Geekzone: technology news, blogs, forums
Guest
Welcome Guest.
You haven't logged in yet. If you don't have an account you can register now.


1990 posts

Uber Geek
+1 received by user: 20

Trusted
Subscriber

Topic # 7938 23-May-2006 10:45
Send private message

Does anyone know what technique is used to render a 16:9 image with 1024 x 768 (4:3) resolution?

Current opinion is Plasma for screen size greater than 32", but I'm unclear as to what tricks are used to produce the image and if there are gottchas as a result.

Create new topic
251 posts

Ultimate Geek
+1 received by user: 1


  Reply # 36374 23-May-2006 11:51
Send private message

I'm not sure of the technical side of things, but it would depend on the manufacturer. For instance, my Grundig Xentia has an Autoformat mode where normal 4:3 is rendered with the center of the screen at almost normal 4:3 and blends out to 16:9 at the edges. This gives a viewing mode where you don't suffer from the 16:9 stretch over the whole screen. Also, any letterboxed 4:3 content is automatically zoomed out to 16:9 with the letterboxing cropped.

8 posts

Wannabe Geek


  Reply # 36638 25-May-2006 22:46
Send private message

most plasmas will only give you a stretch or black (grey for pioneer) bars on the side if you use a PC input. They usually cant handle wide screen PC (1280x768for example) formats either. Remember TV uses 16:9 PC uses 16:10. If you need to get big PC images your best bet is a large LCD panel, try for the multimedia models.



1990 posts

Uber Geek
+1 received by user: 20

Trusted
Subscriber

  Reply # 36661 26-May-2006 09:01
Send private message

The answer I have found is that the 42”,  1024 x 768 plasma, uses a simple algorithm to drop pixels when displaying a 4:3 image from a 4:3 input. The same algorithm is used to display a 16:9 image from and 16:9 input, therefore, 42" plasma's only produce a reasonable image if a 4:3 input is displayed at 16:9. I tested this theory with 2 Panasonic commercial panels 42" 1024 x 768 and the 50" 1366 x 768, head to head, on 4:3 input the difference was dramatic, with the 50" giving a clear crisp image, while the 42" inch was jagged and blurred. This discounted my initial assumption that a smaller screen with the same vertical resolution will give a sharper image. Conclusion, 42” plasmas (all of which I have found at 1024 x 768) are good for TV input (4:3) that you want to watch “stretched” to a 16:9 display, if you prefer to watch the image in it’s correct proportions, go up or down a size that supports a native 16:9 resolution. In the end I purchased the 50” Panasonic panel. The TV & Panel have the same screen, but I chose the panel as the chassis is smaller (no speakers or front mounted inputs) and supports a WiFi presentation adapter.

Create new topic

Twitter »

Follow us to receive Twitter updates when new discussions are posted in our forums:



Follow us to receive Twitter updates when news items and blogs are posted in our frontpage:



Follow us to receive Twitter updates when tech item prices are listed in our price comparison site:



Geekzone Live »

Try automatic live updates from Geekzone directly in your browser, without refreshing the page, with Geekzone Live now.



Are you subscribed to our RSS feed? You can download the latest headlines and summaries from our stories directly to your computer or smartphone by using a feed reader.

Alternatively, you can receive a daily email with Geekzone updates.