Geekzone: technology news, blogs, forums
Guest
Welcome Guest.
You haven't logged in yet. If you don't have an account you can register now.




13 posts

Geek


Topic # 220300 4-Aug-2017 11:13
Send private message quote this post

Hi,

 

I'm working with an entrepreneur who is developing a new DAC, we are trying to understand if there is a place for his DAC in the market by speaking to audiophiles.

 

We're trying to find out whether or not audiophiles use a DAC.

 

Why they do/don't.

 

DACs that they use and why they chose them, what they like/dislike about them.

 

What they think the most important features are.

 

If anyone is up for a chat I am happy to talk about the DAC that is being developed in as much detail as I am allowed to, perhaps get your thoughts on it and answer any questions you might have.

 

Really appreciate any feedback.


Create new topic
819 posts

Ultimate Geek
+1 received by user: 235


  Reply # 1837082 4-Aug-2017 11:38
Send private message quote this post

What point in the market are you aiming for?  By "new DAC" do you mean a new digital to analogue converter in its entirety, or an existing chip/chipset with different surrounding hardware, or something else?

 

I'm not an "audiophile."  I'm happy with a Muse audio PCM2704 based USB DAC that I plug my ten year old Sennheiser headphones into.


'That VDSL Cat'
6264 posts

Uber Geek
+1 received by user: 1172

Trusted
Spark
Subscriber

  Reply # 1837095 4-Aug-2017 11:51
One person supports this post
Send private message quote this post

personally, i'd love a DAC that supports inline mic aswell.

 

 

 

This is a feature that is often missed off decent dacs and would be rather handy for those who pair a decent set of headphones with an attachable mic.





#include <std_disclaimer>

 

Any comments made are personal opinion and do not reflect directly on the position my current or past employers may have.


 
 
 
 




13 posts

Geek


  Reply # 1839113 4-Aug-2017 12:12
Send private message quote this post

deadlyllama:

 

What point in the market are you aiming for?  By "new DAC" do you mean a new digital to analogue converter in its entirety, or an existing chip/chipset with different surrounding hardware, or something else?

 

I'm not an "audiophile."  I'm happy with a Muse audio PCM2704 based USB DAC that I plug my ten year old Sennheiser headphones into.

 

 

Well, he believes his design would be a high end product. But, he thinks that there is likely to be more interest mid market. His idea is to create an integrated media server, real time processor and DAC. There are unique elements which I can't discuss, but it will have one of the best DAC chips that is already on the market. 

 

By audiophile, we mean someone who has a personal passion for quality audio, we want to rule out people who might use a DAC for business purposes, such as a producer or mix/master.




13 posts

Geek


  Reply # 1839114 4-Aug-2017 12:14
Send private message quote this post

hio77:

 

personally, i'd love a DAC that supports inline mic aswell.

 

 

 

This is a feature that is often missed off decent dacs and would be rather handy for those who pair a decent set of headphones with an attachable mic.

 

 

Hi,

 

Thanks, this is exactly the kind of feedback we are looking for, would you be up for talking in a bit more detail?


1123 posts

Uber Geek
+1 received by user: 140


  Reply # 1839287 4-Aug-2017 17:27
Send private message quote this post

good luck, the market is full to bursting of dac products at all price points.


537 posts

Ultimate Geek
+1 received by user: 53

Trusted
Subscriber

  Reply # 1839294 4-Aug-2017 17:49
Send private message quote this post

I use a FiiO E17 and I'm quite happy with it for the most part, but it could be better.

 

Likes:
 - Display which shows the quality of the input stream (ie, bitrate)
 - Built-in volume and equaliser controls
 - USB, AUX and SPDIF inputs
 - Excellent audio quality and amplification (probably the most important feature lol)

Dislikes:
 - Low battery capacity
 - Mini-USB port (would prefer a USB Type-C)
 - No OTG cable bundled (would be handy for connecting to Android devices)

 

If I were to buy a new DAC, I'd like to get something like the E17 but with a Type-C input and OTG support so I don't need to plug in a second adapter/cable.

 

Although I'm currently NOT in the market for a DAC as I've splurged a bit on a nice pair of wireless aptX-HD headphones, so I don't even use my FiiO these days. My headphones also have direct USB input support so again, a DAC isn't required.




13 posts

Geek


  Reply # 1840323 7-Aug-2017 08:30
Send private message quote this post

d3Xt3r:

 

I use a FiiO E17 and I'm quite happy with it for the most part, but it could be better.

