![]() ![]() |
asjohnstone:
I'd love to be able to speak with someone that can actually give me real information. I work from home and lack of fibre is killing me.
asjohnstone: Being less productive and travelling more than I need to :-(
The consenting process is utterly flawed, we should be working on the basis of implied consent in the absence of justifiable objections
asjohnstone: Being less productive and travelling more than I need to :-(
Jase2985:asjohnstone: Being less productive and travelling more than I need to :-(
you have managed ok up till now
what would you do it you were not getting fibre till 2019? or someone refused consent?
yes the process is flawed, but its how it is until it gets changed.
graemeh:
I think you're getting need and want mixed up there.
I totally agree the current process could be vastly improved but your idea of running rough shod over private property rights is going too far.
It would be much easier if Chorus (or the relevant LFC) had the right to replace the current copper circuit with fibre without needing consent (provided that they could do this without causing major damage to the property).
asjohnstone:graemeh:
I think you're getting need and want mixed up there.
I totally agree the current process could be vastly improved but your idea of running rough shod over private property rights is going too far.
It would be much easier if Chorus (or the relevant LFC) had the right to replace the current copper circuit with fibre without needing consent (provided that they could do this without causing major damage to the property).
That's a fair comment, I guess, but the law as structured is hurting the economic development of the country badly. It looks like the law is changing to an implied consent model soon anyway.
in my case the copper is in a duct. As far as I understand it it's a simple matter of blowing a fibre down the existing duct. It's entirely non disruptive. It's not right that i should have to chase down landlords, their lack of english language skills to complete the form also complicates things.
asjohnstone: I think it's well understood that fast reliable internet connections are a requirement for modern business to grow.
"A new report, conducted jointly by Ericsson (NASDAQ:ERIC), Arthur D. Little and Chalmers University of Technology in 33 OECD countries, quantifies the isolated impact of broadband speed, showing that doubling the broadband speed for an economy increases GDP by 0.3%.* A 0.3 percent GDP growth in the OECD region is equivalent to USD 126 billion. This corresponds to more than one seventh of the average annual OECD growth rate in the last decade. The study also shows that additional doublings of speed can yield growth in excess of 0.3 percent (e.g. quadrupling of speed equals 0.6 percent GDP growth stimulus)
http://www.ericsson.com/news/1550083
asjohnstone: 0.3% GDP growth is actually a pretty massive number.
But this has gone so far off topic, that I'm not going to respond further. My point is well made and the truth of it self evident.
![]() ![]() |