Films - are they getting longer or is it just me?

Forums › Off topic › Films - are they getting longer or is it just me?

Geektastic

11875 posts

Uber Geek
+1 received by user: 3852

Trusted

Lifetime subscriber

Topic # 191742 14-Feb-2016 23:12

2 people support this post

It seems to me that just about every film I have watched over the last 18 months or so has felt as though it was about 30 minutes too long. The film will be romping along nicely and all of a sudden it will go through a patch for 5 minutes where it feels as though it is crawling and just as I am about to stand up and say "Anyone fancy a pint? Only it's going on a bit..." it finds another gear and gets back to it for a while.

Maybe it's just me - although Mrs Geektastic also agreed.

1 | 2

You're typing with Josh!
1406 posts

Uber Geek
+1 received by user: 143

Trusted

Subscriber

Reply # 1492332 14-Feb-2016 23:30

ha! I feel the same pain, though I choose the right films to watch in cinema for long duration. But a mate and I watched the H8ful Eight a few weeks back and never looked at the duration before hand! and what a joy it was ! As long as the storyline is good and not weak then I can enjoy!

Geektastic

11875 posts

Uber Geek
+1 received by user: 3852

Trusted

Lifetime subscriber

Reply # 1492401 15-Feb-2016 08:49

joshhill96:

ha! I feel the same pain, though I choose the right films to watch in cinema for long duration. But a mate and I watched the H8ful Eight a few weeks back and never looked at the duration before hand! and what a joy it was ! As long as the storyline is good and not weak then I can enjoy!

Agreed - I have no problem with the film being long if it is necessary and if it works.

There does seem to be a trend just to make them long for the sake of it at the moment, almost as if directors or studios feel that it isn't a proper film if it isn't long.

Revenant just goes on way too long, for a start. Just how much footage of a man trekking across snow and ice alone is actually necessary to the plot of a man left for dead coming for revenge? It went on so long that the end was both a bit of an anti-climax and a relief at the same time.

timmmay

14138 posts

Uber Geek
+1 received by user: 2544

Trusted

Subscriber

Reply # 1492402 15-Feb-2016 08:52

2 people support this post

I prefer them long. Actually I prefer TV series, where there's time for real character and plot development. 1.5 - 2 hours isn't much time really.

AWS Certified Solution Architect Professional, Sysop Administrator Associate, and Developer Associate
TOGAF certified enterprise architect
Professional photographer

MikeB4

13072 posts

Uber Geek
+1 received by user: 6151

Trusted

Subscriber

Reply # 1492404 15-Feb-2016 08:52

They just seem longer especially Peter Jackson movies

Mike
Retired IT Manager.
The views stated in my posts are my personal views and not that of any other organisation.

Mac user, Windows curser, Chrome OS desired.

The great divide is the lies from both sides.

RUKI

1118 posts

Uber Geek
+1 received by user: 253

Reply # 1492406 15-Feb-2016 08:54

3 people support this post

No, that could be age, mate... When you are getting older - you may need to "wash you hands" more frequently, hence movies could feel being too long :-)

old3eyes

7871 posts

Uber Geek
+1 received by user: 789

Subscriber

Reply # 1492411 15-Feb-2016 09:00

joshhill96:

ha! I feel the same pain, though I choose the right films to watch in cinema for long duration. But a mate and I watched the H8ful Eight a few weeks back and never looked at the duration before hand! and what a joy it was ! As long as the storyline is good and not weak then I can enjoy!

The roadshow version that was not shown here is 20 minutes longer but it had an intermission..

Regards,

Old3eyes

Paul1977

2342 posts

Uber Geek
+1 received by user: 672

Reply # 1492416 15-Feb-2016 09:16

timmmay: 1.5 - 2 hours isn't much time really.

1.5 - 2 hours used to be the norm, but that just isn't the case for theatrically released movies any more. Aside from comedies, most studio movies are in excess of 2 hrs these days.

I watched Creed last night, and it had a running time of 133 minutes. For comparison, none of the previous 6 Rocky movies exceeded 2 hours (with the majority of them being considerably less).