 

Likes:
 - Display which shows the quality of the input stream (ie, bitrate)
 - Built-in volume and equaliser controls
 - USB, AUX and SPDIF inputs
 - Excellent audio quality and amplification (probably the most important feature lol)

Dislikes:
 - Low battery capacity
 - Mini-USB port (would prefer a USB Type-C)
 - No OTG cable bundled (would be handy for connecting to Android devices)

 

If I were to buy a new DAC, I'd like to get something like the E17 but with a Type-C input and OTG support so I don't need to plug in a second adapter/cable.

 

Although I'm currently NOT in the market for a DAC as I've splurged a bit on a nice pair of wireless aptX-HD headphones, so I don't even use my FiiO these days. My headphones also have direct USB input support so again, a DAC isn't required.

 

 

This is awesome feedback, thank you so much. I've been getting a lot of comments about vinyl records, some people have been saying that if you want analogue sound, digital data is never going to compare to playing a vinyl record. Do you have any thoughts on this?

 

Thanks




13 posts

Geek


  Reply # 1840325 7-Aug-2017 08:34
Send private message quote this post

ilovemusic:

 

good luck, the market is full to bursting of dac products at all price points.

 

 

Hi,

 

Yeah I'm definitely finding this, the research is quite overwhelming. So many different price point and they all do something slightly different, and everyone has their own individual preferences.


819 posts

Ultimate Geek
+1 received by user: 235


  Reply # 1840433 7-Aug-2017 10:41
Send private message quote this post

GillJ:

 

This is awesome feedback, thank you so much. I've been getting a lot of comments about vinyl records, some people have been saying that if you want analogue sound, digital data is never going to compare to playing a vinyl record. Do you have any thoughts on this?

 

Thanks

 

 

If you wanted your DAC to be really fancy you could include a tube based preamp as an option for people who like old tech...

 

At the end of the day it's all voltage waveforms, right?  Can a vinyl lover tell the difference between a turntable plugged into their amp, and a turntable plugged into a 24/96 ADC, plugged into a 24/96 DAC, plugged into their amp?


537 posts

Ultimate Geek
+1 received by user: 53

Trusted
Subscriber

  Reply # 1840447 7-Aug-2017 10:53
One person supports this post
Send private message quote this post

GillJ:

 

 

 

I've been getting a lot of comments about vinyl records, some people have been saying that if you want analogue sound, digital data is never going to compare to playing a vinyl record. Do you have any thoughts on this?

 

Thanks

 

I disagree with that. Technically there's no reason why a high-quality digital master cannot compete with Vinyl - I'm talking about recording @24-bit / 196KHz sampling rates. Also, the quality depends on the quality of the source and the and processing equipment, but assuming everything in the chain is A-grade - from source to destination - there's no reason why a high-res digital audio sample can't compete with vinyl. And not just that, technically speaking, digital is far superior to vinyl - for eg you don't have any issues of surface errors (no issues of dust, scratches or other surface deformations), no mechanical errors (mechanical noise, variations in motor speeds), and of course - infinite life (unlike vinyls, which do degrade over time even when stored in ideal conditions).

 

The problems with digital audio though are:

 

 - It's hard to find legit high-res audio files, or even plain old 16-bit FLACs. Websites which offer them are few and even then they've got a very limited selection.
 - It's next to impossible to verify the source / sampling equipment / recording conditions, so you can't tell if it was recorded in the best conditions possible. So just because you've got a 24-bit FLAC doesn't necessarily mean it's high-quality.
 - Listeners need to invest a fair bit to get a decent quality DAC/AMP/headphones and not to mention storage, but to be fair, good quality record players cost quite a bit too.

 

That being said, I suspect the reason why music lovers love vinyl so much has little to do with the audio quality, but rather the nostalgic value of playing a vinyl in a record player - they feel that's how it was "intended" to be listened to by the artists, plus, there's something about being able to physically feel, store, display and treasure your music collection - something you can't really do with digital audio - you can't really "connect" with your music collection like that. Also, various record players have a character to them which makes the music sound just a bit different - and people like this. For instance, take the sound signature of tube amps - people who prefer to use tube amps aren't doing so because they're interested in accurate audio reproduction - it's because of the sound signature or nostalgia.

 

Music is all about invoking a deep emotional response and in the end, the audio quality has very little to with that. For instance, you may be able to listen to a 100% perfect recording on the best audio equipment, but your emotional response to listening to the same piece being performed live will be very different. It's all about the experience.


