Thought I'd raise this one, as it is an issue that is going get bigger with N-DSL.
I've been having some intermittent DSL disconnects for a while, not major, maybe once or twice per week. However, last Monday (well over a few days preceeding), I started having a lot of DSL disconnects, so I logged a fault with Xnet. Telecom (eventually) did there bit in putting an analyzer on the line, and then I think switching me to a low power profile or something. I'm not sure when this happened, as it was not reported back to me. Nor did this fix anything.
Now that side of things hasn't caused too much of an issue, and I also changed to a different Router that is less susceptible to DSL disconnects (but with a big compromise in performance). The problem now is the original fault has now escalated causing my VFX lines to become unusable, so now I'm without a landline (I don't have access to the PSTN line, I just pay & use the DSL on it).
My main concern here is not so much that I have a fault, but it's more about the time frame it seems to take to get DSL issues resolved. I logged a fault 1 week ago, and now it is worse than when it started. I've dealt with many of these DSL issues in the past and often they seem to take a lot of time and effort to get resolved. Why is this?
DSL issues can be rather annoying, but apart from that they are not usually a major issue to the average end user: I.E. If a user has to wait a few minutes for their Internet to reconnect to receive their email, then annoying yes, but they still get their email. However, add VoIP lines (or other critical apps), then any DSL issue become big issue.
Particularly with N-DSL in mind, what are the expected turn around times & priorities placed on resolving DSL issues?
Look forward to some constructive feedback / discussion on this.
Hope my issue won't take too long to resolve now. I suspect a faulty port so asked Jason (@ Xnet) to see if I can be moved onto a new ISAM port.