![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
|
Oh he was just asking questions about "how voting works". How many minutes has he been a politician for again? Come on, Lindsay - is that the best defense you can come up with? Please.
Also, wait, what? Trump said this? https://www.axios.com/2022/08/15/trump-fbi-search-warrant-mar-a-lago
quickymart: Also, wait, what? Trump said this? ...
Trump: "Temperature has to be brought down" after Mar-a-Lago search
(note the unusual architecture)
Sideface
Excellent read that helps explain why some people fall for Trump's brainwashing bullshit.
https://www.cosmopolitan.com/lifestyle/a37696261/leaving-recovering-from-q-anon/
THOUSANDS OF PEOPLE ARE TRYING TO LEAVE Q-ANON, BUT GETTING OUT IS ALMOST IMPOSSIBLE
In a Cosmo exclusive, women on both sides—the former believers and
the doctors they’re turning to—show what it takes to escape.
'Those who can make you believe absurdities can make you commit atrocities.' Voltaire
'A patriot must always be ready to defend his country against his government.' Edward Abbey
The NY Times - Trump Executive Nears Plea Deal With Manhattan Prosecutors
breaking
A senior executive at Donald J. Trump’s family business who was charged with participating in a years-long tax scheme is nearing a deal with Manhattan prosecutors but will not cooperate with a broader investigation into Mr. Trump ...
If it becomes final, a plea deal for the executive, Allen H. Weisselberg, would bring prosecutors no closer to indicting the former president but would nonetheless brand one of his most trusted lieutenants a felon. ...
The judge scheduled a hearing for Thursday, a possible indication that a deal has been reached and a plea could be entered then.
While Mr. Weisselberg, 75, is facing financial penalties as well as up to 15 years in prison if convicted by a jury, a plea deal would avoid a high-profile trial and spare him a lengthy sentence. ...
Weisselberg was probably the Trump family's most loyal and trusted employee for almost 50 years.
Sideface
This is pretty sad, how Trump (in part - other part conspiracy theories) ruined a marriage, but I imagine this most definitely isn't an isolated case:
I could personally never, ever be with a woman who was an antivaxxer, or somehow thought Trump was a "good" president.
This is pretty worrying too, if he (somehow) gets in again: https://www.stuff.co.nz/world/us-canada/300663463/the-drastic-plans-donald-trump-is-already-promising-for-a-second-term-as-president
quickymart:
This is pretty worrying too, if he (somehow) gets in again: https://www.stuff.co.nz/world/us-canada/300663463/the-drastic-plans-donald-trump-is-already-promising-for-a-second-term-as-president
I can see civil war and a separation of Trump's USA and California/most of the West Coast happening.
A large border going up on the West of the country to keep out the crazies, like a zombie apocalypse movie would be not too absurd or out of the realms of possibility, I feel.
It's almost Orwellian.
Handsome Dan Has Spoken.
Handsome Dan needs to stop adding three dots to every sentence...
Handsome Dan does not currently have a side hustle as the mascot for Yale
*Gladly accepting donations...
The Washington Post - Liz Cheney projected to lose to Trump-backed Hageman in Wyoming
breaking
JACKSON, Wyo. - Rep. Liz Cheney - the once-high-ranking Republican who defied her party to wage a lonely crusade against former president Donald Trump - lost her primary Tuesday after vowing that whatever the outcome, the race was “the beginning of the battle” for the future of American democracy.
Harriet Hageman, a lawyer with Trump’s endorsement, ousted Cheney, clinching the GOP nomination for deep-red Wyoming’s only House seat. ...
Cheney is the fourth House Republican to lose a primary after voting to impeach Trump last year, on charges that he incited a riot.
The others are Reps. Tom Rice of South Carolina, Peter Meijer of Michigan and Jaime Herrera Beutler of Washington. ...
and ...
The NY Times - Liz Cheney, Trump’s Chief Antagonist, Loses in a Landslide
Sad, but not a surprise result.
Sideface
ALASKAN ELECTION REVEALS MARJORIE TAYLOR GREENE’S STATUS AS MOST IGNORANT PERSON IN CONGRESS IS UNDER THREAT.
WASHINGTON (The Borowitz Report)—Rep. Marjorie Taylor Greene’s status as Congress’s most ignorant member is at stake in Alaska’s special election, Greene’s aides have acknowledged.
