Geekzone: technology news, blogs, forums
Guest
Welcome Guest.
You haven't logged in yet. If you don't have an account you can register now.
To post in this sub-forum you must have made 100 posts or have Trust status or have completed our ID Verification



Rikkitic

Awrrr
19063 posts

Uber Geek
+1 received by user: 16302

Lifetime subscriber

#242543 2-Nov-2018 17:34
Send private message

David Seymour has finally found a cause to grab the headlines and remind people that ACT really does have a purpose.

 

According to an item on RNZ, Seymour has learned that banning plastic bags may kill up to 20 New Zealanders a year due to food poisoning! He bases this on a rough calculation of chicken-eating San Franciscans who reputedly did themselves in from contaminated reusable bags. 

 

In the brave spirit of such ACT traditions as condoning incest and possibly the Conservative one of believing in chemtrails, Seymour suggests that single use plastic bags are not a pollution problem in this country at all. Rather, it is the fault of all those careless Africans and Asians and banning bags here simply cannot be justified due to the health consequences.

 

He does not say what the health consequences are of people putting those bags over their heads. Perhaps he would like to investigate that risk as well, just to see if it justifies the level of inconvenience and potential public health danger that might arise from allowing the continued presence of such bags on the streets and in the trees and in the oceans and practically everywhere else the wind blows.

 

 

 

 





Plesse igmore amd axxept applogies in adbance fir anu typos

 


 


Create new topic

This is a filtered page: currently showing replies marked as answers. Click here to see full discussion.

Rikkitic

Awrrr
19063 posts

Uber Geek
+1 received by user: 16302

Lifetime subscriber

  #2119276 3-Nov-2018 21:03
Send private message

Here is a more balanced assessment from TV1 news. I also checked the San Francisco research. As is often the case with this kind of thing, there is some theoretical basis for Seymour's claim, but the 'evidence' he cites does not stand up to scrutiny. Like Judith Collins, he seems to be reacting to a catchy headline without bothering to actually check its validity.

 

There is no proof that any increased food poisoning deaths have occurred in San Francisco or anywhere else as a result of a plastic bag ban. No credible research has been done on this. The connection made by Seymour and others simply has not been established. At the same time, it is not inconceivable that contamination could occur and it is not a bad idea to wipe or wash reusable bags from time to time. But Seymour is making a mountain out of a pile of mashed potatoes and blowing smoke out his backside. He will need to come up with something better than this if he wants to escape obscurity.

 

 





Plesse igmore amd axxept applogies in adbance fir anu typos

 


 


Create new topic








Geekzone Live »

Try automatic live updates from Geekzone directly in your browser, without refreshing the page, with Geekzone Live now.



Are you subscribed to our RSS feed? You can download the latest headlines and summaries from our stories directly to your computer or smartphone by using a feed reader.