616 posts

Ultimate Geek
+1 received by user: 159


  Reply # 1840456 7-Aug-2017 11:04
Send private message quote this post

d3Xt3r:

 

at being said, I suspect the reason why music lovers love vinyl so much has little to do with the audio quality, but rather the nostalgic value of playing a vinyl in a record player - they feel that's how it was "intended" to be listened to by the artists, plus, there's something about being able to physically feel, store, display and treasure your music collection

 

 

I concur with your analysis - all other things being equal, if you want to hear a recording as close to the original master and as the engineer intended, digital is empirically superior to vinyl. Given that music is an intensely personal thing, I completely understand why people may still prefer the "vinyl sound" though.

 

Another consideration to add to your list for the resurgent popularity and preference for vinyl would be that - for a long while at least - original vinyl recordings were not victims of the "loudness war" and thus the vinyl mastering itself was often a better, subtler mix with greater dynamic range than the CD or remastered re-issue.

 

Problem these days is that a lot of new releases on vinyl are mastered the same as the parallel digital release, so if that is poor, then it is equally poor on wax as it is in Ones-and-zeroes!

 

 

 

 





.

616 posts

Ultimate Geek
+1 received by user: 159


  Reply # 1840458 7-Aug-2017 11:08
One person supports this post
Send private message quote this post

d3Xt3r:

 

The problems with digital audio though are:

 

 - It's hard to find legit high-res audio files, or even plain old 16-bit FLACs. Websites which offer them are few and even then they've got a very limited selection.
 - It's next to impossible to verify the source / sampling equipment / recording conditions, so you can't tell if it was recorded in the best conditions possible. So just because you've got a 24-bit FLAC doesn't necessarily mean it's high-quality.
 - Listeners need to invest a fair bit to get a decent quality DAC/AMP/headphones and not to mention storage, but to be fair, good quality record players cost quite a bit too.

 

 

 

 

 

 

Having done a lot of very "unscientific" listening, the benefits of "hi-res" audio have certainly not been made apparent to me.

 

I have a number of high bit/sample rate albums in the library and I don't believe they are discernibly improved over their original 16 bit 44Khz counterparts...and they take up a shed-load more storage as well!

 

As you allude to, the magic is almost always in the quality of recording itself and how well it was mixed and mastered.





.

537 posts

Ultimate Geek
+1 received by user: 53

Trusted
Subscriber

  Reply # 1840509 7-Aug-2017 12:10
Send private message quote this post

Item:

 

 

 

Having done a lot of very "unscientific" listening, the benefits of "hi-res" audio have certainly not been made apparent to me.

 

I have a number of high bit/sample rate albums in the library and I don't believe they are discernibly improved over their original 16 bit 44Khz counterparts...and they take up a shed-load more storage as well!

 

As you allude to, the magic is almost always in the quality of recording itself and how well it was mixed and mastered.

 

 

Same with me, to be honest. But the main reason why I prefer buying high-res audio (or even 16bit FLACs) is for transcoding. At present, my codec of choice for storing music on my phone is Opus (excellent quality at low bitrates/sizes), but a couple of years go my go-to codec was AAC. So if a superior codec comes along to replace Opus in the future, I can just transcode from my original "master". :)

 

I also often use my masters to compare various codecs/bitrates/audio equipment, so I quite like having them around.




13 posts

Geek


  Reply # 1841213 8-Aug-2017 15:25
Send private message quote this post

deadlyllama:

 

GillJ:

 

This is awesome feedback, thank you so much. I've been getting a lot of comments about vinyl records, some people have been saying that if you want analogue sound, digital data is never going to compare to playing a vinyl record. Do you have any thoughts on this?

 

Thanks

 

 

If you wanted your DAC to be really fancy you could include a tube based preamp as an option for people who like old tech...

 

At the end of the day it's all voltage waveforms, right?  Can a vinyl lover tell the difference between a turntable plugged into their amp, and a turntable plugged into a 24/96 ADC, plugged into a 24/96 DAC, plugged into their amp?

 

 

Hi, thanks for the suggestion, do you think including a tube based preamp would actually appeal to vinyl lovers, or will they just stick to their records?

 

I have no idea if anyone could actually tell the difference, I know I wouldn't be able to, but some people do seem to feel really strongly about it. Hopefully a bit more research will shed some light on it.

 

 




13 posts

Geek


  Reply # 1841252 8-Aug-2017 16:01
Send private message quote this post

d3Xt3r:

 

GillJ:

 

 

 

I've been getting a lot of comments about vinyl records, some people have been saying that if you want analogue sound, digital data is never going to compare to playing a vinyl record. Do you have any thoughts on this?

