|
|
|
Health reforms have never really equated to better outcomes, regardless of the leaning of the party that implements them, for no other reason than so much money is spent on undoing something first. As has been stated numerous times in this (and other political threads), without a long term plan, agreed to by all major parties, we will continue the cycle of wasting money to reform / repeal / reform / repeal, lining the pockets of various expert consultants / special interest groups.
Thank goodness you can't implement that tax policy.......... :)
Dumb question number one - would it be better to have free GP visits after your first 3 paid visits ? or maybe first two, so you know you'll never pay more than 'something' a year ?
and/or how about setting the fees to the lowest value in the country ? I believe low income areas pay less, make that fee nationwide.
...there's probably very good reasons why these are obviously dumb ideas, so please point them out.
Also, as mentioned previously somewhere, ban politicians from having private health care.
“The modern conservative is engaged in one of man's oldest exercises in moral philosophy; that is, the search for a superior moral justification for selfishness.” -John Kenneth Galbraith
rb99
sen8or:
Health reforms have never really equated to better outcomes, regardless of the leaning of the party that implements them, for no other reason than so much money is spent on undoing something first. As has been stated numerous times in this (and other political threads), without a long term plan, agreed to by all major parties, we will continue the cycle of wasting money to reform / repeal / reform / repeal, lining the pockets of various expert consultants / special interest groups.
Thank goodness you can't implement that tax policy.......... :)
Tsk, nobody ever wants to try my tax policies ...
iPad Pro 11" + iPhone 15 Pro Max + 2degrees 4tw!
These comments are my own and do not represent the opinions of 2degrees.
rb99: Also, as mentioned previously somewhere, ban politicians from having private health care.
rb99:
Dumb question number one - would it be better to have free GP visits after your first 3 paid visits ? or maybe first two, so you know you'll never pay more than 'something' a year ?
and/or how about setting the fees to the lowest value in the country ? I believe low income areas pay less, make that fee nationwide.
...there's probably very good reasons why these are obviously dumb ideas, so please point them out.
Also, as mentioned previously somewhere, ban politicians from having private health care.
In terms of what's the best outcome for patients, yes, probably. In terms of a sound-bite-ready policy to get a CGT over the line, "3 free GP visits" works better.
Also, the former policy will probably cost a lot more. If you're the kind of person who will get value from 3 free GP visits every year, you're probably going to the GP a lot more than 3 times a year. I've been 3 times in the last 12 months (once being for a repeat) but prior to that I think it might have been twice in the last 6 years? Right now at least, I only get issues that the doctor will only prescribe "stay home in bed" or over-the-counter stuff, so I see little point in wasting their time and my money.
But the very old or the very young? Yeah, great for them!
iPad Pro 11" + iPhone 15 Pro Max + 2degrees 4tw!
These comments are my own and do not represent the opinions of 2degrees.
I'm on 2 a year visits for blood pressure / cholesterol. I tried the old "can't I get a years worth of scripts" thing at my last visit, but no dice, so even though the "can" issue 12 month prescriptions (or allow repeats within that period), they don't have to.
Fees can't be set the same country wide, the individual clinics face very real differences in costs across the country. Where a clinic in Waimate might cost two cows, a sheep and some wallaby pelts each week for its lease, not so much in Remuera, thats at least a german sports car just to open the doors. Reimbursement rates could be set the same (are they for ACC?), but then there'll just be surcharges applied to each visit like there is now with the private emergency clinics
It's the same as saying "there will be tax cuts up to ... " but in reality only 20 families in the whole country qualified for that.
Referral links: Quic Broadband (free setup code: R587125ERQ6VE) | Samsung | AliExpress | Wise | Sharesies
Support Geekzone by subscribing (browse ads-free), or making a one-off or recurring donation through PressPatron.
Doctors also need more people able to afford visiting more often.
Economics of running a practice are under pressure.
Older Doctors retire. We have not only trained fewer, but economics of the whole thing hit as well.
Then comparisons with going elsewhere.
Rinse and repeat for dentistry.
Pharmacies, the small business close to you that can spend more time offering personalized advice etc.
These are being hollowed out by Warehouse operations that now want Government to pass on need for qualified Pharmacists.
Hospitals got hit by ACT/National austerity as well, so we incur debt in poor facilities poorly staffed.
For a future Government to try to fix 'everything all at once'. Catch up putting further strain on spending.
As for the employer class.
Is it an advantage, more productive to have a healthy worker who can have their mind on the job?
Some spare resource in their life to even upskill take on some night school training etc.
A worker with unstable accommodation is also less likely to be very productive, reliable,
and may skip off for any small increase in pay elsewhere too.
There are unskilled jobs where dog eat dog seems to work, or does it really.
Fortunately, Luxon committed to evidence-based policies in both the coalition agreements with NZF and ACT so we will surely see this ridiculous LNG terminal plan dropped immediately and replaced with an equally well-funded campaign to put solar panels and batteries on every house in New Zealand, which some studies showed could have reduced 2024 wholesale peak prices by half.
iPad Pro 11" + iPhone 15 Pro Max + 2degrees 4tw!
These comments are my own and do not represent the opinions of 2degrees.
If it is dropped taxpayers will still likely be paying due to cancelled agreements like what happened with the ferries. There is no accountability because all they often dois kick the can down the road for someone else to deal with in the future and most politicians have a very short shelf life
mattwnz:
If it is dropped taxpayers will still likely be paying due to cancelled agreements like what happened with the ferries. There is no accountability because all they often dois kick the can down the road for someone else to deal with in the future and most politicians have a very short shelf life
It is my understanding that right now they haven't actually signed any contracts.
iPad Pro 11" + iPhone 15 Pro Max + 2degrees 4tw!
These comments are my own and do not represent the opinions of 2degrees.
SaltyNZ:
It is my understanding that right now they haven't actually signed any contracts.
So…there’s probably someone rushing to get a signature?
Blue Sky: shadowfoot.bsky.social
Luxon, loose lips, I missspoke. fumble.
https://www.rnz.co.nz/news/political/588470/opposition-leader-chris-hipkins-says-us-israel-strikes-illegal
""
The Prime Minister has admitted he "misspoke" when he said New Zealand supported "any actions" to prevent Iran having nuclear weapons.
Christopher Luxon also said New Zealand will not join the conflict.
At his post-Cabinet press conference on Monday, Luxon said successive governments have had a longstanding position that any action that stopped Iran from getting a nuclear weapon, from sponsoring terrorism, and from stopping them killing their own people was "a good thing."
""
Time to watch the pump price and shipping costs I guess.
|
|
|