![]() ![]() ![]() |
|
networkn: THIS is news:
http://www.stuff.co.nz/national/crime/10446236/Two-dead-in-Work-and-Income-shooting
mattwnz: I think some of the oppositions chances of getting in, are based on keeping this dirty politics thing going. So expect to see opposition parties trying to keep it going. The problem with policies that opposition parties are releasing , is that they lack any detail, and in fact they even say they won't nut out the details until they are in power. I don't see how you can vote for a party based on that. The capital gains tax is a case in point, there are no real details about it, and NZ does already have a capital gains tax, for the reasons why the opposition parties say it is needed. The problem is policing it which is costly.
dickytim:
I have to laugh at Labour's TV add, " I want to work less", "I want more free time"
We all want that but how does it all get paid for? Tax those filthy scum bags on better that $100,00o a year? I really want to see some actual policies, not just trying to engage the lowest common denominator.
networkn: THIS is news:
http://www.stuff.co.nz/national/crime/10446236/Two-dead-in-Work-and-Income-shooting
We all want that but how does it all get paid for? Tax those filthy scum bags on better that $100,00o a year? I really want to see some actual policies, not just trying to engage the lowest common denominator.
The whole dirty politics thing is really pissing me off. We need to see some actual policies, but I don't think we will this election.
networkn: THIS is news: http://www.stuff.co.nz/national/crime/10446236/Two-dead-in-Work-and-Income-shooting
trig42: Sad news at that. How awful.
DravidDavid: That is crazy! Can't say I didn't see it coming. I'm probably going on a watch list for this, but the Three Kings branch is probably next. Some violent stuff has gone down in and around that one!
KiwiNZ: My thoughts are with the staff and families. I am absolutely shocked and deeply saddened. Kia Kaha my friends.
mattwnz: In a way I am surprised that elections are able to be allowed to be rerailed like this. No one is talking about policies, which is what opposition parties want.
BarTender:networkn: THIS is news:
http://www.stuff.co.nz/national/crime/10446236/Two-dead-in-Work-and-Income-shooting
As is this: http://www.nzherald.co.nz/nz/news/article.cfm?c_id=1&objectid=11317385
networkn:BarTender:networkn: THIS is news:
http://www.stuff.co.nz/national/crime/10446236/Two-dead-in-Work-and-Income-shooting
As is this: http://www.nzherald.co.nz/nz/news/article.cfm?c_id=1&objectid=11317385
*Maybe* when it's verified.
You and I clearly have a disconnect over what we consider real news to be though.
BarTender:networkn:BarTender:networkn: THIS is news:
http://www.stuff.co.nz/national/crime/10446236/Two-dead-in-Work-and-Income-shooting
As is this: http://www.nzherald.co.nz/nz/news/article.cfm?c_id=1&objectid=11317385
*Maybe* when it's verified.
You and I clearly have a disconnect over what we consider real news to be though.
I agree the terrible events that occurred at WINZ is news. I wish you could stay on topic and give me the courtesy to consider that perhaps the above link refers to the actual topic of Collins resigning and not trying to divert the whole thread to something else?
It leads to the whole root of all the rot.
I refer back to the speed at which Collins denied that she was talking with Winston Peters (it was mere hours) vs the denial of any of the allegations with her working with Slater (which she so far hasn't denied).
Doesn't the lack of denial speak volumes? Start at about 4Mins 40... Since it does with me.
networkn: Yes you have mentioned multiple times that you consider a lack of a denial, to be guilt. Myself and a few others have repeatedly said we consider actual proof, to be proof, and that a lack of a denial is nothing more than that.
At the end of the day she might be guilty, and due process will confirm that or clear her, but even if it finds her guilty, there are just so many more important things going on in the grand scheme of things that should be higher priority and deserve more attention. You disagree. I understand.
Not really sure what else can be said ?
BarTender:networkn: Yes you have mentioned multiple times that you consider a lack of a denial, to be guilt. Myself and a few others have repeatedly said we consider actual proof, to be proof, and that a lack of a denial is nothing more than that.
At the end of the day she might be guilty, and due process will confirm that or clear her, but even if it finds her guilty, there are just so many more important things going on in the grand scheme of things that should be higher priority and deserve more attention. You disagree. I understand.
Not really sure what else can be said ?
My majn point is this thread is talking about Judith Collins resigning. You preferred to divert and somehow say that the horrific news that occurred in WINZ is somehow related to this thread. Whi j it isn't. Feel free to start up a new thread about it and I would most probably agree with you it's terrible news.
I'm trying to stay on topic and include recent information that is on topic. Plus continue to say that Judith Collins has a very good history of denial when it comes most other things such as Winson Peters.... yet not denied anything has has admitted she passed on the employees title to Slater who then did receive death threats. This was while she was saying tough words on cyber bullying.
Please do listen to the interview. It's quite enlightening.
I do agree in the rule of law and innocent before guilty. But one would assume that you would claim innocence to assert that.
|
![]() ![]() ![]() |