Geekzone: technology news, blogs, forums
Guest
Welcome Guest.
You haven't logged in yet. If you don't have an account you can register now.




498 posts

Ultimate Geek
+1 received by user: 38

Trusted
Subscriber

Topic # 108830 6-Sep-2012 13:14
Send private message

Should I be happy with this?? or is there a better test for my connection?




View this topic in a long page with up to 500 replies per page Create new topic
 1 | 2

xpd

Runnin' and Gunnin'
8148 posts

Uber Geek
+1 received by user: 1042

Mod Emeritus
Trusted
Subscriber

  Reply # 682320 6-Sep-2012 13:34
Send private message

More info please...

What connection are you on ?
Which ISP ?
What are you pinging ?
Time of day ?
Anything else running on your network ? (Torrents etc)




XPD / @DemiseNZ / Gavin
 
Corsair Carbide SPEC-02 / Corsair VS550 / G.SKILL Ripjaws X 8GB / Zotac 760GTX AMP! / ASUS H81M-E / Intel Pentium K Anniversay G3258

 

Internet provided by : Voyager - VDSL 68/13  -  Musical Support by : Like A Storm - Visual Entertainment by : Plex and Steam and Overwatch


982 posts

Ultimate Geek
+1 received by user: 53

Trusted
Slingshot

  Reply # 682324 6-Sep-2012 13:38
Send private message

If that is to your modem....then no, this is not good :)




 
 
 
 


19282 posts

Uber Geek
+1 received by user: 2600
Inactive user


  Reply # 682344 6-Sep-2012 14:11
Send private message

Never pee into the wind!

3867 posts

Uber Geek
+1 received by user: 158


  Reply # 682351 6-Sep-2012 14:20
Send private message

OP that trace tell us so little that I expect you'll get equally useless comments back.

That's the sort of ping I get on my wifi network when someone else is pulling a chunk of data though the network at the same time, it's quite normal.





Promote New Zealand - Get yourself a .kiwi.nz domain name!!!

Check out mine - i.am.a.can.do.kiwi.nz - don@i.am.a.can.do.kiwi.nz




498 posts

Ultimate Geek
+1 received by user: 38

Trusted
Subscriber

  Reply # 682364 6-Sep-2012 14:36
Send private message

johnr: Never pee into the wind!


lol, it looks like that doesn't it - hence my question.

its a wireless link and that's the base station my radio connects to. i was about to post a comparative ping to trademe but then my connection went down.... *rolls eyes*

pinging my router from any machine on the lan is always <1ms



the reason i ask is if i do a comparative ping say from a telecom adsl connection i get this













498 posts

Ultimate Geek
+1 received by user: 38

Trusted
Subscriber

  Reply # 682380 6-Sep-2012 14:47
Send private message

here's my WAN interface - as you can see it's not up to much :)





Fully Operational
3331 posts

Uber Geek
+1 received by user: 1085

Trusted
Vocus
Subscriber

  Reply # 682384 6-Sep-2012 14:57
Send private message

You are going to need to be more specific I'd say.

What kind of wireless connection?
From whom?
Where did you get that IP from and how do you assert that it's just at the other side of your wireless link?



498 posts

Ultimate Geek
+1 received by user: 38

Trusted
Subscriber

  Reply # 682395 6-Sep-2012 15:23
Send private message

ubergeeknz: You are going to need to be more specific I'd say.

What kind of wireless connection?
From whom?
Where did you get that IP from and how do you assert that it's just at the other side of your wireless link?


5.8GHz point to multipoint,
The obfuscated IP is the gateway my router is statically configured with. The other IP is of course trademe.co.nz
I dont think the ISP's name is relevant here.

My point is not matter where I go and carryout a ping to something like trademe (who I assume will be fairly well connected and resourced) the results are always consistent as per the Telecom ping above. No matter if its wireless from compass, dsl from vodafone, telecom or clear etc and all throughout the north island. All of these connections also use similar hardware to mine (cisco routers/switches etc) and have all been configured by me. None of them jump up and down and vary so wildly as mine. I'm assuming that the problem (which I'm querying given the varying latency of the pings) lies closer to home, hence my inclusion of the first ping to my routers WAN gateway.

Here's one taken just now from a compass wireless connection in Hamilton



And another at the same time from a Vodafone DSL connection in Auckland










3867 posts

Uber Geek
+1 received by user: 158


  Reply # 682402 6-Sep-2012 15:37
Send private message

ya, post an MTR report so we can see where the issue is.

The problem could be all sorts of things.

Do you control both ends of the link?

Have you done a recent site survey to check if something else is in the 5.8 space you're using?

What channel are you actually using?

What width is the channel?

Are you using NV2? That can impact latency.

Is the router at the other end congested? Is this really a wireless problem at all?

Are there any other layer 2 devices along the way that could be causing the problem?

Is the connection dropping packets?

Are you getting CRC errors?

D




Promote New Zealand - Get yourself a .kiwi.nz domain name!!!

