|
|
|
Klipspringer: As far as I understand, The Telecommunications (Interception Capability and Security) Bill is the thing that everybody is up in arms about. It replaces the current Telecommunications (Interception Capability) Act of 2004.
The Telecommunications (Interception Capability and Security) Bill accompanies the current GCSB bill.
Why are people marching against the GCSB bill? Surely this is proof enough that half the people marching have no idea what they are really marching for????
Anybody know when there is a march against the Telecommunications (Interception Capability and Security) Bill? Or have I missed it?
iPad Pro 11" + iPhone 15 Pro Max + 2degrees 4tw!
These comments are my own and do not represent the opinions of 2degrees.
DonGould:
This could be fixed by just putting up a bunch of publicly visible camera that we can all log on to.
That's what we're doing in our neighborhood. We can all look at the cameras and if any of us sees a problem when we sort it out.
Really useful to see when trucks turn up to deliver stuff, check if the people we want to meet are there, lots and lots of benefits.
DonGould: Mr Dunne, With all due respect, I spend some time in the weekend sending a very polite email to 17MPs on a list provided here. I've had half a dozen acknowledgements. You people simply don't listen until people rise up and shout in the streets. You people shout in the streets at us to vote for you (yes last election there were endless cars driving my neighborhood with loud hailers) but when it comes time for you to listen to what we've got to say then you cry foul. Perhaps if you went home and actually faced these people for a discussion then your wife and neighbours wouldn't have to be faced with this. D
DonGould: "They are the lowest form of life imaginable. If they think they are going to persuade anyone to their point of view with these tactics, they're frankly deluded."
http://www.stuff.co.nz/national/politics/9009941/Dunne-lashes-back-at-noisy-protesters
Mr Dunne,
With all due respect, I spend some time in the weekend sending a very polite email to 175 MPs on a list provided here.
I've had half a dozen acknowledgements.
You people simply don't listen until people rise up and shout in the streets.
You people shout in the streets at us to vote for you (yes last election there were endless cars driving my neighborhood with loud hailers) but when it comes time for you to listen to what we've got to say then you cry foul.
Perhaps if you went home and actually faced these people for a discussion then your wife and neighbours wouldn't have to be faced with this.
D
SaltyNZ:
Noting that I say this in my own private capacity, not on behalf of my employer, I am also not very happy about the changes in the TICS bill, which give the GCSB effective control over nearly every aspect of telco design. This probably affects me more than you, as a design engineer at a telco, but it should concern you too at least a little, because telcos could be forced to adopt architectures that make it particularly easy to hoover up everything ala the GCSB bill. Typically this will be very expensive, which is a cost that they would pass on to you.
DonGould:freitasm: You rather trade an entire nation's privacy right for police finding some idiot who turned chairs upside down?
That's a high price to pay to extend something the police is already empowered to do.
100% agree with you MF.
You lot don't even live here, I do. To me that mess is just a bunch of chairs with bugger all meaning and value.
I didn't even know what it was until my wife explained because she'd read about it in the paper.
I think you're totally right that we don't change the law to disrespect everyone's privacy just because some twat disrespected a bunch of chairs that were put there as a memorial for a bunch of other people.
My brother got killed last year. He was on a bike. You don't see me running around saying that we should be putting spy equipment in every car and on every road because on of the horses on the farm did a dump on the bit of grass that we spread some ashes.... ya, even writing that I do realise just how stupid my analogy sounds.
To me stupid is what this is about. It's a total over reaction to suggest we spy on the whole country because some idiot deface a memorial.
Let's just throw my phone number on a sign down there and if someone sees the chairs turned over, I'm not far away, let them call me and I'll go help stand them back up again. 03 348 7235.
D
Here is a crazy notion, lets give peace a chance.
Klipspringer:
Watch this space.
iPad Pro 11" + iPhone 15 Pro Max + 2degrees 4tw!
These comments are my own and do not represent the opinions of 2degrees.
SaltyNZ:Klipspringer: As far as I understand, The Telecommunications (Interception Capability and Security) Bill is the thing that everybody is up in arms about. It replaces the current Telecommunications (Interception Capability) Act of 2004.
The Telecommunications (Interception Capability and Security) Bill accompanies the current GCSB bill.
Why are people marching against the GCSB bill? Surely this is proof enough that half the people marching have no idea what they are really marching for????
Anybody know when there is a march against the Telecommunications (Interception Capability and Security) Bill? Or have I missed it?
Noting that I say this in my own private capacity, not on behalf of my employer, I am also not very happy about the changes in the TICS bill, which give the GCSB effective control over nearly every aspect of telco design. This probably affects me more than you, as a design engineer at a telco, but it should concern you too at least a little, because telcos could be forced to adopt architectures that make it particularly easy to hoover up everything ala the GCSB bill. Typically this will be very expensive, which is a cost that they would pass on to you.
KiwiNZ: Your trivialisation of a tragedy is disgraceful and distasteful.
Klipspringer:DonGould:
This could be fixed by just putting up a bunch of publicly visible camera that we can all log on to.
That's what we're doing in our neighborhood. We can all look at the cameras and if any of us sees a problem when we sort it out.
Really useful to see when trucks turn up to deliver stuff, check if the people we want to meet are there, lots and lots of benefits.
WoW thats spying taking up to a whole new level. In fact, its spying and sharing it with the entire neighboorhood. pffffttt
You sure you opposed to this new bill?DonGould: Mr Dunne, With all due respect, I spend some time in the weekend sending a very polite email to 17MPs on a list provided here. I've had half a dozen acknowledgements. You people simply don't listen until people rise up and shout in the streets. You people shout in the streets at us to vote for you (yes last election there were endless cars driving my neighborhood with loud hailers) but when it comes time for you to listen to what we've got to say then you cry foul. Perhaps if you went home and actually faced these people for a discussion then your wife and neighbours wouldn't have to be faced with this. D
So intimidation is the answer?
I always find it odd that those opposed to a wrong, end up supporting another wrong. The hacking of the National Party website is another example (its for a good cause)!
If these people want to be heard they should not go around doing this type of thing. It just ends up building more support for the bill.
Klipspringer:freitasm: So put better security at the memorial, not in everyone else's place.
And how do you propose they impliment that security? By not searching "everybody's" bags? By not putting up cameras which record everybody entering/exiting the memorial? Please explain this security you refering to?
Security = searching people and/or bags = Where's my privacy????
Anybody that goes to the memorial does not have the right to total privacy.
KiwiNZ: If the GCSB Bill can help find scum like this then pass it now
http://www.stuff.co.nz/national/crime/9010167/Chairs-vandalism-sickening
Klipspringer:freitasm:
Exactly as I said: better security at the memorial. Be it cameras, etc. You have no expectation of privacy in public.
Using this vandalism as support for a carte blanche for the GCSB to have powers over EVERYONE is way beyond the benefits proposed.
The internet is a public place.
|
|
|