![]() ![]() ![]() |
|
sbiddle: My pick is that the leeches aren't going to have the impact some people may think. Why? Because they're only interested in paying the cheapest possible price for their connection so will be with Slingshot or Bigpipe.
"I was born not knowing and have had only a little time to change that here and there." | Octopus Energy | Sharesies
- Richard Feynman
solaybro: If the network does get too many people downloading how quick can Snap do something about it? Can they do anything about it?
#include <std_disclaimer>
Any comments made are personal opinion and do not reflect directly on the position my current or past employers may have.
solaybro: Looks good, more expensive than Telecom but I imagine you will get a better service. Sucks I wont be able to sign up for at least a month and a half since I'm too busy to get the install done.
Professional Forum Lurker
Common sense is not as common as you think.
sbiddle: My pick is that the leeches aren't going to have the impact some people may think. Why? Because they're only interested in paying the cheapest possible price for their connection so will be with Slingshot or Bigpipe.
NonprayingMantis:sbiddle: My pick is that the leeches aren't going to have the impact some people may think. Why? Because they're only interested in paying the cheapest possible price for their connection so will be with Slingshot or Bigpipe.
Maybe. But on the other hand the leeches want to max their line 24/7 at maximum bandwidth with torrents and snap is the only ISP to have (and actively promote) no traffic management of any kind so I wouldn't be surprised if the leeches flock to snap now, even if it is a few bucks more.
It won't take very many people maxing out their 100Mbps ufb line to smoke snaps international capacity.
NonprayingMantis:sbiddle: My pick is that the leeches aren't going to have the impact some people may think. Why? Because they're only interested in paying the cheapest possible price for their connection so will be with Slingshot or Bigpipe.
Maybe. But on the other hand the leeches want to max their line 24/7 at maximum bandwidth with torrents and snap is the only ISP to have (and actively promote) no traffic management of any kind so I wouldn't be surprised if the leeches flock to snap now, even if it is a few bucks more.
It won't take very many people maxing out their 100Mbps ufb line to smoke snaps international capacity.
eXDee:NonprayingMantis:sbiddle: My pick is that the leeches aren't going to have the impact some people may think. Why? Because they're only interested in paying the cheapest possible price for their connection so will be with Slingshot or Bigpipe.
Maybe. But on the other hand the leeches want to max their line 24/7 at maximum bandwidth with torrents and snap is the only ISP to have (and actively promote) no traffic management of any kind so I wouldn't be surprised if the leeches flock to snap now, even if it is a few bucks more.
It won't take very many people maxing out their 100Mbps ufb line to smoke snaps international capacity.
Doesn't orcon promote this, since the Comcom decision on their advertising?
chevrolux: Dam it Snap!! Why did you have to follow with this trend?!
America has finally figured out uncapped data isn't the way to go and are putting caps on, seems we are going the other way.
You already had unlimited nights so people with more than half a brain could use uTorrent Scheduler (or whatever torrent client they may use) to time downloads over night. And just about every cloud storage system (good ones anyway) have the ability to time uploads/downloads.
The way I see it is Telecom NZ can afford to have unlimited customers because they have loads and loads and loads (and loads) of bandwidth/resource. Can Snap really offer the same sort of service? Hopefully the butt loving leechers have already shifted to BlockedPipe so they won't affect us at peak times because they are probably the stupid ones that didn't get how unlimited nights worked.
|
![]() ![]() ![]() |