 

Thanks

 

I disagree with that. Technically there's no reason why a high-quality digital master cannot compete with Vinyl - I'm talking about recording @24-bit / 196KHz sampling rates. Also, the quality depends on the quality of the source and the and processing equipment, but assuming everything in the chain is A-grade - from source to destination - there's no reason why a high-res digital audio sample can't compete with vinyl. And not just that, technically speaking, digital is far superior to vinyl - for eg you don't have any issues of surface errors (no issues of dust, scratches or other surface deformations), no mechanical errors (mechanical noise, variations in motor speeds), and of course - infinite life (unlike vinyls, which do degrade over time even when stored in ideal conditions).

 

The problems with digital audio though are:

 

 - It's hard to find legit high-res audio files, or even plain old 16-bit FLACs. Websites which offer them are few and even then they've got a very limited selection.
 - It's next to impossible to verify the source / sampling equipment / recording conditions, so you can't tell if it was recorded in the best conditions possible. So just because you've got a 24-bit FLAC doesn't necessarily mean it's high-quality.
 - Listeners need to invest a fair bit to get a decent quality DAC/AMP/headphones and not to mention storage, but to be fair, good quality record players cost quite a bit too.

 

That being said, I suspect the reason why music lovers love vinyl so much has little to do with the audio quality, but rather the nostalgic value of playing a vinyl in a record player - they feel that's how it was "intended" to be listened to by the artists, plus, there's something about being able to physically feel, store, display and treasure your music collection - something you can't really do with digital audio - you can't really "connect" with your music collection like that. Also, various record players have a character to them which makes the music sound just a bit different - and people like this. For instance, take the sound signature of tube amps - people who prefer to use tube amps aren't doing so because they're interested in accurate audio reproduction - it's because of the sound signature or nostalgia.

 

Music is all about invoking a deep emotional response and in the end, the audio quality has very little to with that. For instance, you may be able to listen to a 100% perfect recording on the best audio equipment, but your emotional response to listening to the same piece being performed live will be very different. It's all about the experience.

 

 

Hi, thanks again for your comments. The differing opinions on digital vs analogue are really interesting. Your comment about how the artist intended the music to be listened to is something I've come across a few times, and also your comment about having a physical copy.

 

Your comment about an emotional connection is something I have heard on both sides of the argument.

 

This is really brilliant feedback, I think you've pretty much covered everything I've looking at at the moment. Thanks again


Create new topic



Twitter »

Follow us to receive Twitter updates when new discussions are posted in our forums:



Follow us to receive Twitter updates when news items and blogs are posted in our frontpage:



Follow us to receive Twitter updates when tech item prices are listed in our price comparison site:





News »

Public Wi-Fi plus cloud file sharing
Posted 18-Aug-2017 11:20


D-Link NZ launches professional Wireless AC Wave 2 Access Point for businesses
Posted 17-Aug-2017 19:25


Garmin introduces the Rino 700 five-watt two-way handheld radio
Posted 17-Aug-2017 19:04


Garmin announces the Foretrex 601 and Foretrex 701 Ballistic Edition for outdoor and tactical use
Posted 17-Aug-2017 19:02


Brightstar announces new distribution partnership with Samsung Knox platform in Australia
Posted 17-Aug-2017 17:07


Free gig-enabled WiFi network extends across Dunedin
Posted 17-Aug-2017 17:04


Samsung expands with connect Gear S3 Frontier
Posted 17-Aug-2017 15:55


Fact-checking Southern Cross Next cable is fastest to USA
Posted 17-Aug-2017 13:57


Thurrott says Microsoft Surface is dead last for reliability
Posted 16-Aug-2017 15:19


LibreOffice 5.4 works better with Microsoft Office files
Posted 16-Aug-2017 13:32


Certus launches Cognition
Posted 14-Aug-2017 09:31


Spark adds Cambridge, Turangi to 4.5G network
Posted 10-Aug-2017 17:55


REANNZ network to receive ongoing Government funding through to 2024
Posted 10-Aug-2017 16:05


Chorus backhaul starts with 2degrees
Posted 10-Aug-2017 15:49


New Zealanders cool on data analytics catching benefit fraud
Posted 10-Aug-2017 09:56



Geekzone Live »

Try automatic live updates from Geekzone directly in your browser, without refreshing the page, with Geekzone Live now.



Are you subscribed to our RSS feed? You can download the latest headlines and summaries from our stories directly to your computer or smartphone by using a feed reader.

Alternatively, you can receive a daily email with Geekzone updates.