Geekzone: technology news, blogs, forums
Guest
Welcome Guest.
You haven't logged in yet. If you don't have an account you can register now.


View this topic in a long page with up to 500 replies per page Create new topic
1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 | 7 | 8 | 9 | 10 | ... | 54
Batman
Mad Scientist
30014 posts

Uber Geek
+1 received by user: 6217

Trusted
Lifetime subscriber

  #1005589 14-Mar-2014 13:43
Send private message

Oxygen percentage remains the same at 21%

The partial pressure drops which should be picked up by decompression alarm



pbgben
261 posts

Ultimate Geek
+1 received by user: 48


  #1005596 14-Mar-2014 13:53
Send private message

I've been doing some research into the systems on a commercial aircraft. It seams that the communication system would have to take a direct hit in order for it not to report issues that would arise from destruction.

If there was decompression then ACARS should communicate that to the ground team. also, the engines would likely report a power/fuel related issue. We know that ACARS was working because Rolls-Royce we're getting the "Pings" to show it was online.

Another fact is that its been a week since the indecent and no reports of debris washing up on the coast or seen in the water.

Which leads me onto a Hijacking, We know that their were two passengers on that plane with false passports, and we know that it changed course (WEST) before going offline.

Question is, why would they hijack the plane?




Geektastic
18012 posts

Uber Geek
+1 received by user: 8470

Trusted
Lifetime subscriber

  #1005630 14-Mar-2014 14:33
Send private message

pbgben: I've been doing some research into the systems on a commercial aircraft. It seams that the communication system would have to take a direct hit in order for it not to report issues that would arise from destruction.

If there was decompression then ACARS should communicate that to the ground team. also, the engines would likely report a power/fuel related issue. We know that ACARS was working because Rolls-Royce we're getting the "Pings" to show it was online.

Another fact is that its been a week since the indecent and no reports of debris washing up on the coast or seen in the water.

Which leads me onto a Hijacking, We know that their were two passengers on that plane with false passports, and we know that it changed course (WEST) before going offline.

Question is, why would they hijack the plane?


Another question would be why do planes have transponders that can be turned off by the flight crew at all?

EG if there was one in an inaccessible place (inaccessible during flight I mean) surely that would be sensible? Just in case?







frankv
5705 posts

Uber Geek
+1 received by user: 3666

Lifetime subscriber

  #1005694 14-Mar-2014 15:54
Send private message

pbgben: Flight path before it dropping connection.
Notice that the next day there is a similar connection drop around the same location? Which reconnects just before making land.


http://www.flightradar24.com/data/flights/mh370/#2d81a27 


Interesting that at the last minute of the recording, it changes track from 28degrees to 40degrees. Weather avoidance?

pbgben
261 posts

Ultimate Geek
+1 received by user: 48


  #1005709 14-Mar-2014 16:02
Send private message

frankv:
pbgben: Flight path before it dropping connection.
Notice that the next day there is a similar connection drop around the same location? Which reconnects just before making land.


http://www.flightradar24.com/data/flights/mh370/#2d81a27 


Interesting that at the last minute of the recording, it changes track from 28degrees to 40degrees. Weather avoidance?


No, there is a slight course change east. If you look at recent history you can see they turn slightly.




frankv
5705 posts

Uber Geek
+1 received by user: 3666

Lifetime subscriber

  #1005719 14-Mar-2014 16:11
Send private message



Another question would be why do planes have transponders that can be turned off by the flight crew at all?

EG if there was one in an inaccessible place (inaccessible during flight I mean) surely that would be sensible? Just in case?


If the transponder was faulty e.g. a short-circuit, or continuous transmission, you would want to be able to turn it off.

http://911blogger.com/news/2011-12-29/implications-september-11-flight-transponder-signal-losses has an interesting comment... "Perhaps the most significant consequence of lost September 11 flight [transponder] data to ATC was a circumstantial impression of accused hijacker flight deck takeovers."


 
 
 
 

Shop now for Lego sets and other gifts (affiliate link).
turnin
509 posts

Ultimate Geek
+1 received by user: 155
Inactive user


  #1005740 14-Mar-2014 16:53
Send private message

agree there can't be any good reason in the world that a transponder should stop transmitting on a commercial airline. I would have thought there would be at least two transponders per plane.

The Malaysians deny the US media claims that the engines were run for up to 4 hours after 1.07 AM, the Malaysians state that the representatives from Boeing and Rolls Royce are working with them in Malasia and the last data sent was at 1.07
If Micke McKay, the Kiwi on the oil rig, ( who does not appear to have provided the time of his observation) saw something burning, and then extinguish itsself what could account for that?
I guess fires could "blow out" with enough speed but an engine fire alone would not knock out a transponder in the tail.


Sideface
9654 posts

Uber Geek
+1 received by user: 15614

Trusted
DR
Lifetime subscriber

  #1005767 14-Mar-2014 17:34
Send private message

...If Micke McKay, the Kiwi on the oil rig, ( who does not appear to have provided the time of his observation) saw something burning, and then extinguish itsself what could account for that? ...

