

I see what you're saying - and IIRC alcohol advertisers have to be extremely careful elsewhere to meet standards with product association with some activities, sport, young people, and driving etc.
In one particular instance (tobacco products) these must not be sold with incentives such as discount vouchers, and aren't included in the total/ don't qualify for fuel discount vouchers, but that's not the case with alcohol.
It doesn't bother me that it isn't - as you could end up not allowing incentives for (probably more than) half the garbage so-called "food" sold in supermarkets.
I'm less happy with the concept of fuel discount vouchers in the first place.  IMO the fuel companies use this by striking deals with partners to offer large (ie 20c or more) discounts when the dollar is stronger and/or the oil price drops - instead of dropping the headline price.  This obfuscates the "real" price, and as such works counter to the intent of the Commerce Act to increase competition. 

19282 posts

Uber Geek
+1 received by user: 2600
Inactive user


  Reply # 1034598 1-May-2014 10:19
Send private message

No issue at all

2984 posts

Uber Geek
+1 received by user: 453

Trusted
Subscriber

  Reply # 1034638 1-May-2014 10:51
Send private message

Fred99: I see what you're saying - and IIRC alcohol advertisers have to be extremely careful elsewhere to meet standards with product association with some activities, sport, young people, and driving etc.
In one particular instance (tobacco products) these must not be sold with incentives such as discount vouchers, and aren't included in the total/ don't qualify for fuel discount vouchers, but that's not the case with alcohol.
It doesn't bother me that it isn't - as you could end up not allowing incentives for (probably more than) half the garbage so-called "food" sold in supermarkets.
I'm less happy with the concept of fuel discount vouchers in the first place.  IMO the fuel companies use this by striking deals with partners to offer large (ie 20c or more) discounts when the dollar is stronger and/or the oil price drops - instead of dropping the headline price.  This obfuscates the "real" price, and as such works counter to the intent of the Commerce Act to increase competition. 


Plus, fuel discount vouchers actually harm small business too - in some cases, they drop the price you pay for the fuel to less than the franchisee had to pay the supplier to get the fuel in the first place, resulting in your purchase actually making them a loss (which they can't avoid because the franchise agreement requires they accept the voucher).  Bonus points for paying with the Visa/Mastercard/Amex for even more loss.  It's why they're so pushy about getting you to buy 2 V bottles for $6, or a bottle of milk and loaf of bread for $5.50.

6698 posts

Uber Geek
+1 received by user: 3455


  Reply # 1034771 1-May-2014 13:00
Send private message

Kyanar:
Fred99: I see what you're saying - and IIRC alcohol advertisers have to be extremely careful elsewhere to meet standards with product association with some activities, sport, young people, and driving etc.
In one particular instance (tobacco products) these must not be sold with incentives such as discount vouchers, and aren't included in the total/ don't qualify for fuel discount vouchers, but that's not the case with alcohol.
It doesn't bother me that it isn't - as you could end up not allowing incentives for (probably more than) half the garbage so-called "food" sold in supermarkets.
I'm less happy with the concept of fuel discount vouchers in the first place.  IMO the fuel companies use this by striking deals with partners to offer large (ie 20c or more) discounts when the dollar is stronger and/or the oil price drops - instead of dropping the headline price.  This obfuscates the "real" price, and as such works counter to the intent of the Commerce Act to increase competition. 


Plus, fuel discount vouchers actually harm small business too - in some cases, they drop the price you pay for the fuel to less than the franchisee had to pay the supplier to get the fuel in the first place, resulting in your purchase actually making them a loss (which they can't avoid because the franchise agreement requires they accept the voucher).  Bonus points for paying with the Visa/Mastercard/Amex for even more loss.  It's why they're so pushy about getting you to buy 2 V bottles for $6, or a bottle of milk and loaf of bread for $5.50.


There's an old concept in business transactions/negotiations that the ideal outcome is "win-win" - when both parties benefit.  Add a third party (the consumer) to the other two (fuel company and loyalty partner) and "win-win-win" was never going to happen.  It's win-win for them - but not for the consumer - that was never part of the plan.
The oil companies have been making it tough for small owner operators for many years, and in many different ways.  In a way they're a fourth "partner" in these schemes - and I expect they are getting screwed as you say.
These fuel/grocery schemes originated in Aussie.  I believe that the ACCC -prompted by the media and/or politicians - had some serious concerns, but allowed them to continue.  I suppose the Commerce Commission here took a lead from the Aussies.  They had the same media scrutiny on (lack of) competition between fuel companies as we've had here.  Now while they (oil companies) might or might not be "price gouging" or operating an informal cartel, adding price obfuscation by use of these loyalty plans would make it very hard for anybody to see what's really going on.  It (obfuscation of price to avoid direct price comparison and to make scrutiny difficult) isn't confined to the fuel business.  Telecom providers and electricity supply companies had this (price obfuscation) worked out to their advantage long before the oil companies started playing their version of the game.