Check out mine - i.am.a.can.do.kiwi.nz - don@i.am.a.can.do.kiwi.nz




498 posts

Ultimate Geek
+1 received by user: 38

Trusted
Subscriber

  Reply # 682430 6-Sep-2012 16:24
Send private message

Link is provided by WISP and they control both ends.
I live rurally and there's nothing around me for about 5k's so I'd hazard a guess there no local interference. The link is about 11k but I'm told it is rock solid with good db margins.
I'm certainly not running any 5.8Ghz gear so no interference likely here.
I believe the base stations are MikroTik so maybe NV2 is being used (but isn't this supposed to improve latency with Athereos Chipsets?
This is consistent and replicable at any time of the day or night (month, year, half decade). So unless it is constantly congested, I suspect (+hope) it isn't congestion.
No packet loss or errors that I can see. WAN interface above certainly isnt showing any CRC errors.

Here's how its connected. RADIO<->871ROUTER<->3COM4924SWITCH<->WORKSTATION









3867 posts

Uber Geek
+1 received by user: 158


  Reply # 682446 6-Sep-2012 16:47
Send private message

pffft.... if you're going to keep all the info confo then it just becomes totally meaningless.

That latency is shocking for 5km.

I've got 3ms on that distance.

D




Promote New Zealand - Get yourself a .kiwi.nz domain name!!!

Check out mine - i.am.a.can.do.kiwi.nz - don@i.am.a.can.do.kiwi.nz


Fully Operational
3331 posts

Uber Geek
+1 received by user: 1085

Trusted
Vocus
Subscriber

  Reply # 682448 6-Sep-2012 16:58
Send private message

Yeah it's pretty plain that the 2nd hop there is not ideal.  Although I'm not sure what performance you can expect from a 5.8Ghz link over 11km, you would think latency would be less than 60-180ms and not so variable.

I would hazard a guess that you are getting a lot of errors at a "physical" level that are being covered up by retransmits and a large amount of interleave.  

Raise it with the supplier and let everyone know how you get on.



498 posts

Ultimate Geek
+1 received by user: 38

Trusted
Subscriber

  Reply # 682449 6-Sep-2012 16:58
Send private message

DonGould: pffft.... if you're going to keep all the info confo then it just becomes totally meaningless.

That latency is shocking for 5km.

I've got 3ms on that distance.

D


i dont know why the specifics matter much, they just show a first hop (local router), second hop gateway and then a series of other non-descript devices inbetween the source and the host.



498 posts

Ultimate Geek
+1 received by user: 38

Trusted
Subscriber

  Reply # 682453 6-Sep-2012 17:01
Send private message

ubergeeknz: Yeah it's pretty plain that the 2nd hop there is not ideal.  Although I'm not sure what performance you can expect from a 5.8Ghz link over 11km, you would think latency would be less than 60-180ms and not so variable.

I would hazard a guess that you are getting a lot of errors at a "physical" level that are being covered up by retransmits and a large amount of interleave.  

Raise it with the supplier and let everyone know how you get on.


I've done that on multiple occasions (read daily/hourly) and all I get from them is that networks are all built differently. My point is why is this network the only one that appears different

Fully Operational
3331 posts

Uber Geek
+1 received by user: 1085

Trusted
Vocus
Subscriber

  Reply # 682454 6-Sep-2012 17:03
Send private message

Cos it's either broken, or just not very performant.

If they won't accept that I suggest you take your business elsewhere...

 1 | 2
View this topic in a long page with up to 500 replies per page Create new topic



Twitter »

Follow us to receive Twitter updates when new discussions are posted in our forums:



Follow us to receive Twitter updates when news items and blogs are posted in our frontpage:



Follow us to receive Twitter updates when tech item prices are listed in our price comparison site:





News »

Fact-checking Southern Cross Next cable is fastest to USA
Posted 17-Aug-2017 13:57


Thurrott says Microsoft Surface is dead last for reliability
Posted 16-Aug-2017 15:19


LibreOffice 5.4 works better with Microsoft Office files
Posted 16-Aug-2017 13:32


Certus launches Cognition
Posted 14-Aug-2017 09:31


Spark adds Cambridge, Turangi to 4.5G network
Posted 10-Aug-2017 17:55


REANNZ network to receive ongoing Government funding through to 2024
Posted 10-Aug-2017 16:05


Chorus backhaul starts with 2degrees
Posted 10-Aug-2017 15:49


New Zealanders cool on data analytics catching benefit fraud
Posted 10-Aug-2017 09:56


New Zealanders wary of wearable biometrics: Unisys
Posted 9-Aug-2017 09:39


Unisys Security Index 2017: How New Zealand compares
Posted 8-Aug-2017 15:05


Chorus to provide national backhaul to 2degrees
Posted 8-Aug-2017 11:26


D-Link releases next generation managed gigabit switches
Posted 8-Aug-2017 11:24


How Microsoft killed Windows Phone
Posted 7-Aug-2017 18:39


Protecting the 12.9-inch iPad Pro: Covers, sleeves
Posted 7-Aug-2017 12:14


Why New Zealand outplayed Australia on the NBN
Posted 6-Aug-2017 18:09



Geekzone Live »

Try automatic live updates from Geekzone directly in your browser, without refreshing the page, with Geekzone Live now.



Are you subscribed to our RSS feed? You can download the latest headlines and summaries from our stories directly to your computer or smartphone by using a feed reader.

Alternatively, you can receive a daily email with Geekzone updates.