Geekzone: technology news, blogs, forums
Guest
Welcome Guest.
You haven't logged in yet. If you don't have an account you can register now.


nickb99

128 posts

Master Geek


#111816 15-Nov-2012 18:47
Send private message

As part of a uni project I am suggesting that our client set up a discussion forum like Geekzone for their community. Is there any specific law that protects commercial/not for profit forum owners here? Have there been any known problems...? Are they legally responsible for the posts of their community?
Any information and advice appreciated.

View this topic in a long page with up to 500 replies per page Create new topic

This is a filtered page: currently showing replies marked as answers. Click here to see full discussion.

muso
28 posts

Geek


  #718491 16-Nov-2012 20:51
Send private message

That is not my understanding.

(Disclaimer: What follows are general comments only - please do not rely on them as a substitute for legal advice. For all you know I am making this up.)

A publisher that has no knowledge (and can't fairly be said to ought to know) that defamatory material has been posted is not liable. It's the same reasoning that gives ISP a way out. Where a person moderates comments before they are posted, then the inference that they ought to know is easier to make (although, I would argue, not guaranteed). 

From that case:

 But it seems to me that there must be some action that amounts to a promotion of, or ratification of, the continuing presence of the defamatory material on the website.

The issue in the instant case is whether it can be said that the first defendant knew about the material on the website, occupied such a position vis a vis the website that it could have prevented the continued publication of the material and, by its inaction, associated itself with the publication in such a way that it apparently adopted or ratified the publication in the strict sense. 


It follows that a site that reviews all comments before posting takes significantly more risk. There is still risk for sites that don't review comments, and as far as I know the point hasn't been finally decided. But I would take the above as starting authority for the proposition that an owner of an unmoderated board, where the owner or operator has been given no notice of any allegedly defamatory material (and wouldn't otherwise be expected to know) is not liable for defamation.

View this topic in a long page with up to 500 replies per page Create new topic





News and reviews »

Gen Threat Report Reveals Rise in Crypto, Sextortion and Tech Support Scams
Posted 7-Aug-2025 13:09


Logitech G and McLaren Racing Sign New, Expanded Multi-Year Partnership
Posted 7-Aug-2025 13:00


A Third of New Zealanders Fall for Online Scams Says Trend Micro
Posted 7-Aug-2025 12:43


OPPO Releases Its Most Stylish and Compact Smartwatch Yet, the Watch X2 Mini.
Posted 7-Aug-2025 12:37


Epson Launches New High-End EH-LS9000B Home Theatre Laser Projector
Posted 7-Aug-2025 12:34


Air New Zealand Starts AI adoption with OpenAI
Posted 24-Jul-2025 16:00


eero Pro 7 Review
Posted 23-Jul-2025 12:07


BeeStation Plus Review
Posted 21-Jul-2025 14:21


eero Unveils New Wi-Fi 7 Products in New Zealand
Posted 21-Jul-2025 00:01


WiZ Introduces HDMI Sync Box and other Light Devices
Posted 20-Jul-2025 17:32


RedShield Enhances DDoS and Bot Attack Protection
Posted 20-Jul-2025 17:26


Seagate Ships 30TB Drives
Posted 17-Jul-2025 11:24


Oclean AirPump A10 Water Flosser Review
Posted 13-Jul-2025 11:05


Samsung Galaxy Z Fold7: Raising the Bar for Smartphones
Posted 10-Jul-2025 02:01


Samsung Galaxy Z Flip7 Brings New Edge-To-Edge FlexWindow
Posted 10-Jul-2025 02:01



Geekzone Live »

Try automatic live updates from Geekzone directly in your browser, without refreshing the page, with Geekzone Live now.



Are you subscribed to our RSS feed? You can download the latest headlines and summaries from our stories directly to your computer or smartphone by using a feed reader.