Geekzone: technology news, blogs, forums
Guest
Welcome Guest.
You haven't logged in yet. If you don't have an account you can register now.


AMAC

7 posts

Wannabe Geek


#319280 9-Apr-2025 11:42
Send private message

Having worked in Medical Electronics (in the late seventys) the pacemakers of that time were interrogated by holding a magnet over the pacemaker. Also in the case of interferance the device would revert to a fixed rate.

 

I am interested because some retirement villages are averse to install inductive cooking appliances. There are considerable advantages for the elderly using these appliances some of the advantages are safety.

 

Our new cook top advises that a pacemaker should be 100mm or more from an inductive device, which for most people would not be difficuilt. What do you all think ?


Filter this topic showing only the reply marked as answer Create new topic
mkissin
402 posts

Ultimate Geek
+1 received by user: 391

ID Verified
Lifetime subscriber

  #3362280 9-Apr-2025 12:32
Send private message

There are standards that cover exposure of implantable medical devices to magnetic fields, and it's very complicated. You'd be wanting ANSI/AAMI/ISO 14117.

 

Generally speaking, as long as you keep a respectable distance you're probably OK and the worst that should happen is (as you've said) the device will fail over into a safe mode and recover once the field is removed.

 

Still, given the number of variables involved, if I had a pacemaker I'd keep that distance as large as possible and stay very clear of very cheap inductive elements. Newer pacemakers should probably have better immunity too as inductive cooktops get more common.




eracode
Smpl Mnmlst
9332 posts

Uber Geek
+1 received by user: 6198

ID Verified
Trusted
Lifetime subscriber

  #3362282 9-Apr-2025 12:35
Send private message

If you’re looking for an excuse, it might be a good reason to ask someone else to cook. 😀





Sometimes I just sit and think. Other times I just sit.


SomeoneSomewhere
1882 posts

Uber Geek
+1 received by user: 1086

Lifetime subscriber

  #3362289 9-Apr-2025 13:39
Send private message

Interference and recovery is one thing, but there's always the question of whether enough energy is present to just cook the device, cellphone-in-a-microwave style. I wouldn't expect so... but expect is a lovely word. 




eracode
Smpl Mnmlst
9332 posts

Uber Geek
+1 received by user: 6198

ID Verified
Trusted
Lifetime subscriber

  #3362481 9-Apr-2025 20:50
Send private message

Also beware of microwave ovens.





Sometimes I just sit and think. Other times I just sit.


SomeoneSomewhere
1882 posts

Uber Geek
+1 received by user: 1086

Lifetime subscriber

  #3362488 9-Apr-2025 21:28
Send private message

Microwave ovens are (normally) well shielded and use a much higher frequency that doesn't pass through the body too well, so I would expect them to be less of an issue.


Filter this topic showing only the reply marked as answer Create new topic








Geekzone Live »

Try automatic live updates from Geekzone directly in your browser, without refreshing the page, with Geekzone Live now.



Are you subscribed to our RSS feed? You can download the latest headlines and summaries from our stories directly to your computer or smartphone by using a feed reader.