Geekzone: technology news, blogs, forums
Guest
Welcome Guest.
You haven't logged in yet. If you don't have an account you can register now.


Krishant007

1403 posts

Uber Geek
+1 received by user: 80


#116428 29-Apr-2013 09:17
Send private message

I am not sure if this thread would belong in this topic (feel free to move it to an appropriate topic)

The recent post about the QNAP NAS that was just released got me thinking. I was going to be buying the Synology Diskstation DS213+ from USA when i travel there in July this year.

But thought I might also take a look at the QNAP offering. I have tried to do some reading. I wanted to know how do the QNAP Turbo NAS TS-221 and the Synology DS213+ compare - in terms of hardware and software (QTS in QNAP and DSM in Synology).

Does anyone have experience with both of these operating systems - are they quite similar? What are the features compared? For example, my mate uses a Synology and he is able to remotely queue tasks such as downloads from his phone. Does the QNAP have this sort of ability. 

From my readings, I am able to see that both operating systems are watered down versions of Linux in one way or another. 

Also in terms of the hardware, I see the QNAP has more RAM whereas the Synology has a better processor (dual core vs one core). Anyone have any comments about this?

Just trying to decide which overall is the better NAS, software wise and hardware wise.

Here are some of my requirements if that helps:
  • Able to stream on tablets - Android or iOS
  • Able to access remotely from a computer (or a mobile device to queue tasks or check backups etc)
  • Able to stream videos/photos/music to multiple devices on the network - a few computers, PS3 and TV
  • Should be able to do backups
  • Dual disks so can create redundancy 
[EDIT - inserted links]

Create new topic
raytaylor
4076 posts

Uber Geek
+1 received by user: 1296

Trusted

  #811417 5-May-2013 01:02
Send private message

I cant say i have tried the synology but i personally love the qnaps.
I dont think they do the queuing from an iphone.

They do everything else you have specified and if you are only sharing files then processor speed and ram shouldnt be too much of a concern

There are also a couple of local suppliers of qnap too so the support should be good if you buy local.




Ray Taylor

There is no place like localhost

Spreadsheet for Comparing Electricity Plans Here




Krishant007

1403 posts

Uber Geek
+1 received by user: 80


  #811438 5-May-2013 08:08
Send private message

Ahh thanks a lot. In what situations are more RAM and higher processing power helpful? Like when hosting web sites?

raytaylor
4076 posts

Uber Geek
+1 received by user: 1296

Trusted

  #811466 5-May-2013 09:27
Send private message

Yes
The qnap has an http, mysql and other server functions where processing on the machine take place. For a simple website it doesnt matter, but if you are hosting a large mysql database where it requires alot of processing power then it can be an advantage.

Remember an old pentium II running at 333mhz can easily serve files over a windows share - it doesnt take much.

So for the basic file server - anything is fine. Its when you add on the extra applications where it can require more - and even then for most home users it doesnt require much.




Ray Taylor

There is no place like localhost

Spreadsheet for Comparing Electricity Plans Here




Krishant007

1403 posts

Uber Geek
+1 received by user: 80


  #811468 5-May-2013 09:33
Send private message

Great. That sounds good to me. I thought since I will be having lot of HD content, it might require some more RAM. A mate of mine uses the Synology DS212J and he wishes HD content played a bit quicker.

So no worries, now I will just look at which one is cheaper.

dimsim
867 posts

Ultimate Geek
+1 received by user: 151

Trusted
Lifetime subscriber

  #811476 5-May-2013 10:01
Send private message

processor dual core  vs single core would also be important if you want the NAS to perform transcoding duties on your video files. if you want to use transcoding definitely go for the more powerful processor.

PANiCnz
999 posts

Ultimate Geek
+1 received by user: 161


  #811636 5-May-2013 16:40
Send private message

I doubt there is much difference in the CPU's, one is dual core 1Ghz while the other is single core 2Ghz. Both should be fine for streaming HD content your friends issues are probably related to some other issue and not the processor speed of his NAS.

 
 
 
 

Shop now for Lenovo laptops and other devices (affiliate link).
PANiCnz
999 posts

Ultimate Geek
+1 received by user: 161


  #811638 5-May-2013 16:42
Send private message

I reckon the difference between the two units is pretty marginal, I'd read some online reviews and make a decision yourself. The benefits or negatives of either device are probably reasonably limited. Look for some decent reviews that show transfer speeds on Samba/CIFS.

Smallnetbuilder do good reviews.

Create new topic








Geekzone Live »

Try automatic live updates from Geekzone directly in your browser, without refreshing the page, with Geekzone Live now.



Are you subscribed to our RSS feed? You can download the latest headlines and summaries from our stories directly to your computer or smartphone by using a feed reader.