Geekzone: technology news, blogs, forums
Guest
Welcome Guest.
You haven't logged in yet. If you don't have an account you can register now.


freitasm

BDFL - Memuneh
80646 posts

Uber Geek
+1 received by user: 41030

Administrator
ID Verified
Trusted
Geekzone
Lifetime subscriber

#265834 13-Feb-2020 13:57
Send private message

Just received:

 

 

Vodafone New Zealand has been warned by the Commerce Commission for misleading consumers about account credits. Vodafone has also been warned for representations made in a loyalty discount promotion that were likely misleading.

Despite telling customers, verbally and in emails, that it would apply certain credits to their accounts on a monthly basis, Vodafone issued invoices which did not include the agreed credits. In the Commission’s view, Vodafone likely breached the Fair Trading Act by making false representations about the price consumers were required to pay. The invoice price was higher than what the five affected customers had agreed to pay each month.

Commission Chair Anna Rawlings says in the Commission’s view Vodafone’s conduct likely breached the Fair Trading Act. 

“All businesses that offer discounts and promotions need to be paying close attention to their systems and processes to ensure customers are charged the correct amount or receive the agreed benefit. 

This investigation also highlights the importance of consumers checking receipts or invoices to ensure that they are being charged what they expect to be charged and that they receive the discounts and benefits that they expect.” 

In targeted email offers Vodafone also offered customers who were at the end, or near the end of, broadband contracts a $10 per month loyalty discount if they re-signed for a further 12-month term. 

In the Commission’s view the representations contained in the discount offer were likely to mislead customers because they created the overall impression that customers who re-signed would receive a discount off the price they were currently paying. In reality, the discount was taken off Vodafone’s standard pricing plans at the time, and by signing up, customers would lose their existing discounts. In some cases, this meant customers may have ended up paying more per month having re-signed than they would have if they had rolled over their previous contract. 

“Misleading representations about discount offers not only prevent consumers from properly assessing the total cost of the service they are signing up to, but they can also unfairly attract customers away from businesses who advertise their prices clearly and accurately,” says Ms Rawlings.

Vodafone has made changes to its systems to reduce the likelihood of consumers’ credits not being applied as represented in the future. The company has also amended promotional materials relating to its loyalty discount offer to make it clear that discounts were off Vodafone’s standard plan prices, and not off the price consumers were already paying for their plans. 


Background

 

Warning letters
A warning explains the Commerce Commission’s opinion that the conduct at issue is likely to have breached the law. Only the Courts can decide whether a breach of the law has in fact occurred.

The purpose of a warning letter is to inform the recipient of the Commission’s view that there has been a likely breach of the law, to suggest a change in the recipient’s behaviour, and to encourage future compliance with the law.

You can read a copy of the Commission’s warning letter to Vodafone on our case register

 





Referral links: Quic Broadband (free setup code: R587125ERQ6VE) | Samsung | AliExpress | Wise | Sharesies 

 

Support Geekzone by subscribing (browse ads-free), or making a one-off or recurring donation through PressPatron.

 


Create new topic
1101
3141 posts

Uber Geek
+1 received by user: 1143


  #2420946 14-Feb-2020 12:34
Send private message

Will this be one of those companies where its going to be easier (probhably cheaper) to accept CC fines, rather than truly fix all their systems :-)

 

I'd bet its not a case of deliberately being misleading , just too many departments (sales , accounts, marketing) that cant interact properly and cant make required changes to
billing.




Linux
12173 posts

Uber Geek
+1 received by user: 8469

Trusted
Lifetime subscriber

  #2420950 14-Feb-2020 12:40
Send private message

This is still happening to my parents each month they say it's fixed and following month they are charged about $10 to $20 more than the agreed price set with the retention team!

edit: Pleased to advise this months invoice is correct :)

 

 


richms
29098 posts

Uber Geek
+1 received by user: 10208

Trusted
Lifetime subscriber

  #2421014 14-Feb-2020 14:27
Send private message

The offshore guys sorted mine out fine and i'm now back to $0 bills. Im guessing it depends who you get and the staff for those offshore call centers know they will have moved on before the fallout happens from their overpromising.





Richard rich.ms



quickymart
14940 posts

Uber Geek
+1 received by user: 13953

ID Verified

  #2421227 14-Feb-2020 21:02
Send private message

That's still not really what I would call "sorted" - if the bill is $0 and your account with them is (presumably) closed, they shouldn't be sending you any invoices at all.


Handle9
11924 posts

Uber Geek
+1 received by user: 9675

Trusted
Lifetime subscriber

  #2421232 14-Feb-2020 21:09
Send private message

1101:

Will this be one of those companies where its going to be easier (probhably cheaper) to accept CC fines, rather than truly fix all their systems :-)


I'd bet its not a case of deliberately being misleading , just too many departments (sales , accounts, marketing) that cant interact properly and cant make required changes to
billing.



Vodafone's Frankenstein billing systems have been notoriously bad for many years.

knate
22 posts

Geek


  #2425551 22-Feb-2020 18:02
Send private message

This is the last 2 years of issues for me, particularly the last 4 months. I'll be adding in this to my next call, no doubt when the next bill arrives without credits applied.

 
 
 
 

Shop now for Dyson appliances (affiliate link).
Yabanize
2351 posts

Uber Geek
+1 received by user: 583


  #2425559 22-Feb-2020 18:15
Send private message

They charged us $149 I think for the "Ultra Hub" which comes free as part of the contract...

 

Had to call up about that.


quickymart
14940 posts

Uber Geek
+1 received by user: 13953

ID Verified

  #2425593 22-Feb-2020 20:47
Send private message

I've always been curious as to what percentage of their customer base has the exact same billing issue (ie, billed for services they don't have/have stopped) every month, and it seemingly never gets fixed. 1%? 5%? 10%?


K8Toledo
1018 posts

Uber Geek
+1 received by user: 311


  #2425637 22-Feb-2020 23:20
Send private message

Here we go again....they never learn.


froob
698 posts

Ultimate Geek
+1 received by user: 233

Lifetime subscriber

  #2425772 23-Feb-2020 09:54
Send private message

I had to go back to them after taking this promotion - still not convinced they charged me the right amount in the end. Currently they are charging me $10 more than agreed for my mobile account. I should really change ISP...




pipja
23 posts

Geek
+1 received by user: 5


  #2427579 26-Feb-2020 15:57
Send private message

My contract with them ends in March... Might have to change ISP for real.


Create new topic








Geekzone Live »

Try automatic live updates from Geekzone directly in your browser, without refreshing the page, with Geekzone Live now.



Are you subscribed to our RSS feed? You can download the latest headlines and summaries from our stories directly to your computer or smartphone by using a feed reader.