Rocky 119 minutes

Rocky II 119 minutes

Rocky III 100 minutes

Rocky IV 90 minutes

Rocky V 104 minutes

Rocky Balboa 102 minutes

Batman

Mad Scientist
19004 posts

Uber Geek
+1 received by user: 2469

Trusted

Lifetime subscriber

Reply # 1492430 15-Feb-2016 09:51

Maybe we're evolving to have shorter attention span. Before the days of iPhones/iPads/Ultrabooks, I could sit in the park and absorb the scenery for hours. Now I can't even find time to watch a 30 min WRC highlights.

In the past I felt the movies were too short (90-100mins) now I feel the movies are too long because I don't have time or I need to do something.

wasabi2k

2091 posts

Uber Geek
+1 received by user: 848

Reply # 1492441 15-Feb-2016 10:00

http://www.businessinsider.com/movies-are-getting-longer-2013-1 (2013)

http://www.randalolson.com/2014/01/25/movies-arent-actually-much-longer-than-they-used-to-be/

https://www.quora.com/Whats-the-average-length-of-movies-right-now-and-is-there-a-trend-going-up-or-down-Whats-the-trendline-been-like-over-the-last-10-years-Over-the-last-100-years

In short - it depends massively on what you watch. Stupid comedies remain short. There is more appetite for long movies in some cases.

You seem to be referring more to pacing - which will vary hugely on what you watch.

sidefx

3190 posts

Uber Geek
+1 received by user: 910

Trusted

Reply # 1492442 15-Feb-2016 10:03

RUKI:

No, that could be age, mate... When you are getting older - you may need to "wash you hands" more frequently, hence movies could feel being too long :-)

Pretty much this I think. I also find as I get older by back and legs get quite uncomfortable sitting for extended periods. And other cinema goers seem put out when you stand up and stretch loudly. :-/

richms

21447 posts

Uber Geek
+1 received by user: 4353

Trusted

Subscriber

Reply # 1492444 15-Feb-2016 10:06

I have noticed my tolerance for time wasting bulls... padding has really dropped over the last few years.

Its why I cant stand 47 minute TV shows when it could have been 30, and most movies seem to have too much non action in them. I dont think it's a recent thing tho, going back and watching old movies also annoy me. Probably more so thanks to things with seek bars where I can easily skip past the drivel parts.

Richard rich.ms

Fred99

7341 posts

Uber Geek
+1 received by user: 3839

Reply # 1492486 15-Feb-2016 10:42

One person supports this post

richms:

I have noticed my tolerance for time wasting bulls... padding has really dropped over the last few years.

Its why I cant stand 47 minute TV shows when it could have been 30, and most movies seem to have too much non action in them. I dont think it's a recent thing tho, going back and watching old movies also annoy me. Probably more so thanks to things with seek bars where I can easily skip past the drivel parts.

As an older person, I'd suggest that in good old movies much of the "padding" may have been plot and character development - often sadly lacking in modern "action" movies where back to back spectacular action/special effects seem to be used to hold the viewer's attention to lack of any credible plot, and one-dimensional stereotypes instead of real characters. Not saying I don't enjoy some such movies, but Tarantino-style where it doesn't take itself too seriously and with plot lines so predictable (or at least true to form), the movies are entertaining/amusing as parodies rather than anything to be taken seriously.

Attention spans have shortened. There's also a parallel IMO with music / audio and the "loudness wars". The quote "When there is no quiet, there can be no loud" is pertinent.

Lias

3353 posts

Uber Geek
+1 received by user: 1835

Trusted

Lifetime subscriber

Reply # 1492523 15-Feb-2016 11:50

I'm just going to leave this here:

http://runpee.com/

Information wants to be free. The Net interprets censorship as damage and routes around it.

MikeAqua

5069 posts

Uber Geek
+1 received by user: 2062

Reply # 1492532 15-Feb-2016 11:56

I've been thinking a lot lately "that movie needed more editing" so I would concur with the OP.

Mike

wasabi2k

2091 posts

Uber Geek
+1 received by user: 848

Reply # 1492533 15-Feb-2016 11:56

richms:

I have noticed my tolerance for time wasting bulls... padding has really dropped over the last few years.

Its why I cant stand 47 minute TV shows when it could have been 30, and most movies seem to have too much non action in them. I dont think it's a recent thing tho, going back and watching old movies also annoy me. Probably more so thanks to things with seek bars where I can easily skip past the drivel parts.

Old bond films - good lord - they feel like they are about 3 days long.

1 | 2