networkn:
Long before it was raised by National, the way the messaging changed to mask-wearing, the warnings of a second wave and the entire focus toward preparing for a second wave seemed "off" to me after 100 days of no community transmission. Out and about with clients in that time, it was mentioned or discussed by them all more or less asking the same questions or drawing the conclusions. We also started getting significant increases in calls to ensure remote access was working etc.. I don't think you have to be a nutter to at least *wonder* if they knew of something to indicate the additional warnings that went out all of a sudden. If it's all a coincidence then at least the Government is on record of saying so.
If you look for ghosts you will see them everywhere,
Imagine if there was no warnings about mask wearing (which is based on updated information from WHO as I understand it), no warning of a second wave, no suggestions to stay prepared.
We would be sitting here saying "they should have warned us, they should have been ready".
Which track would you prefer our officials to take?
In hindsight, I think being told to use the downtime to get prepared was a smart move. Actually quite obvious when you take a look how may other countries experienced second waves.
I don't think NZ has a great track record of successful deep state conspiracies - and if this is one I'm sure someone will start blabbing by the weekend.