Greene, who has fended off challenges to her crown of dimness from such formidable contenders as Lauren Boebert and Rand Paul, will face her stiffest test to date when Alaskans go to the polls.
An aide to Greene, Harland Dorrinson, said that the congresswoman will be watching the returns from Alaska “nervously.”
“Ignorance is Margie’s brand,” he said. “Obviously, she’s concerned about anything that could jeopardize that.”
In a sign that she does not intend to relinquish her title without a fight, Greene took to the floor of the House of Representatives and accused President Biden of possessing nuclear codes.
'Those who can make you believe absurdities can make you commit atrocities.' Voltaire
'A patriot must always be ready to defend his country against his government.' Edward Abbey
Sideface:
The Washington Post - Liz Cheney projected to lose to Trump-backed Hageman in Wyoming
breaking
JACKSON, Wyo. - Rep. Liz Cheney - the once-high-ranking Republican who defied her party to wage a lonely crusade against former president Donald Trump - lost her primary Tuesday after vowing that whatever the outcome, the race was “the beginning of the battle” for the future of American democracy.
Harriet Hageman, a lawyer with Trump’s endorsement, ousted Cheney, clinching the GOP nomination for deep-red Wyoming’s only House seat. ...
Cheney is the fourth House Republican to lose a primary after voting to impeach Trump last year, on charges that he incited a riot.
The others are Reps. Tom Rice of South Carolina, Peter Meijer of Michigan and Jaime Herrera Beutler of Washington. ...
Sad, but not a surprise result.
That's a pity 😞 her politics are quite different to mine, but I have to commend her for standing up for the right thing (the Constitution, not the wishes of one man). I'm sure she knew this might happen though.
All these Trumpers must be quite smugly pleased with themselves right now, but the day will come when the orange buffoon is no longer around I get the feeling they won't know what to do with themselves.
quickymart:
That's a pity 😞 her politics are quite different to mine, but I have to commend her for standing up for the right thing (the Constitution, not the wishes of one man). I'm sure she knew this might happen though.
All these Trumpers must be quite smugly pleased with themselves right now, but the day will come when the orange buffoon is no longer around I get the feeling they won't know what to do with themselves.
Trump is not the last of his kind. Ron De Santis (R. Gov FL) would be a candidate to take up Trump's mantle, as well as Greg Abbott (R. Gov TX) - both of whom are as conservative as they come, as self-serving as they come, and as malicious as they come.
https://uproxx.com/viral/trump-struggling-find-lawyers-fbi-investigation/
I bet he is! Good luck to any lawyer who decides to represent him - also, don't expect to get paid for any work you do for him. Ever.
quickymart:This is pretty worrying too, if he (somehow) gets in again: https://www.stuff.co.nz/world/us-canada/300663463/the-drastic-plans-donald-trump-is-already-promising-for-a-second-term-as-president
He's using the chapter on subverting democracy from the book "How Democracies Die". First step is to remove the checks and balances, of which the US had two. One is already gone, the Electoral College. Alongside its better-known role of ensuring that states with large populations don't drown out states with small ones, it also ensured that only sound candidates got in because they chose them. After the disaster of the 1968 Democratic Convention this was changed to allow candidates to be selected by popular vote in the primaries. The Democrats fixed this in the 1980s which is why Hillary got in no matter what the popular vote actually said. The Republicans didn't, which is why Trump got in no matter what the party actually wanted.
The second check is the judiciary. Trump has already packed the Supreme Court with conservatives, but for a full autocracy he needs his loyalists in there, not just general conservatives. To do this, he needs to follow the playbook from pretty much every south American country that turned itself into a dictatorship or banana republic. A lot of those adopted the US Constitution, in some cases verbatim, as their own national constitutions, when they gained independence. What autocratic leaders did to get around the courts is either to impeach sitting judges and replace them with loyalists, or stack the court with loyalists and push out the actual judges.
Once the checks and balances are gone, you perform a law-and-order crackdown on anyone you don't like, control the media, and follow the usual playbook for an autocracy.
I'm not aware of anything in the US that can stop this. No-one's ever tried it before, but that's not because it's not possible, just because it's not a done thing. Now that any demagogue outsider who doesn't care about what's proper and what isn't can get in, there's nothing there to stop them continuing on.
|
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |