Is it time for another round of thread view count requests?

Forums › Geekzone › Is it time for another round of thread view count requests?

kenkeniff

563 posts

Ultimate Geek
+1 received by user: 89

Topic # 150942 8-Aug-2014 12:24

One person supports this post

Registered users at least would be nice.

"Eventual consistency" even would be ok.

Dumb increments (counts F5) would be better than nothing (seems to work for TradeMe lol).

Please.

1 | 2

6063 posts

Uber Geek
+1 received by user: 1831

Trusted

Reply # 1104823 8-Aug-2014 12:25

2 people support this post

Lol, Good old mash F5 trademe. I setup a few VM's and let them run overnight refreshing 5 times a second and lol. had close to 2 million views by the morning.

kenkeniff

563 posts

Ultimate Geek
+1 received by user: 89

Reply # 1104827 8-Aug-2014 12:33

2 people support this post

TimA: Lol, Good old mash F5 trademe. I setup a few VM's and let them run overnight refreshing 5 times a second and lol. had close to 2 million views by the morning.

Doh, that's not going to fill freitasm with confidence..

freitasm

BDFL - Memuneh
61307 posts

Uber Geek
+1 received by user: 12045

Administrator

Trusted

Geekzone

Lifetime subscriber

Reply # 1104834 8-Aug-2014 12:48

One of the reasons I removed it was for speed - less database updates, especially in very busy threads.

Not seeing it coming back yet. I am tweaking with the idea of changing something in our database to improve performance, might come back then.

Backblaze cloud backup (personal and business) | Geekzone broadband switch | Amazon (Geekzone aff) | MightyApe (Geekzone aff) |

My technology disclosure | Business Transformation | Enterprise Content Management | Customer Relationship Management

gzt

10176 posts

Uber Geek
+1 received by user: 1560

Reply # 1104837 8-Aug-2014 12:52

I have to admit being morbidly curious about the reason for removing the feature (long ago). Was it commercial sensitivity?

Edit: Posted this prior to above post arriving. I consider it answered.

freitasm

BDFL - Memuneh
61307 posts

Uber Geek
+1 received by user: 12045

Administrator

Trusted

Geekzone

Lifetime subscriber

Reply # 1104838 8-Aug-2014 12:53

Nope, purely database performance (index locks, row locks, etc).

Backblaze cloud backup (personal and business) | Geekzone broadband switch | Amazon (Geekzone aff) | MightyApe (Geekzone aff) |

My technology disclosure | Business Transformation | Enterprise Content Management | Customer Relationship Management

kenkeniff

563 posts

Ultimate Geek
+1 received by user: 89

Reply # 1104840 8-Aug-2014 12:54

freitasm: One of the reasons I removed it was for speed - less database updates, especially in very busy threads.

Not seeing it coming back yet. I am tweaking with the idea of changing something in our database to improve performance, might come back then.

Is it database I/O or specific row/table locking you're concerned about (hence the latter I suggested eventual consistency so don't need to queue up write locks on a single row/table)?

EDIT: Saw your post above. In that case eventual consistency by writing views to cache then lazily updating a main counter will solve this (the Youtube's etc do this).

freitasm

BDFL - Memuneh
61307 posts

Uber Geek
+1 received by user: 12045

Administrator

Trusted

Geekzone

Lifetime subscriber

Reply # 1104846 8-Aug-2014 13:10

Not I/O, but locking strategy. We currently have very low number of I/O interruptions because almost the entire database is in memory. Transactrion Log is the one thing that consumes I/O mostly, so not a big deal.

We did change to READ COMMITTED SNAPSHOT a while back to improve locking speed and prevent waits.

Backblaze cloud backup (personal and business) | Geekzone broadband switch | Amazon (Geekzone aff) | MightyApe (Geekzone aff) |

My technology disclosure | Business Transformation | Enterprise Content Management | Customer Relationship Management

gzt

10176 posts

Uber Geek
+1 received by user: 1560

Reply # 1104859 8-Aug-2014 13:31

freitasm: One of the reasons I removed it was for speed - less database updates, especially in very busy threads.

Would maintaining count only for registered user views be any more feasible in that regard?

freitasm

BDFL - Memuneh
61307 posts

Uber Geek
+1 received by user: 12045

Administrator

Trusted

Geekzone

Lifetime subscriber

Reply # 1104867 8-Aug-2014 13:43

Would be terrible undercounted. The number of visits from non-registered or non-logged in users is much bigger.

Backblaze cloud backup (personal and business) | Geekzone broadband switch | Amazon (Geekzone aff) | MightyApe (Geekzone aff) |

My technology disclosure | Business Transformation | Enterprise Content Management | Customer Relationship Management

kenkeniff

563 posts

Ultimate Geek
+1 received by user: 89

Reply # 1104870 8-Aug-2014 13:45

One person supports this post

freitasm: Would be terrible undercounted. The number of visits from non-registered or non-logged in users is much bigger.

Still useful though.

Thread XYZ (999 Registered Views, 0 Replies)

gzt

10176 posts

Uber Geek
+1 received by user: 1560

Reply # 1104874 8-Aug-2014 13:52

I agree, but it would give good indication of community/interest engagement. If counting the other group becomes possible that can be added also. The two figures are complementary and both give useful information.

MikeB4

13114 posts

Uber Geek
+1 received by user: 6159

Trusted

Subscriber

Reply # 1104891 8-Aug-2014 14:23

The last (big) forum I was Admin for we did away with page views as the hit on performance was such it did not justify keeping for very little benefit, we did away with it.

Mike
Retired IT Manager.
The views stated in my posts are my personal views and not that of any other organisation.

Mac user, Windows curser, Chrome OS desired.

The great divide is the lies from both sides.

kenkeniff

563 posts

Ultimate Geek
+1 received by user: 89

Reply # 1104892 8-Aug-2014 14:27

KiwiNZ: The last (big) forum I was Admin for we did away with page views as the hit on performance was such it did not justify keeping for very little benefit, we did away with it.

Cool story, neither assumption applies here

MikeB4

13114 posts

Uber Geek
+1 received by user: 6159

Trusted

Subscriber

Reply # 1104912 8-Aug-2014 14:48

kenkeniff:
KiwiNZ: The last (big) forum I was Admin for we did away with page views as the hit on performance was such it did not justify keeping for very little benefit, we did away with it.

Cool story, neither assumption applies here

It doesn't ?

Mike
Retired IT Manager.
The views stated in my posts are my personal views and not that of any other organisation.

Mac user, Windows curser, Chrome OS desired.

The great divide is the lies from both sides.

gzt

10176 posts

Uber Geek
+1 received by user: 1560

Reply # 1104923 8-Aug-2014 15:05

KiwiNZ:
kenkeniff:
KiwiNZ: The last (big) forum I was Admin for we did away with page views as the hit on performance was such it did not justify keeping for very little benefit, we did away with it.

Cool story, neither assumption applies here

It doesn't ?

It was exactly the reason freitasm removed it, so it seems a similar performance experience applies.

Please guys don't start a he said/i said and derail the thread. Just leave it there please.

1 | 2