kiwirock:
I have spent $2700 on an Outback for headgasket failures and the Warranty company has spent a few more grand more. They car still runs rough and it's been on good synthetics.
Definitely ditch them before they hit 140,000K's. It's roulette after that.
As for the new one's with the CVT, they have great get up and go but are limited for towing.The CVT saves on weight. That's all they are on these cars for. Fuel consumption has always impressed me with Subaru and their AWD. But that's it, definitely not their engines.
As for the CVT, there is a filter the size of half a coke can in these transmissions that can only be replaced having the transmission removed from the vehicle. Dumbest idea I have ever seen in my life. It's not worth the fuel savings.
I really don't understand the logic in this after they and moved the engine oil filter to the top of the motor - the best idea I've seen in my life.
I have other friends that swear by Subaru, but they all have less than 140,000K's on them. My Nissan is 20 years old with well over 200,000K's and will see more than 300,000. With no engine removals or over-hauls of engine parts, just ABS from no using it enough.
Can't say the same for Subaru.
Fast forward to 2:35. Way to go Subaru https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=34hS9691L04
To be fair I've never owned a car, nor intend to, that has more than 80K on the clock.