A meteorite fall (fireball) ?




Sideface


Technofreak
6657 posts

Uber Geek
+1 received by user: 3477

Trusted

  #1005777 14-Mar-2014 18:03
Send private message

Geektastic:
geocom:
joker97: question is - in a detonation and no debris whatsoever?

if that is possible then that's probably what it was.

if that is not possible then the everybody unconcious and the plane flew on autopilot until it ran out of fuel ... does anyone know where the autopilot would take them? presumably not onto land as someone would have seen it on their radar if it flew unresponsive to beijeng


Believe it or not this sort of thing has happened Lookup Helios Airways Flight 522
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Helios_Airways_Flight_522
 




After that one, I have no idea why compulsory low oxygen alarms were not mandated for all commercial planes....


They do, if you read the wiki article you'll see that aircraft had an operative system installed, the alarm was misidentified by the crew, don't ask me how but they did.




Sony Xperia XA2 running Sailfish OS. https://sailfishos.org The true independent open source mobile OS 
Samsung Galaxy Tab S6
Dell Inspiron 14z i5


blakamin
4431 posts

Uber Geek
+1 received by user: 1306
Inactive user


  #1005778 14-Mar-2014 18:04
Send private message

The ones saying it flew on for up to 5 hours are US media citing "unnamed US officials".
Malaysians say it was transmitting no data to Boeing or RR and it was last heard from at 1.07.

News.com.au debunking the myths
And another page that's being constantly updated.


Sideface:
...If Micke McKay, the Kiwi on the oil rig, ( who does not appear to have provided the time of his observation) saw something burning, and then extinguish itsself what could account for that? ...

A meteorite fall (fireball) ?


I'd imagine a seasoned rig worker would've seen plenty of meteorites and would know if that's what he saw.
A mate of mine in the early 90's worked on rigs and became a bit of an expert on night skies... and sliding forklifts on a wet steel deck. :D



It's certainly a mystery ATM.

Technofreak
6657 posts

Uber Geek
+1 received by user: 3477

Trusted

  #1005780 14-Mar-2014 18:13
Send private message

Geektastic:
Another question would be why do planes have transponders that can be turned off by the flight crew at all?



Because there are times when the transponder needs to be turned off by the crew, for example sometimes when taxying.




Sony Xperia XA2 running Sailfish OS. https://sailfishos.org The true independent open source mobile OS 
Samsung Galaxy Tab S6
Dell Inspiron 14z i5


 
 
 

Stream your favourite shows now on Apple TV (affiliate link).
pbgben
261 posts

Ultimate Geek
+1 received by user: 48


  #1005802 14-Mar-2014 18:51
Send private message

Where was this oil rig? Jet engines "Flame Out"/"Burn Out" when they run out of fuel... so the flames he could have seen may have been it run out of fuel... or an explosion :/




Batman
Mad Scientist
30014 posts

Uber Geek
+1 received by user: 6217

Trusted
Lifetime subscriber

  #1005808 14-Mar-2014 19:01
Send private message

look at the moment the plane could be in any corner of the galaxy. people see things all the time. at 70kms away (what the oil rig guy said) I wouldn't be able to tell venus from a satellite

Technofreak
6657 posts

Uber Geek
+1 received by user: 3477

Trusted

  #1005819 14-Mar-2014 19:18
Send private message

pbgben: Where was this oil rig? Jet engines "Flame Out"/"Burn Out" when they run out of fuel... so the flames he could have seen may have been it run out of fuel... or an explosion :/


You're misunderstanding the term "flame out".  In a jet engine the "Fire" or combustion is continuous unlike a piston engine which has a new fire each time the spark plug ignites the mixture in the cylinder.

When a jet (turbine) engine stops the flame goes out so to speak, hence the term flame out.  There is no burst of flame out of the exhaust area.




Sony Xperia XA2 running Sailfish OS. https://sailfishos.org The true independent open source mobile OS 
Samsung Galaxy Tab S6
Dell Inspiron 14z i5


pbgben
261 posts

Ultimate Geek
+1 received by user: 48


  #1005821 14-Mar-2014 19:20
Send private message

Technofreak:
pbgben: Where was this oil rig? Jet engines "Flame Out"/"Burn Out" when they run out of fuel... so the flames he could have seen may have been it run out of fuel... or an explosion :/


You're misunderstanding the term "flame out".  In a jet engine the "Fire" or combustion is continuous unlike a piston engine which has a new fire each time the spark plug ignites the mixture in the cylinder.

When a jet (turbine) engine stops the flame goes out so to speak, hence the term flame out.  There is no burst of flame out of the exhaust area.


Ah, my mistake. That would make more sense :) 




1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 | 7 | 8 | 9 | 10 | ... | 54
View this topic in a long page with up to 500 replies per page Create new topic








Geekzone Live »

Try automatic live updates from Geekzone directly in your browser, without refreshing the page, with Geekzone Live now.



Are you subscribed to our RSS feed? You can download the latest headlines and summaries from our stories directly to your computer or smartphone by using a feed reader.