2926 posts

Uber Geek
+1 received by user: 716


  Reply # 1034779 1-May-2014 13:12
Send private message

Fred99: These fuel/grocery schemes originated in Aussie.  I believe that the ACCC -prompted by the media and/or politicians - had some serious concerns, but allowed them to continue.


... but limited the size of the discount, as noted in this article:

"The New Zealand Commerce Commission says it is not considering following the example of its Australian counterpart which has extracted undertakings from the Coles and Woolworths supermarket chains to limit their fuel discounts to A4c a litre from next year."


3337 posts

Uber Geek
+1 received by user: 641

Trusted

  Reply # 1034783 1-May-2014 13:15
Send private message

i drink, i drive, i dont do both at the same time.  

no problem with it at all.

xpd

Chief Trash Bandit
8795 posts

Uber Geek
+1 received by user: 1283

Mod Emeritus
Trusted
Lifetime subscriber

  Reply # 1034790 1-May-2014 13:23
Send private message

But your'e allowed to drink and drive...just not over the limit.




XPD / Gavin / DemiseNZ

 

For Free Games, Geekiness and Reviews, visit :

 

Home Of The Overrated Raccoons

 

Battlenet : XPD#11535    Origin/Steam/Epic/Uplay : xpdnz


6698 posts

Uber Geek
+1 received by user: 3455


  Reply # 1034797 1-May-2014 13:29
Send private message

jonathan18:
Fred99: These fuel/grocery schemes originated in Aussie.  I believe that the ACCC -prompted by the media and/or politicians - had some serious concerns, but allowed them to continue.


... but limited the size of the discount, as noted in this article:

"The New Zealand Commerce Commission says it is not considering following the example of its Australian counterpart which has extracted undertakings from the Coles and Woolworths supermarket chains to limit their fuel discounts to A4c a litre from next year."



Good news (for the Aussie consumer) - the ACCC has nailed them.
Aussie competition watchdog has always had more balls than CommComm here.
Same with APRA (my cousin was an economist for APRA who stayed with me when over here to meet with NZ government to negotiate harmonising APRA and NZ prudential oversight - about a decade ago).
NZ told the Aussies where to go - "we'll do it our way" instead.  I got a lecture from my unhappy cuzzie - who laid out a very accurate prediction of exactly what did turn out to happen to the NZ finance company sector post GFC - something which cost NZ billions.

Create new topic

Twitter »

Follow us to receive Twitter updates when new discussions are posted in our forums:



Follow us to receive Twitter updates when news items and blogs are posted in our frontpage:



Follow us to receive Twitter updates when tech item prices are listed in our price comparison site:





News »

Hawaiki Transpacific cable ready-for-service
Posted 20-Jul-2018 11:29


Microsoft Dynamics 365 Business Central launches
Posted 10-Jul-2018 10:40


Spark completes first milestone in voice platform upgrade
Posted 10-Jul-2018 09:36


Microsoft ices heated developers
Posted 6-Jul-2018 20:16


PB Technologies charged for its extended warranties and warned for bait advertising
Posted 3-Jul-2018 15:45


Almost 20,000 people claim credits from Spark
Posted 29-Jun-2018 10:40


Cove sells NZ's first insurance policy via chatbot
Posted 25-Jun-2018 10:04


N4L helping TAKA Trust bridge the digital divide for Lower Hutt students
Posted 18-Jun-2018 13:08


Winners Announced for 2018 CIO Awards
Posted 18-Jun-2018 13:03


Logitech Rally sets new standard for USB-connected video conference cameras
Posted 18-Jun-2018 09:27


Russell Stanners steps down as Vodafone NZ CEO
Posted 12-Jun-2018 09:13


Intergen recognised as 2018 Microsoft Country Partner of the Year for New Zealand
Posted 12-Jun-2018 08:00


Finalists Announced For Microsoft NZ Partner Awards
Posted 6-Jun-2018 15:12


Vocus Group and Vodafone announce joint venture to accelerate fibre innovation
Posted 5-Jun-2018 10:52


Kogan.com to launch Kogan Mobile in New Zealand
Posted 4-Jun-2018 14:34



Geekzone Live »

Try automatic live updates from Geekzone directly in your browser, without refreshing the page, with Geekzone Live now.



Are you subscribed to our RSS feed? You can download the latest headlines and summaries from our stories directly to your computer or smartphone by using a feed reader.

Alternatively, you can receive a daily email with Geekzone updates.